Literature DB >> 30126988

Classification of prostate cancer using a protease activity nanosensor library.

Jaideep S Dudani1,2, Maria Ibrahim1,3, Jesse Kirkpatrick1,3, Andrew D Warren1,3, Sangeeta N Bhatia4,3,5,6,7,8.   

Abstract

Improved biomarkers are needed for prostate cancer, as the current gold standards have poor predictive value. Tests for circulating prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels are susceptible to various noncancer comorbidities in the prostate and do not provide prognostic information, whereas physical biopsies are invasive, must be performed repeatedly, and only sample a fraction of the prostate. Injectable biosensors may provide a new paradigm for prostate cancer biomarkers by querying the status of the prostate via a noninvasive readout. Proteases are an important class of enzymes that play a role in every hallmark of cancer; their activities could be leveraged as biomarkers. We identified a panel of prostate cancer proteases through transcriptomic and proteomic analysis. Using this panel, we developed a nanosensor library that measures protease activity in vitro using fluorescence and in vivo using urinary readouts. In xenograft mouse models, we applied this nanosensor library to classify aggressive prostate cancer and to select predictive substrates. Last, we coformulated a subset of nanosensors with integrin-targeting ligands to increase sensitivity. These targeted nanosensors robustly classified prostate cancer aggressiveness and outperformed PSA. This activity-based nanosensor library could be useful throughout clinical management of prostate cancer, with both diagnostic and prognostic utility.

Entities:  

Keywords:  activity-based nanosensors; diagnostic biomarkers; prognostic biomarkers; prostate cancer; proteolytic enzymes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30126988      PMCID: PMC6130343          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1805337115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  33 in total

1.  Prognostic value of an RNA expression signature derived from cell cycle proliferation genes in patients with prostate cancer: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Jack Cuzick; Gregory P Swanson; Gabrielle Fisher; Arthur R Brothman; Daniel M Berney; Julia E Reid; David Mesher; V O Speights; Elzbieta Stankiewicz; Christopher S Foster; Henrik Møller; Peter Scardino; Jorja D Warren; Jimmy Park; Adib Younus; Darl D Flake; Susanne Wagner; Alexander Gutin; Jerry S Lanchbury; Steven Stone
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  Prostate-specific antigen as a serum marker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  T A Stamey; N Yang; A R Hay; J E McNeal; F S Freiha; E Redwine
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-10-08       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  PPARγ: a molecular link between systemic metabolic disease and benign prostate hyperplasia.

Authors:  Ming Jiang; Douglas W Strand; Omar E Franco; Peter E Clark; Simon W Hayward
Journal:  Differentiation       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.880

4.  Coadministration of a tumor-penetrating peptide enhances the efficacy of cancer drugs.

Authors:  Kazuki N Sugahara; Tambet Teesalu; Priya Prakash Karmali; Venkata Ramana Kotamraju; Lilach Agemy; Daniel R Greenwald; Erkki Ruoslahti
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Imaging active urokinase plasminogen activator in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Aaron M LeBeau; Natalia Sevillano; Kate Markham; Michael B Winter; Stephanie T Murphy; Daniel R Hostetter; James West; Henry Lowman; Charles S Craik; Henry F VanBrocklin
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Transepithelial transport of Fc-targeted nanoparticles by the neonatal fc receptor for oral delivery.

Authors:  Eric M Pridgen; Frank Alexis; Timothy T Kuo; Etgar Levy-Nissenbaum; Rohit Karnik; Richard S Blumberg; Robert Langer; Omid C Farokhzad
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 17.956

7.  Mathematical framework for activity-based cancer biomarkers.

Authors:  Gabriel A Kwong; Jaideep S Dudani; Emmanuel Carrodeguas; Eric V Mazumdar; Seyedeh M Zekavat; Sangeeta N Bhatia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Spontaneous and prostatic steroid binding protein peptide-induced autoimmune prostatitis in the nonobese diabetic mouse.

Authors:  Giuseppe Penna; Susana Amuchastegui; Chiara Cossetti; Francesca Aquilano; Roberto Mariani; Nadia Giarratana; Elena De Carli; Benedetta Fibbi; Luciano Adorini
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 5.422

9.  RGD-Binding Integrins in Prostate Cancer: Expression Patterns and Therapeutic Prospects against Bone Metastasis.

Authors:  Mark Sutherland; Andrew Gordon; Steven D Shnyder; Laurence H Patterson; Helen M Sheldrake
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Comprehensive analysis of normal adjacent to tumor transcriptomes.

Authors:  Dvir Aran; Roman Camarda; Justin Odegaard; Hyojung Paik; Boris Oskotsky; Gregor Krings; Andrei Goga; Marina Sirota; Atul J Butte
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Prostate Cancer Development: Therapeutic Implications.

Authors:  Ugo Testa; Germana Castelli; Elvira Pelosi
Journal:  Medicines (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-30

2.  Cancer Cell-Derived Matrisome Proteins Promote Metastasis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Chenxi Tian; Daniel Öhlund; Steffen Rickelt; Tommy Lidström; Ying Huang; Liangliang Hao; Renee T Zhao; Oskar Franklin; Sangeeta N Bhatia; David A Tuveson; Richard O Hynes
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  An Activity-Based Nanosensor for Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Julia A Kudryashev; Lauren E Waggoner; Hope T Leng; Nicholas H Mininni; Ester J Kwon
Journal:  ACS Sens       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 7.711

Review 4.  Recent Developments in Nanosensors for Imaging Applications in Biological Systems.

Authors:  Guoxin Rong; Erin E Tuttle; Ashlyn Neal Reilly; Heather A Clark
Journal:  Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif)       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 10.745

5.  Theranostic Layer-by-Layer Nanoparticles for Simultaneous Tumor Detection and Gene Silencing.

Authors:  Natalie Boehnke; Santiago Correa; Liangliang Hao; Wade Wang; Joelle P Straehla; Sangeeta N Bhatia; Paula T Hammond
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 6.  Synthetic biomarkers: a twenty-first century path to early cancer detection.

Authors:  Gabriel A Kwong; Sharmistha Ghosh; Lena Gamboa; Christos Patriotis; Sudhir Srivastava; Sangeeta N Bhatia
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Targeting the Extracellular Matrix in Traumatic Brain Injury Increases Signal Generation from an Activity-Based Nanosensor.

Authors:  Rebecca M Kandell; Julia A Kudryashev; Ester J Kwon
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 15.881

8.  Urinary detection of lung cancer in mice via noninvasive pulmonary protease profiling.

Authors:  Jesse D Kirkpatrick; Andrew D Warren; Ava P Soleimany; Peter M K Westcott; Justin C Voog; Carmen Martin-Alonso; Heather E Fleming; Tuomas Tammela; Tyler Jacks; Sangeeta N Bhatia
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 9.  Activity-Based Diagnostics: An Emerging Paradigm for Disease Detection and Monitoring.

Authors:  Ava P Soleimany; Sangeeta N Bhatia
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2020-04-05       Impact factor: 11.951

10.  Activatable Zymography Probes Enable In Situ Localization of Protease Dysregulation in Cancer.

Authors:  Ava P Soleimany; Jesse D Kirkpatrick; Susan Su; Jaideep S Dudani; Qian Zhong; Ahmet Bekdemir; Sangeeta N Bhatia
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 12.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.