| Literature DB >> 30126123 |
Sergio Calixto1, Nina Ganzherli2, Sergey Gulyaev3, Susana Figueroa-Gerstenmaier4.
Abstract
Because this issue journal is dedicated to Gelatin, here we present a few applications of gelatin in the field of optics. Optics is the science that studies the production, propagation, interaction and detection of light. Various materials sensitive to light (photosensitive) are used for detection of light, such as photomultipliers, CCDs, crystals, two dimensional (2D) materials and more. Among the 2D materials, the most popular for several centuries has been gelatin based photographic emulsion, which records spatial distributions of light. More recently (1970), films made of Gelatin with Dichromate (DCG) and dyes have been used. We describe some characteristics and applications of these two photosensitive materials. We also describe examples where gelatin is used as a Relative Humidity (RH) sensor and in the fabrication of optical elements based on gelatin. This article is intended for researchers outside the optics community.Entities:
Keywords: Weigert effect; dichromated gelatin; diffraction efficiency; dyed gelatin; gelatin; holographic structures; photodestruction; photosensitive materials; selective tanning; short-wave UV radiation; silver halide photographic emulsion
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30126123 PMCID: PMC6222838 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23082064
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Light intensity as a function of Relative Humidity when a thin layer of gelatin was used as the humidity sensor.
Figure 2Creation of surface relief (a) during selective tanning and by destructive effect of UV radiation (b) on silver-halide photoemulsions and (c) on layers of DCG.
Parameters of the regular holographic structures on silver halide photoemulsions and DCG.
| # | Type of Gelatin-Containing Recording Medium | Layer Thickness, μm | Type of Structure | Maximum Achieved Value of the Height of the Relief | Maximum Obtained Diffraction Efficiency η1max, % for λ = 0.6328 µm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Photoplates VRL Russia | 14–18 | Fresnel zone plate 0–57 L/mm | 1.2–2 | 34 |
|
| Photoplates VRL | 14–18 | Grating 110 L/mm | 1.1 | 17 |
|
| Photoplates VRL | 14–18 | Grating 110 L/mm | 0.63 | 21.1 |
|
| Photoplates PFG-01, Slavich | 7 | Grating 65 L/mm | 1.35 | 28.5 |
|
| Photoplates PFG-01 | 7 | microlens array 10 L/mm | 2.6–2.8 | - |
|
| Photoplates Agfa-Gevaert 8E75 | 6–7 | grating 40 L/mm | 1.54 | - |
|
| Photoplates Аgfa-Gevaert Millimask | 5 | Grating 130 L/mm | 1.4 | 23 |
|
| Photoplates Kodak HR | 5 | Grating 130 L/mm | 1.2 | 25 |
|
| Photoplates SRBSh (Kurchatov Institute of Atomic Energy), Russia | 1.8 | Grating 130 L/mm | - | 24 |
|
| DCG layer | 51–86 | Grating 103 L/mm | 1.35–1.45 | 25 |
|
| DCG layer | 0.6–1.1 | Grating 103 L/mm | 0.6–0.9 | 28–30 |
|
| Structure transfer from the DCG layer to the PMMA substrate | 0.3–5 | Grating 103 L/mm | 0.48–1.3 | 8–25 |
Parameters of holographic diffusers.
| Sample No. | The Average Thickness of the Photographic Emulsions after Processing by the SWUV Method, µm | σ, µm |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1.4 | 0.54 | 1.9 | 0.12 |
|
| 2.4 | 0.36 | 1.5 | 0.079 |
|
| 3.4 | 0.41 | 1.8 | 0.057 |
Figure 3Microphotograph of holographic Fresnel Zone Plate, including the area with period doubling.