Literature DB >> 30127179

Amblyopia: It is time to take action.

Piyush Kohli1, R K Bansal1, Tanvi Soni1, Anugya Agrawal1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30127179      PMCID: PMC6113837          DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_89_18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0301-4738            Impact factor:   1.848


× No keyword cloud information.
Sir, We retrospectively analyzed demographic and clinical profile of treatment-naïve patients presenting to a tertiary hospital in North India from 2001 to 2015. Impaired vision was mostly detected at the school level. About two third of the patients presented after the critical age of amblyopia, that is, 7 years.[1] Patients with nonrefractive amblyopia presented late as majority of parents were ignorant of long-term complications of squint and ptosis [Table 1]. Unilateral amblyopes remained undetected and presented late. Mean age of presentation for bilateral and unilateral amblyopes was 7.7 ± 4.4 and 13.9 ± 8.3 years, respectively (P < 0.001). Most females presented near their marriageable age and yearned for a good cosmetic outcome for squint or ptosis rather than visual gain. Mean age of presentation for male and female patients was 11.4 ± 7.5 and 12.4 ± 8.2 years, respectively (P = 0.026).
Table 1

Gender and age-wise distribution in different types of amblyopia

Gender and age-wise distribution in different types of amblyopia Mean presenting best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of unilateral amblyopes was worse than bilateral amblyopes; and nonrefractive amblyopia was worse than refractive amblyopia [Fig. 1]. Severe amblyopia, that is, BCVA ≤20/100, was more common in patients ≤7 years than >7 years of age (24.0% vs 47.1%).[2] Patients with nonrefractive amblyopia mostly presented with severe amblyopia [Table 1].
Figure 1

Comparison of best-corrected visual acuity in various types of amblyopia

Comparison of best-corrected visual acuity in various types of amblyopia We have to overcome several obstacles in order to decrease the impact of amblyopia on the society. The first and foremost step is to ensure maximum community participation. This requires educating people on the subject so as to uproot the myths prevalent in the society.[345] Organization of awareness programs in collaboration with grass root health-care personnel working in maternal and child health care; as well as social and religious leaders will allow maximum penetration of the propaganda in the society. Apart from awareness campaigns, effort should be made to screen the preschool children at Anganwadis and crèches. We recommend introducing the practice of getting comprehensive eye check-up by a qualified ophthalmologist before admission to all government and private schools. As parents have great trust in physicians and pediatricians, they play a great role in informing the parents about the problem and its grave complications. Effort should be made to enroll all the pediatric health-care providers to screen and refer maximum children in the critical period.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  5 in total

1.  Perceptions of eye diseases and eye care needs of children among parents in rural south India: the Kariapatti Pediatric Eye Evaluation Project (KEEP).

Authors:  Praveen K Nirmalan; Sethu Sheeladevi; Velayutham Tamilselvi; Arockia C L Victor; Perumalsamy Vijayalakshmi; Lakshmi Rahmathullah
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 2.  Amblyopia.

Authors:  Diana DeSantis
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.278

3.  A randomized trial of prescribed patching regimens for treatment of severe amblyopia in children.

Authors:  Jonathan M Holmes; Raymond T Kraker; Roy W Beck; Eileen E Birch; Susan A Cotter; Donald F Everett; Richard W Hertle; Graham E Quinn; Michael X Repka; Mitchell M Scheiman; David K Wallace
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Prevalence and etiology of amblyopia in Southern India: results from screening of school children aged 5-15 years.

Authors:  Sunil Ganekal; Vishal Jhanji; Yuanbo Liang; Syril Dorairaj
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.648

5.  Parents' awareness and perception of children's eye diseases in Chennai, India.

Authors:  Divya Senthilkumar; Sudharsanam Manni Balasubramaniam; Sheela Evangeline Kumaran; Krishna Kumar Ramani
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.973

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Amblyopia screening for first and second-grade children in Jordan.

Authors:  Khalil M Al-Salem; Mohammad S Saleem; Ismat Ereifej; Hamzeh M Alrawashdeh; Rayed Falah Hussein Obeidat; Asma Ali Abdlmohdi; Raeda Zaki Al-Momani; Layal Mohammed Hammad; Omar Ahmad Al-Habahbeh; Yaqeen M Assassfeh; Laith Ramzi Najib Al-Qsous; Ashraf Hatim Adeeb Nasraween; Tariq A AlMaaitah; Deya'-Aldin Muneer Hasan Aqeel; Ibtehal Eyadeh Awad Alabdulrazzg; Abdullah Mahmoud Mohammad Murad; Amany Jehad Faleh Al-Zurqan; Enas Jamal Mohammad Jaradat; Slsabela Emad Suliman Aldhoon; Ala'a Majed Dmour; Ahmad Talal Asassfeh; Jeries Ayman Halaseh; Abdel Aziz Ammar Daoud; Waha Ayman Alkasasbeh; Kholoud Gh Matar
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.