| Literature DB >> 30126381 |
Naser Kalantari1, Nastaran Keshavarz Mohammadi2, Pantea Izadi3, Maryam Gholamalizadeh4, Saeid Doaei5,6,7, Hassan Eini-Zinab1, Tuire Salonurmi8, Shahram Rafieifar9, Reza Janipoor10, Ghasem Azizi Tabesh11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The underlying mechanism of the effect of FTO genotype on body mass index (BMI) and body composition is unknown. The objective of the study was to investigate the association of FTO gene polymorphisms with anthropometric indices in adolescent boys after adjustments for dietary intake and physical activity.Entities:
Keywords: Anthropometry; Fat mass and obesity associated (FTO); Haplotypes; SNPs
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30126381 PMCID: PMC6102807 DOI: 10.1186/s12881-018-0664-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Genet ISSN: 1471-2350 Impact factor: 2.103
General characteristics of cases and controls
| No overweight ( | Overweight ( | Obese ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 14.2 ± 0.9 | 13.8 ± 1.1 | 14.4 ±2.2 | 0.12 |
| Physical activity (MET-minutes per week) | 1218 ± 168.7 | 1006 ± 71.8 | 1004 ± 85.6 | 0.78 |
| Calorie intake (kcal) | 2388 ± 869.6 | 2399 ± 854.9 | 2475 ± 858.3 | 0.08 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 18.8 ± 2.1 | 23.91.7 | 29.8 ± 3.1 | < 0.001 |
| FM (%) | 13.6 ± 4.9 | 23.2 ± 6.1 | 31.1 ± 5.3 | < 0.001 |
| SM (%) | 39.9 ± 2.8 | 36.9 ± 2.3 | 33.5 ± 2.7 | < 0.001 |
| Weight (kg) | 51.1 ± 10.2 | 68.1 ± 10.8 | 85.7 ± 12.7 | < 0.001 |
| Height (cm) | 176 ± 13.8 | 169 ± 9.1 | 167 ± 16.5 | 0.83 |
| GG genotype (%) | 18.9 | 45.9 | 35.2 | < 0.001 |
Comparisons were made using ANOVA
Distribution of the risk genotype of FTO polymorphisms across different categories of BMI
| No overweight (n = 122) | Overweight (n = 62) | Obese (n = 48) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The rs9930506 GG genotype (%) | 18.9 | 45.9 | 35.2 | < 0.001 |
| The rs993275 GG genotype (%) | 18.9 | 45.9 | 35.2 | < 0.001 |
| The rs9930501 CC genotype (%) | 18.9 | 45.9 | 35.2 | < 0.001 |
Multivariable-adjusted odds ratios for the risk genotype of FTO across categories of BMI
| No overweight (n = 122) | Overweight (n = 62) | Obese (n = 48) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude | 1 | 6.26 (2.43–16.11) | 6.15 (2.28–16.63) | < 0.001 |
| Model 1 | 1 | 6.24 (2.42–16.1) | 5.87 (2.16–15.99) | < 0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1 | 6.35 (2.44–16.51) | 6.03 (2.19–16.58) | < 0.001 |
Model1: adjusted for age
Model2: additionally, adjusted for calorie intake and physical activity
Multivariable-adjusted odds ratios for the risk genotype of FTO across categories of BF
| Low BF | Normal BF | High BF | Very high BF | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude | 1 | 3.23 (0.72–14.52) | 8.40 (1.53–46.23) | 9.54 (0.92–47.44) | 0.004 |
| Model 1 | 1 | 3.01 (0.66–13.65) | 7.87 (1.42–43.6) | 9.12 (1.83–45.5) | 0.005 |
| Model 2 | 1 | 3.07 (0.07–1.5) | 7.87 (1.41–44.01) | 9.26 (1.85–46.38) | 0.006 |
Model1: adjusted for age
Model2: additionally, adjusted for calorie intake and physical activity
Multivariable-adjusted odds ratios for the risk genotype of FTO across categories of SM
| Low or normal SM (SM < percentile 98) | High SM (SM ≥ percentile 98) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Crude | 1 | 0.28 (0.12–0.62) | 0.001 |
| Model 1 | 1 | 0.26 (0.11–0.59) | 0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1 | 0.26 (0.11–0.59) | 0.001 |
Model1: adjusted for age
Model2: additionally adjusted for calorie intake and physical activity