| Literature DB >> 30126390 |
Huixing Lin1, Hong Zhou1, Lu Gao1, Bin Li2, Kongwang He2, Hongjie Fan3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: As the major causative agent of swine viral diarrhea, porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) has caused massive losses to the economies of swine raising countries. Accordingly, the serological detection of corresponding antibodies would be beneficial to diagnose PEDV indirectly to control the disease. In this study, an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) based on the recombinant truncated spike (S) protein of PEDV was developed and validated.Entities:
Keywords: ELISA; Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus; Spike protein
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30126390 PMCID: PMC6102851 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-018-1570-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Fig. 1Amplification, SDS-PAGE and western blotting analysis of the recombinant protein S1. a RT-PCR amplification of the truncated S1 gene fragment. Lane M, DL2000 DNA marker. Lane 1 and 2, the truncated S1 gene fragment. b Identifiction of the recombinant expression plasmid 28a-S1 by double enzyme digestion. Lane M, DL5000 DNA marker. Lane 1, the recombinant expression plasmid 28a-S1 digested by BamH I/Sal I. c SDS-PAGE analysis of S1 protein. Lane M, prestained protein molecular weight standard. Lane 1, transformed cells of BL21/pET-28a(+) after IPTG induction for 6 h. Lane 2, transformed cells of BL21/28a-S1 after IPTG induction for 6 h. Lane 3, purified recombinant protein S1 by affinity chromatography of Ni-NTA spin column. d Western blotting analysis of S1 protein. Lane M, prestained protein molecular weight standard. Lane 1, E. coli BL21 with empty vector pET-28a(+) reacted with polyclonal mouse anti-PEDV antibody. Lane 2, purified S1 protein reacted with polyclonal mouse anti-PEDV antibody. A prominent band with the expected size 42 kDa appeared after incubation
Checkerboard titration of the recombinant protein S1
| OD450 ratio (P/N) | Dilution of serum sample | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P/N | 1:20 | 1:40 | 1:80 | 1:160 | 1:320 | |
| Concentrations of antigen (μg/mL) | 10 | 1.233/0.185 | 0.980/0.100 | 0.730/0.082 | 0.551/0.052 | 0.401/0.041 |
| 6.665 | 9.80 | 8.902 | 10.596 | 9.780 | ||
| 7.5 | 1.118/0.150 | 0.942/0.092 | 0.631/0.075 | 0.459/0.047 | 0.309/0.029 | |
| 7.453 | 10.239 | 8.413 | 9.766 | 10.655 | ||
| 5.0 | 1.102/0.141 | 0.854/0.077 | 0.591/0.067 | 0.388/0.042 | 0.228/0.022 | |
| 7.816 | 11.091 | 8.821 | 9.238 | 10.364 | ||
| 2.5 | 1.032/0.120 | 0.832/0.073 | 0.547/0.063 | 0.335/0.040 | 0.195/0.019 | |
| 8.600 | 11.397 | 8.683 | 8.375 | 10.263 | ||
| 1.0 | 0.927/0.112 | 0.753/0.071 | 0.473/0.057 | 0.316/0.037 | 0.183/0.017 | |
| 8.277 | 10.606 | 8.298 | 8.541 | 10.765 | ||
| 0.5 | 0.818/0.103 | 0.714/0.068 | 0.447/0.055 | 0.292/0.033 | 0.171/0.016 | |
| 7.942 | 10.500 | 8.127 | 8.848 | 10.688 | ||
Comparison of the S1 indirect ELISA with the IFA
| IFA results | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | Total | ||
| S1 indirect ELISA results | Positive | 206 | 7 | 213 |
| Negative | 5 | 150 | 155 | |
| Total | 211 | 157 | 368 | |
| Data analysis | Sensitivity | 96.71% | ||
| Specificity | 96.77% | |||
| Coincidence rate | 96.74% | |||
Detection rates of anti-PEDV antibodies in field serum samples
| PEDV exposure | PoRV/TGEV exposure | No. samples | No. positive | Positive rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exposed | Non-exposed | 1125 | 1027 | 91.29% |
| Non-exposed | Non-exposed | 482 | 31 | 6.43% |
| Non-exposed | Exposed | 149 | 16 | 10.74% |
| Non-exposed | Exposed | 195 | 27 | 13.85% |
| Unknown | Unknown | 1353 | 491 | 36.29% |
Samples were collected from farms with known or unknown PEDV exposure as determined by real-time RT-PCR of fecal samples
Fig. 2Determination of IgA and IgG in the sera of PEDV immunized pigs. The sera of PEDV immunized pigs were tested by this S1 indirect ELISA at 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42 and 49 day post-inoculation (dpi). Both the IgA and the IgG were positive at 7 dpi. The IgG could exist in the sera for longer time than IgA. Different letters (a, and b) indicate significant difference between the groups