| Literature DB >> 30126169 |
Young-In Kim1,2, Won-Seok Oh3, Phil Hyun Song4, Sungho Yun5, Young-Sam Kwon6, Young Joon Lee7, Sae-Kwang Ku8, Chang-Hyun Song9, Tae-Ho Oh10.
Abstract
Ultraviolet (UV) B exposure induces DNA damage and production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which causes skin photoaging through signaling pathways of inflammation and modulation of extracellular matrix remodeling proteins, collagens, and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP). As low molecular-weight fucoidan (LMF) has potential antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, we examined the protective effects of LMF against UVB-induced photoaging. A UVB-irradiated mouse model was topically treated with myricetin or LMF at 2.0, 1.0 and 0.2 mg/cm² (LMF2.0, LMF1.0 and LMF0.2, respectively) once a day for 15 weeks. Wrinkle formation, inflammation, oxidative stress, MMP expression, and apoptosis in the treated regions were compared with those in a distilled water-treated photoaging model (UVB control). LMF treatments, particularly LMF2.0 and LMF1.0, significantly inhibited the wrinkle formation, skin edema, and neutrophil recruitment into the photo-damaged lesions, compared with those in the UVB control. While LMF decreased interleukin (IL)-1β release, it increased IL-10. The LMF treatment inhibited the oxidative stresses (malondialdehyde and superoxide anion) and enhanced endogenous antioxidants (glutathione). Additionally, LMF reduced the mRNA expression of MMP-1, 9, and 13. The histopathological analyses revealed the anti-photoaging effects of LMF exerted via its antioxidant, anti-apoptotic, and MMP-9-inhibiting effects. These suggest that LMF can be used as a skin-protective remedy for photoaging.Entities:
Keywords: MMP; UVB; anti-inflammation; antioxidant; fucoidan; low molecular-weight; skin-aging
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30126169 PMCID: PMC6117676 DOI: 10.3390/md16080286
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1Non-irradiated normal mice and one group of UV (ultraviolet) B-irradiated mice were topically treated with distilled water (Intact and UVB control, respectively). The other four groups of UVB-irradiated mice were treated with myricetin (Myricetin) or low molecular-weight fucoidan (LMF) at 2.0, 1.0, and 0.2 mg/cm2 (LMF2.0, LMF1.0, and LMF0.2, respectively). The body weights were measured every week after treatment, and expressed as means ± SD of eight mice per group.
Figure 2After treatments for 15 weeks, the left dorsal back skin (upper) and its replicas (lower) were observed (A). Scale bars indicate 10 mm. Wrinkle length (B) and depth (C) were assessed from the skin replicas. The dermal tissues were sampled and weighed (D). Values were expressed as means ± SD of 8 mice per group. ‡ p < 0.01 vs. intact and ** p < 0.01 vs. UVB control.
Figure 3After treatments for 15 weeks, myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity (neutrophils × 105 per mg of tissue protein, A) and skin levels of IL-1β and IL-10 (pg per 100 mg of protein, B and C, respectively) were assessed in UVB-irradiated skins. Values were expressed as means ± SD of 8 mice per group. ‡ p < 0.01, † p < 0.05 vs. intact, and ** p < 0.01 vs. UVB control.
Antioxidant activities in ultraviolet (UV) B-irradiated skins.
| GSH (μM/mg) | MDA (nM/mg) | Superoxide Anion (NBT Reduction) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intact | 1.47 ± 0.62 | 0.34 ± 0.11 | 0.36 ± 0.08 |
| UVB control | 0.41 ± 0.09 ‡ | 1.68 ± 0.41 ‡ | 1.03 ± 0.18 ‡ |
| Myricetin | 0.95 ± 0.15 †,** | 0.69 ± 0.20 ‡,** | 0.56 ± 0.16 ‡,** |
| LMF2.0 | 1.44 ± 0.14 ** | 0.40 ± 0.10 ** | 0.36 ± 0.08 ** |
| LMF1.0 | 1.36 ± 0.20 ** | 0.51 ± 0.13 †,** | 0.49 ± 0.08 †,** |
| LMF0.2 | 0.94 ± 0.18 †,** | 0.67 ± 0.13 ‡,** | 0.56 ± 0.15 ‡,** |
Non-irradiated normal group and one group of UVB-irradiated mice were topically treated with distilled water (intact and UVB control, respectively). The other four groups of UVB-irradiated mice were treated with myricetin at 0.32 ng/cm2 (Myricetin) or low molecular-weight fucoidan (LMF) at 2.0, 1.0, and 0.2 mg/cm2 (LMF2.0, LMF1.0, and LMF0.2, respectively). After treatment for 15 weeks, the glutathione (GSH), malondialdehyde (MDA) and superoxide anions were assessed in the skin tissues and they were normalized to the tissue proteins. Values are expressed as means ± SD of eight mice. NBT = nitroblue tetrazolium. ‡: p < 0.01 and †: p < 0.05 vs. intact, and **: p < 0.01 vs. UVB control.
Tissue mRNA expressions in UVB-irradiated skins.
| MMP-1 | MMP-9 | MMP-13 | GSH Reductase | Nox2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intact | 1.04 ± 0.09 | 1.07 ± 0.10 | 1.06 ± 0.07 | 1.01 ± 0.09 | 1.01 ± 0.08 |
| UVB control | 2.02 ± 0.20 ‡ | 1.93 ± 0.23 ‡ | 2.29 ± 0.25 ‡ | 0.79 ± 0.15 ‡ | 1.71 ± 0.22 ‡ |
| Myricetin | 1.34 ± 0.18 ‡,** | 1.31 ± 0.14 ‡,** | 1.47 ± 0.21 ‡,** | 1.28 ± 0.16 ‡,** | 1.22 ± 0.14 ‡,** |
| LMF2.0 | 1.06 ± 0.09 ** | 1.12 ± 0.08 ** | 1.15 ± 0.07 †,** | 1.93 ± 0.19 ‡,** | 1.06 ± 0.08 ** |
| LMF1.0 | 1.20 ± 0.09 †,** | 1.16 ± 0.09 †,** | 1.26 ± 0.05 ‡,** | 1.58 ± 0.36 ‡,** | 1.12 ± 0.08 †,** |
| LMF0.2 | 1.33 ± 0.14 ‡,** | 1.28 ± 0.09 ‡,** | 1.47 ± 0.17 ‡,** | 1.30 ± 0.12 ‡,** | 1.22 ± 0.05 ‡,** |
After treatment for 15 weeks, expressions of mRNA for matrix metalloprotease (MMP)-1, -9, and -13, GSH reductase and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase 2 (Nox2) were assessed. Values are expressed as means ± SD of eight mice for relative mRNA expressions per β-actin. ‡: p < 0.01, †: p < 0.05 vs. intact, and **: p < 0.01 vs. UVB control.
Figure 4Skin tissue sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin or Masson’s trichrome (MT). Arrows indicate epithelial microfolds formed. Scale bars indicate 100 μm.
Histopathological changes on UVB-irradiated skins.
| Microfolds (Folds/mm) | Epi. Thickness (μm) | IF Cells (Cells/mm2) | Collagen Fiber (%/mm2) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intact | 10.50 ± 3.63 | 20.54 ± 2.52 | 9.50 ± 2.98 | 45.31 ± 5.75 |
| UVB control | 74.75 ± 10.94 ‡ | 48.28 ± 5.04 ‡ | 269.50 ± 50.65 ‡ | 82.54 ± 8.20 ‡ |
| Myricetin | 39.50 ± 13.73 ‡,** | 30.26 ± 5.08 ‡,** | 204.50 ± 51.29 ‡,* | 59.32 ± 6.17 ‡,** |
| LMF2.0 | 19.63 ± 4.17 ‡,** | 26.75 ± 4.04 ‡,** | 31.00 ± 7.19 ‡,** | 48.44 ± 2.97 ** |
| LMF1.0 | 38.63 ± 5.10 ‡,** | 30.63 ± 2.04 ‡,** | 61.25 ± 14.57 ‡,** | 55.72 ± 7.89 ‡,** |
| LMF0.2 | 56.88 ± 5.99 ‡,** | 32.89 ± 3.83 ‡,** | 140.00 ± 38.37 ‡,** | 59.77 ± 8.94 ‡,** |
After treatments for 15 weeks, microfolds, epithelial (Epi.) thickness, and inflammatory (IF) cells were assessed in hematoxylin-eosin stains in Figure 4, and relative regions of collagen fiber was assessed in Masson’s trichrome stains. Values are expressed as means ± SD of eight mice. ‡: p < 0.01 vs. intact, **: p < 0.01, and *: p < 0.05 vs. UVB control.
Figure 5Skin tissue sections were immunostained for nitrotyrosine and 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE), as markers of oxidative stress; caspase-3 and poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) as markers of apoptosis; and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9. Next, the sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. Scale bars indicate 50 μm.
Immunohistochemistry in UVB-irradiated skins.
| Nitrotyrosine | 4-HNE | Caspase-3 | PARP | MMP-9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intact | 12.00 ± 4.21 | 12.50 ± 3.07 | 17.38 ± 3.25 | 15.13 ± 3.04 | 31.25 ± 8.58 |
| UVB control | 86.88 ± 10.11 ‡ | 78.00 ± 10.72 ‡ | 83.50 ± 10.17 ‡ | 79.13 ± 11.00 ‡ | 81.75 ±11.62 ‡ |
| Myricetin | 50.00 ± 6.70 ‡,** | 43.13 ± 12.17 ‡,** | 32.00 ± 6.55 ‡,** | 38.88 ± 8.01 ‡,** | 51.88 ± 8.04 ‡,** |
| LMF2.0 | 21.38 ± 4.44 ‡,** | 19.50 ± 2.56 ‡,** | 21.13 ± 2.90 †,** | 21.13 ± 2.53 ‡,** | 43.00 ± 5.13 ‡,** |
| LMF1.0 | 36.25 ± 5.65 ‡,** | 33.00 ± 3.70 ‡,** | 26.13 ± 4.22 ‡,** | 23.88 ± 3.14 ‡,** | 48.63 ± 5.01 ‡,** |
| LMF0.2 | 50.25 ± 6.11 ‡,** | 39.75 ± 4.53 ‡,** | 30.25 ± 3.20 ‡,** | 36.75 ± 5.01 ‡,** | 53.00 ± 8.02 ‡,** |
After treatments for 15 weeks, immunostains in Figure 5 were examined; immunostains for nitrotyrosine, 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE), and caspase-3 and cleaved poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) were assessed as epidermal immunoreactive cells per 100 epithelial cells, and matrix metalloprotease (MMP)-9 was assessed as relative immunoreactive regions per regions of interests (%). Values are expressed as means ± SD of eight mice. ‡: p < 0.01, †: p < 0.05 vs. intact, and **: p < 0.01 vs. UVB control.