Literature DB >> 30126781

A randomized clinical trial evaluating negative pressure therapy to decrease vascular groin incision complications.

Jeontaik Kwon1, Cara Staley1, Megan McCullough1, Selena Goss1, Mariano Arosemena1, Babak Abai1, Dawn Salvatore1, David Reiter1, Paul DiMuzio2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Vascular groin incision complications contribute significantly to patients' morbidity and rising health care costs. Negative pressure therapy over the closed incision decreases the infection rate in cardiac and orthopedic procedures. This study prospectively evaluated negative pressure therapy as a means to decrease wound complications and associated health care costs.
METHODS: This was a randomized, prospective, single-institution study of 119 femoral incisions closed primarily after elective vascular surgery including both inflow (eg, aortofemoral) and outflow (eg, femoral-popliteal bypass) procedures. Incisions were categorized as high risk for wound complications on the basis of body mass index >30 kg/m2, pannus, reoperation, prosthetic graft, poor nutrition, immunosuppression, or hemoglobin A1c >8% and randomized 1:1 to standard gauze (n = 60) dressing vs negative pressure therapy (Prevena [Acelity, San Antonio, Tex], n = 59). Wound complication rate, length of stay (LOS), reoperation, readmission, and variable hospital costs were determined during 30 days. Statistical analysis was performed using χ2 test along with a two-sample unpaired t-test for continuous variables.
RESULTS: There were no significant demographic differences (age, sex, risk factors for wound complication) between the two high-risk groups. In low-risk controls, the major wound complication rate was 4.8% (involving one infection in 21 incisions), resulting in a 3.8-day LOS, 4.8% reoperation, 4.8% readmission rate, and $17,599 in average variable cost. For high-risk controls, there was a significant increase in major wound complications to 25% (including all 12 infections in 60 incisions), LOS (10.6 days), reoperation (18.3%), readmission (16.7%), and costs ($36,537). Finally, negative pressure therapy significantly reduced major wound complications to 8.5% (including five of six infections in 59 incisions; P < .001), reoperation (8.5%; P < .05), and readmission (6.8%; P < .04) but not LOS (10.6 days). The average variable cost was reduced ($30,492), yielding an average savings of $6045 per patient (P = .11).
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that negative pressure therapy significantly reduces the major wound complication, reoperation, and readmission rates for patients at high risk for groin wound complications. Furthermore, this therapy may lead to a reduction in hospital costs. Negative pressure therapy for all groin incisions considered at high risk for wound complications is recommended.
Copyright © 2018 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Negative pressure therapy; Vascular groin incision complications; Wound infection

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30126781     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.05.224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  12 in total

1.  Outcomes of incisional negative pressure wound therapy following brachiobasilic transposition arteriovenous fistula creation: A 1:2 propensity score matched study.

Authors:  Kai Siang Chan; Muthaiah Arunaachalam; Qiantai Hong; En Ming Yong; Pravin Lingam; Li Zhang; Sadhana Chandrasekar; Glenn Wei Leong Tan; Zhiwen Joseph Lo
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.

Authors:  Gill Norman; Chunhu Shi; En Lin Goh; Elizabeth Ma Murphy; Adam Reid; Laura Chiverton; Monica Stankiewicz; Jo C Dumville
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-04-26

3.  Utilization of a Novel Negative Pressure Platform Wound Dressing on Surgical Incisions: A Case Series.

Authors:  Laura E Cooper; Megan C O'Toole; Kristopher L Fields; Elof K Eriksson; Rodney K Chan
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-03-11

4.  Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.

Authors:  Joan Webster; Zhenmi Liu; Gill Norman; Jo C Dumville; Laura Chiverton; Paul Scuffham; Monica Stankiewicz; Wendy P Chaboyer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-03-26

5.  Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.

Authors:  Gill Norman; En Lin Goh; Jo C Dumville; Chunhu Shi; Zhenmi Liu; Laura Chiverton; Monica Stankiewicz; Adam Reid
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-05-01

Review 6.  Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy: Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Luis G Fernandez; Marc R Matthews; Pablo Sibaja Alvarez; Scott Norwood; David H Villarreal
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-07-21

7.  Silver in Wound Care-Friend or Foe?: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Ibrahim Khansa; Anna R Schoenbrunner; Casey T Kraft; Jeffrey E Janis
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-08-12

8.  Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.

Authors:  Gill Norman; En Lin Goh; Jo C Dumville; Chunhu Shi; Zhenmi Liu; Laura Chiverton; Monica Stankiewicz; Adam Reid
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-06-15

9.  Assessment of Silver Levels in a Closed-Incision Negative Pressure Therapy Dressing: In Vitro and In Vivo Study.

Authors:  Prathamesh M Kharkar; Sandra N Osborne; Scout L Stern; Aaron Pleitner; K Mark Wiencek; Kristine M Kieswetter
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 10.  Clinical Applications and Benefits of Using Closed-incision Negative Pressure Therapy with Novel Dressing: A Review Article.

Authors:  Dennis Adjepong; Bilal Haider Malik
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-02-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.