| Literature DB >> 30127720 |
Hiroyuki Konishi1, Hiroshi Kiyama1.
Abstract
Microglia are activated after neuronal injury and in neurodegenerative diseases, and trigger neuroinflammation in the central nervous system (CNS). Microglia-derived neuroinflammation has both beneficial and detrimental effects on neurons. Because the timing and magnitude of microglial activation is thought to be a critical determinant of neuronal fate, understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying microglial activation is required to enable establishment of microglia-targeted therapies for neural diseases. Plasma membrane receptors play primary roles as activators of microglia and in this review, we focus on a receptor complex involving triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2) and DNAX-activating protein of 12 kDa (DAP12), both of which are causative genes for Nasu-Hakola disease, a dementia with bone cysts. Recent transcriptome approaches demonstrated TREM2/DAP12 signaling as the principal regulator that transforms microglia from a homeostatic to a neural disease-associated state. Furthermore, animal model studies revealed critical roles for TREM2/DAP12 in the regulation of microglial activity, including survival, phagocytosis, and cytokine production, not only in Alzheimer's disease but also in other neural diseases, such as Parkinson's disease, demyelinating disease, ischemia, and peripheral nerve injury. Intriguingly, while TREM2/DAP12-mediated microglial activation is detrimental for some diseases, including peripheral nerve injury, it is beneficial for other diseases. As the role of activated microglia differs among disease models, TREM2/DAP12 signaling may result in different outcomes in different diseases. In this review we discuss recent perspectives on the role of TREM2/DAP12 in microglia and their contribution to neural diseases.Entities:
Keywords: ITAM; Syk; TYROBP; damage; degeneration; inflammation; injury; regeneration
Year: 2018 PMID: 30127720 PMCID: PMC6087757 DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2018.00206
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Neurosci ISSN: 1662-5102 Impact factor: 5.505
Figure 1Schematic representation of TREM2/DAP12 signaling in microglia. (A) Ligands and downstream signaling of TREM2/DAP12. Of the known TREM2 ligands, only ligands that highly correlate with neural diseases are shown. Upon ligand binding to TREM2, two tyrosine residues within the ITAM motif of DAP12 are phosphorylated, which recruits Syk kinase to activate downstream signaling molecules, such as ERK, PI3K, PLCγ, and Vav. Src, the main effector of CSF1R, is a kinase supposed to phosphorylate the ITAM tyrosine residues. The soluble form of TREM2, sTREM2, is generated by ectodomain shedding by ADAM 10 or 17, which activates PI3K, ERK and NFκB via an unknown receptor. Note that parts of the signaling pathways are inferred from studies of other types of myeloid cells, such as macrophages and osteoclasts. (B) A putative mechanism by which TREM2/DAP12 generates opposing signals. Upon binding of high avidity ligands to TREM2, both tyrosine residues in the ITAM motif become phosphorylated and the recruited Syk kinase activates downstream signaling molecules, as shown in (A). Conversely, in the case of low avidity ligands, only partial phosphorylation occurs and then activated SHP-1 phosphatase dephosphorylates molecules downstream of Syk signaling to inhibit cellular activation.
Microglial TREM2/DAP12 function in neural diseases other than AD.
| MPP (Mix culture) | DAP12 loss-of-function mouse (KΔ75) | Loss of dopaminergic neuron ↓ | DAP12: detrimental | Kinugawa et al., |
| MPTP | DAP12 loss-of-function mouse (KΔ75) | Microglial number → | DAP12: No effect | |
| 6-OHDA | DAP12 loss-of-function mouse (KΔ75) | Microglial number ↓ | DAP12: detrimental | Virgone-Carlotta et al., |
| Behavioral alteration ↓ | ||||
| MPTP | TREM2 KO mouse | Microglial number ↓ | TREM2: No effect | Belloli et al., |
| [11C]PK11195 uptake by microglia ↑ | ||||
| Pro-inflammatory molecule (IL-1β, TNF-α) ↓ | ||||
| Loss of DAT activity → | ||||
| MPTP | TREM2 overexpression by adenovirus | Microglial number ↓ | TREM2: beneficial | Ren et al., |
| Loss of TH immunoreactivity ↓ | ||||
| EAE | DAP12 loss-of-function mouse (KΔ75) | Activation marker of microglia (MHCII) ↓ | DAP12: detrimental | Bakker et al., |
| EAE Severity (Clinical score) ↓ | ||||
| EAE | Transplantation of TREM2-transduced bone marrow-derived myeloid cells | Number of phagocytic cells ↑ | TREM2: beneficial | Takahashi et al., |
| EAE Severity (Clinical score) ↓ | ||||
| EAE | TREM2 functional blocking antibody | Leucocytic infiltration ↑ | TREM2: beneficial | Piccio et al., |
| Cuprizone | TREM2 KO mouse | Microglial number ↓ | TREM2: beneficial | Poliani et al., |
| Dystrophic morphology of microglia | ||||
| Pro-inflammatory molecule (IL-1β, IL-6, etc.) ↓ | ||||
| Phagocytic molecule (Axl) ↓ | ||||
| Molecules for lipid transport and metabolism (ApoE etc.) ↓ | ||||
| Clearance of myelin debris ↓ | ||||
| Axonal damage ↑ | ||||
| Remyelination ↓ | ||||
| Cuprizone | TREM2 KO mouse | Microglial number ↓ | TREM2: beneficial | Cantoni et al., |
| Less activated morphology of microglia | ||||
| Activation marker of microglia (Mac-3, MHCII) ↓ | ||||
| Pro-inflammatory molecule (iNOS) ↓ | ||||
| Molecules for lipid metabolism (Lipoprotein lipase) ↓ | ||||
| Clearance of myelin debris ↓ | ||||
| Axonal damage ↑ | ||||
| Neurological deficit ↑ | ||||
| Transient middle cerebral artery occlusion | TREM2 KO mouse | Microglial number ↓ | TREM2: No effect | Sieber et al., |
| Permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion | TREM2 KO mouse | Number of IB4+ activated microglia ↓ | TREM2: beneficial | Kawabori et al., |
| Transient middle cerebral artery occlusion | TREM2 siRNA | Pro-inflammatory molecule (IL-1β, TNF-α) ↑ | TREM2: beneficial | Wu et al., |
| Transient middle cerebral artery occlusion | TREM2 siRNA | Pro-inflammatory molecule (iNOS) ↑ | TREM2: beneficial | Zhai et al., |
| Number of apoptotic neuron ↑ | ||||
| Infarct size → | ||||
| Neurological deficit → | ||||
| TREM2 overexpression by lentivirus | Pro-inflammatory molecule (iNOS) ↓ | |||
| Anti-inflammatory molecule (Arg-1) ↑ | ||||
| Number of apoptotic neuron ↓ | ||||
| Infarct size ↓ | ||||
| Neurological deficit ↓ | ||||
| Motor nerve injury | DAP12 KO mouse | Microglial number ↓ | DAP12: detrimental | Kobayashi et al., |
| Neuropathic pain (Sensory nerve injury) | DAP12 KO mouse | Microglial proliferation → | DAP12: detrimental for pain | Guan et al., |
| Neuropathic pain (Sensory nerve injury) | DAP12 KO mouse | Microglial number ↓ | TREM2/DAP12: detrimental for pain | Kobayashi et al., |
| TREM2 agonistic antibody | Pro-inflammatory molecule (IL-1β, TNF-α, IRF8) ↑ | |||
| Neuropathic pain ↑ | ||||
| Motor nerve injury | TREM2 KO mouse | Neuronal damage ↓ | TREM2: detrimental | Krasemann et al., |
| TREM2 KO mouse | Microglial number ↓ | Zheng et al., | ||
| Less activated morphology of microglia | ||||
| TREM2 KO mouse | Lesion site: Number of microglia/macrophages ↑ | TREM2: detrimental | Saber et al., | |
| TREM2 KO mouse | Speed of process extension ↓ | Mazaheri et al., | ||
Figure 2Summary of consequences of microglial TREM2/DAP12 in neural diseases. (A) Alzheimer's disease. (B) Parkinson's disease. (C) Demyelinating disease (cuprizone and EAE models). (D) Ischemia. (E) Peripheral nerve injury (cranial motor nerve injury and sensory nerve injury models).