Literature DB >> 30126053

Persistent muscle-invasive bladder cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: an analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare data.

Giulia Lane1,2, Michael Risk1,2, Yunhua Fan1, Suprita Krishna1, Badrinath Konety1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether patients with persistent muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) after undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and radical cystectomy (RC) have worse overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) than patients with similar pathology who undergo RC alone.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database, we identified the records of patients with pT2-4N0M0 disease who underwent RC, with and without NAC, for MIBC between 2004 and 2011. To evaluate survival outcomes in those with MIBC after NAC vs patients with MIBC who underwent RC alone, we used Kaplan-Meier time-to-event analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression modelling. Landmark analysis was conducted to mitigate immortal time bias. Propensity scoring was used to decrease the risk of selection bias.
RESULTS: Of the 1 886 patients with persistent pT2-4 disease at the time of RC, 1505 underwent RC alone and 381 received NAC + RC. After adjusting for confounders, the propensity-weighted risk of death from bladder cancer after diagnosis did not differ between the groups (hazard ratio [HR] 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-1.08; P = 0.23); however, the risk of death from all causes was worse in the RC-alone group (HR 0.79, 95% CI0.67-0.94; P = 0.006).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who had persistent MIBC after platinum-based NAC + RC vs RC alone derived an OS benefit but not a CSS benefit from NAC. This may represent a selection bias favouring patients who were selected for NAC; however, the OS benefit was not evident in patients with persistent pT3-T4N0M0 disease. This study underscores the importance of future research investigating methods to identify patients who will respond to NAC for bladder cancer. It also highlights the need to consider adjuvant therapy in patients who have persistent MIBC after NAC.
© 2018 The Authors BJU International © 2018 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results; cystectomy; neoadjuvant therapy; urinary bladder neoplasms

Year:  2018        PMID: 30126053     DOI: 10.1111/bju.14529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  4 in total

1.  Development of a radiomic signature for predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Ambica Parmar; Abdul Aziz Qazi; Audrius Stundzia; Hao-Wen Sim; Jeremy Lewin; Ur Metser; Martin O'Malley; Aaron R Hansen
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Different Stages of Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shuai Liu; Yu Yao; Fengju Guan; Lijiang Sun; Guiming Zhang
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 3.434

3.  Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on overall survival of patients with T2-4aN0M0 bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis according to EAU COVID-19 recommendation.

Authors:  Dong Hyuk Kang; Kang Su Cho; Young Joon Moon; Doo Yong Chung; Hae Do Jung; Joo Yong Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Meta-analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared to radical cystectomy alone in improving overall survival of muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients.

Authors:  Agus Rizal A H Hamid; Fanny Riana Ridwan; Dyandra Parikesit; Fina Widia; Chaidir Arif Mochtar; Rainy Umbas
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 2.264

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.