Literature DB >> 30125891

Improved Compliance and Comprehension of a Surgical Safety Checklist With Customized Versus Standard Training: A Randomized Trial.

David Rakoff1, Krishna Akella1, Chandrashekar Guruvegowda2, Sunil Chhajwani3, SriKrishna Seshadri4, Srikanth Sola1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the effect of customized training versus standard readily available training on surgical safety checklist (SSCL) compliance and comprehension.
BACKGROUND: The success of the SSCL in reducing surgical mortality and morbidity depends largely on the degree of compliance among health care workers with the checklist's components. We hypothesized that a customized training program would improve comprehension of the SSCL components among health care workers.
METHODS: We prospectively evaluated compliance and comprehension of a locally modified SSCL among surgeons, anesthesiologists, nurses, and perfusionists who were randomized to standard versus customized training in the department of cardiac and thoracic surgery. Standard training included videos, posters, and didactic sessions obtained from the World Health Organization. Customized training consisted of a department-specific orientation video (using local staff as actors), locally made posters, and didactic sessions. Comprehension was assessed by a written exam after each training program. Verbal and written compliance with the SSCL was measured within the operating theater by trained observers.
RESULTS: We observed a total of 244 surgeries for SSCL compliance. Comprehension of the didactic material provided in the training programs was higher in the customized versus the standard training group (75% versus 30%; P < 0.0001). Verbal compliance was higher in the customized versus standard training groups (87% versus 49%; P < 0.0001). Written compliance was 100% for both the customized and standard training groups.
CONCLUSIONS: A customized training program improves verbal compliance and comprehension among health care workers when implementing an SSCL, compared with standard readily available training.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30125891     DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Patient Saf        ISSN: 1549-8417            Impact factor:   2.844


  3 in total

1.  Checklist design and implementation: critical considerations to improve patient safety for low-frequency, high-risk patient events.

Authors:  Carman Turkelson; Megan Keiser; Gary Sculli; Diane Capoccia
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2020-04-20

2.  The Gap between Individual Perception and Compliance: A Qualitative Follow-Up Study of the Surgical Safety Checklist Application.

Authors:  Gerald Sendlhofer; David Benjamin Lumenta; Karina Leitgeb; Brigitte Kober; Lydia Jantscher; Monika Schanbacher; Andrea Berghold; Gudrun Pregartner; Gernot Brunner; Christa Tax; Lars Peter Kamolz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Reality check of using the surgical safety checklist: A qualitative study to observe application errors during snapshot audits.

Authors:  Gerald Sendlhofer; David Benjamin Lumenta; Gudrun Pregartner; Karina Leitgeb; Peter Tiefenbacher; Veronika Gombotz; Christian Richter; Lars Peter Kamolz; Gernot Brunner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.