Literature DB >> 30126953

Plasma and Intrapulmonary Concentrations of ETX2514 and Sulbactam following Intravenous Administration of ETX2514SUL to Healthy Adult Subjects.

Keith A Rodvold1, Mark H Gotfried2,3, Robin D Isaacs4, John P O'Donnell4, Emily Stone4.   

Abstract

ETX2514 is a novel β-lactamase inhibitor that broadly inhibits Ambler class A, C, and D β-lactamases. ETX2514 combined with sulbactam (SUL) in vitro restores sulbactam activity against Acinetobacter baumannii ETX2514-sulbactam (ETX2514SUL) is under development for the treatment of A. baumannii infections. The objective of this study was to determine and compare plasma, epithelial lining fluid (ELF), and alveolar macrophage (AM) concentrations following intravenous (i.v.) ETX2514 and sulbactam. Plasma, ELF, and AM concentrations of ETX2514 and sulbactam were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) in 30 healthy adult subjects following repeated dosing (ETX2514 [1 g] and sulbactam [1 g] every 6 h [q6h], as a 3-h i.v. infusion, for a total of 3 doses). A bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed once in each subject at either 1, 2.5, 3.25, 4, or 6 h after the start of the last infusion. Penetration ratios were calculated from area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 6 h (AUC0-6) values for total plasma and ELF using mean and median concentrations at the BAL fluid sampling times. Respective ELF AUC0-6 values, based on mean and median concentrations, were 40.1 and 39.4 mg · h/liter for ETX2514 and 34.7 and 34.5 mg · h/liter for sulbactam. Respective penetration ratios of ELF to total/unbound plasma concentrations, based on mean and median AUC0-6 values, of ETX2514 were 0.37/0.41 and 0.36/0.40, whereas these same ratio values were 0.50/0.81 and 0.50/0.80 for sulbactam. ETX2514 and sulbactam concentrations in AM were measurable and fairly constant throughout the dosing interval (median values of 1.31 and 1.01 mg/liter, respectively). These data support further study of ETX2514SUL for the treatment of pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant A. baumannii (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT03303924.).
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ETX2514; ETX2514SUL; alveolar macrophages; epithelial lining fluid; pharmacokinetics; sulbactam

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30126953      PMCID: PMC6201107          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01089-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  31 in total

1.  Penetration of ampicillin and sulbactam in the lower airways during respiratory infections.

Authors:  Y J Valcke; M T Rosseel; R A Pauwels; M G Bogaert; M E Van der Straeten
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Secular trends in Acinetobacter baumannii resistance in respiratory and blood stream specimens in the United States, 2003 to 2012: A survey study.

Authors:  Marya D Zilberberg; Marin H Kollef; Andrew F Shorr
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.960

3.  Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation of sulbactam against Acinetobacter baumannii in in vitro and murine thigh and lung infection models.

Authors:  Yuta Yokoyama; Kazuaki Matsumoto; Kazuro Ikawa; Erika Watanabe; Akari Shigemi; Yasuhiro Umezaki; Koyo Nakamura; Keiichiro Ueno; Norifumi Morikawa; Yasuo Takeda
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 5.283

Review 4.  Novel Beta-Lactamase Inhibitors: Unlocking Their Potential in Therapy.

Authors:  Darren Wong; David van Duin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Steady-state plasma and bronchopulmonary concentrations of intravenous levofloxacin and azithromycin in healthy adults.

Authors:  Keith A Rodvold; Larry H Danziger; Mark H Gotfried
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Comparison of piperacillin exposure in the lungs of critically ill patients and healthy volunteers.

Authors:  T W Felton; K Ogungbenro; E Boselli; W W Hope; K A Rodvold
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 7.  Antibiotic resistance of pathogenic Acinetobacter species and emerging combination therapy.

Authors:  Bora Shin; Woojun Park
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 3.422

Review 8.  Carbapenem resistance and mortality in patients with Acinetobacter baumannii infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  E V Lemos; F P de la Hoz; T R Einarson; W F McGhan; E Quevedo; C Castañeda; K Kawai
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 8.067

Review 9.  Biology of Acinetobacter baumannii: Pathogenesis, Antibiotic Resistance Mechanisms, and Prospective Treatment Options.

Authors:  Chang-Ro Lee; Jung Hun Lee; Moonhee Park; Kwang Seung Park; Il Kwon Bae; Young Bae Kim; Chang-Jun Cha; Byeong Chul Jeong; Sang Hee Lee
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 5.293

10.  Prevalence of Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections in the United States Predominated by Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Bin Cai; Roger Echols; Glenn Magee; Juan Camilo Arjona Ferreira; Gareth Morgan; Mari Ariyasu; Takuko Sawada; Tsutae Den Nagata
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 3.835

View more
  16 in total

1.  In Vitro Activity of Sulbactam-Durlobactam against Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus Complex Isolates Collected Globally in 2016 and 2017.

Authors:  Sarah M McLeod; Samir H Moussa; Meredith A Hackel; Alita A Miller
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Multidrug Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: Resistance by Any Other Name Would Still be Hard to Treat.

Authors:  David A Butler; Mark Biagi; Xing Tan; Samah Qasmieh; Zackery P Bulman; Eric Wenzler
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 3.725

3.  Prediction of Tissue Exposures of Meropenem, Colistin, and Sulbactam in Pediatrics Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling.

Authors:  Shixing Zhu; Jiayuan Zhang; Zhihua Lv; Peijuan Zhu; Charles Oo; Mingming Yu; Sherwin K B Sy
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 5.577

4.  Plasma and Intrapulmonary Concentrations of Tebipenem following Oral Administration of Tebipenem Pivoxil Hydrobromide to Healthy Adult Subjects.

Authors:  Keith A Rodvold; Mark H Gotfried; Vipul Gupta; Amanda Ek; Praveen Srivastava; Angela Talley; Jon Bruss
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 5.938

Review 5.  Durlobactam in the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Infections: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Guido Granata; Fabrizio Taglietti; Francesco Schiavone; Nicola Petrosillo
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 4.964

6.  Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Intravenous Durlobactam and Sulbactam in Subjects with Renal Impairment and Healthy Matched Control Subjects.

Authors:  John O'Donnell; Richard A Preston; Grigor Mamikonyan; Emily Stone; Robin Isaacs
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Antibiotic resistance breakers: current approaches and future directions.

Authors:  Mark Laws; Ali Shaaban; Khondaker Miraz Rahman
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 16.408

8.  Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Intravenous Sulbactam-Durlobactam with Imipenem-Cilastatin in Hospitalized Adults with Complicated Urinary Tract Infections, Including Acute Pyelonephritis.

Authors:  Olexiy Sagan; Ruslan Yakubsevitch; Krassimir Yanev; Roman Fomkin; Emily Stone; Daniel Hines; John O'Donnell; Alita Miller; Robin Isaacs; Subasree Srinivasan
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  A randomized, double-blind, placebo- and positive-controlled crossover study of the effects of durlobactam on cardiac repolarization in healthy subjects.

Authors:  John O'Donnell; Kathleen Maloney; Melissa Steidler; Royce Morrison; Robin Isaacs
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 4.689

10.  Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Drug-Drug Interaction Potential of Intravenous Durlobactam, a β-Lactamase Inhibitor, in Healthy Subjects.

Authors:  Jason D Lickliter; Kenneth Lawrence; John O'Donnell; Robin Isaacs
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.