Suzanne Delwel1,2, Erik J A Scherder2, Roberto S G M Perez3, Cees M P M Hertogh4, Andrea B Maier5,6, Frank Lobbezoo1. 1. Department of Oral Kinesiology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Clinical Neuropsychology, Faculty of Behavioral and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Elderly Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Medicine and Aged Care @AgeMelbourne, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. 6. Department of Human Movement Sciences @AgeAmsterdam, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine and compare the oral function of older people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia. METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study included participants with MCI or dementia aged 60 years or older. Global cognitive functioning was evaluated with the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the oral function was evaluated with subjective and objective assessments, including the perceived quality of chewing and swallowing, the function of the prostheses, the number of occluding pairs (OP), the degree of tooth wear and the active and passive maximum mouth opening. RESULTS: The quality of chewing and swallowing was perceived as good in, respectively, 86.0% and 90.9% of the participants. Full or partial prostheses were worn by 63.8% of the participants, and the retention was good in 58.4% of the upper and 50.0% of the lower prostheses. Participants with MCI had a median of 3.0 (Inter Quartile Range [IQR] 0.0-7.5) occluding pairs, while participants with dementia had a median of 0.0 (IQR 0.0-1.0) occluding pairs, U = 3838.50, P < 0.001. There was a weak positive correlation between the number of occluding pairs and the MMSE score, r = 0.267, also when adjusted for age, r = 0.230. The median tooth wear score was 2.0 (IQR 2.0-2.0) in participants with MCI or dementia. The active maximum mouth opening was 45.8 (SD 9.3) mm in participants with dementia, while it was 49.8 (SD 8.1) mm in those with MCI, t(253) = 2.67, P = 0.008. CONCLUSION: For most participants with MCI or dementia, the swallowing ability and chewing ability were perceived as good. In addition, more than half of the prostheses had good retention and occlusion. Participants with more severe cognitive impairment had fewer occluding pairs and a smaller active mouth opening. The degree of tooth wear was less than one-third of the clinical crown in most participants with MCI or dementia.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine and compare the oral function of older people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia. METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study included participants with MCI or dementia aged 60 years or older. Global cognitive functioning was evaluated with the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the oral function was evaluated with subjective and objective assessments, including the perceived quality of chewing and swallowing, the function of the prostheses, the number of occluding pairs (OP), the degree of tooth wear and the active and passive maximum mouth opening. RESULTS: The quality of chewing and swallowing was perceived as good in, respectively, 86.0% and 90.9% of the participants. Full or partial prostheses were worn by 63.8% of the participants, and the retention was good in 58.4% of the upper and 50.0% of the lower prostheses. Participants with MCI had a median of 3.0 (Inter Quartile Range [IQR] 0.0-7.5) occluding pairs, while participants with dementia had a median of 0.0 (IQR 0.0-1.0) occluding pairs, U = 3838.50, P < 0.001. There was a weak positive correlation between the number of occluding pairs and the MMSE score, r = 0.267, also when adjusted for age, r = 0.230. The median tooth wear score was 2.0 (IQR 2.0-2.0) in participants with MCI or dementia. The active maximum mouth opening was 45.8 (SD 9.3) mm in participants with dementia, while it was 49.8 (SD 8.1) mm in those with MCI, t(253) = 2.67, P = 0.008. CONCLUSION: For most participants with MCI or dementia, the swallowing ability and chewing ability were perceived as good. In addition, more than half of the prostheses had good retention and occlusion. Participants with more severe cognitive impairment had fewer occluding pairs and a smaller active mouth opening. The degree of tooth wear was less than one-third of the clinical crown in most participants with MCI or dementia.
Authors: Liza J M van de Rijt; Alexandra R Feast; Victoria Vickerstaff; Elizabeth L Sampson; Frank Lobbezoo Journal: Gerodontology Date: 2021-01-31 Impact factor: 2.750
Authors: Stefano Cianetti; Chiara Valenti; Massimiliano Orso; Giuseppe Lomurno; Michele Nardone; Anna Palma Lomurno; Stefano Pagano; Guido Lombardo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-24 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Dorina Lauritano; Giulia Moreo; Fedora Della Vella; Dario Di Stasio; Francesco Carinci; Alberta Lucchese; Massimo Petruzzi Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-11-18 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Kyoko Takahashi; Katsuaki Amemiya; Masahiro Nakatsuka; Kei Nakamura; Mari Kasai; Kenichi Meguro Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-10-22 Impact factor: 3.390