Literature DB >> 30125680

Assessing antimicrobial stewardship initiatives: Clinical evaluation of cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam in patients with bloodstream infections secondary to AmpC-producing organisms.

Lacie McKamey1, Veena Venugopalan2, Kartikeya Cherabuddi3, Samuel Borgert4, Stacy Voils2, Kairav Shah3, Kenneth P Klinker5.   

Abstract

Management of micro-organisms harbouring AmpC β-lactamases remains challenging. Carbapenems are often considered first-line agents. Due to growing concern regarding carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, integrating non-carbapenem treatment strategies is being explored for these pathogens. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients with bacteraemia secondary to AmpC-producing organisms treated with cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP). A retrospective study of adult patients receiving cefepime or TZP for the treatment of AmpC -producing organisms with positive cefoxitin screen (i.e. Citrobacter, Enterobacter or Serratia spp. along with cefoxitin resistance) isolated from blood cultures was conducted. The primary endpoint was clinical cure at end of therapy (EOT). Secondary endpoints included microbiological eradication, frequency of susceptibility changes following treatment, and 7- and 30-day all-cause mortality. Clinical cure at EOT was 87.1%, with 93.2% of patients achieving microbiological eradication. The 7- and 30-day mortality rates were 3.8% and 10.6%, respectively. Organism susceptibility was exceptionally high, with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of ≤2 μg/mL in 90% of patients treated with cefepime (n = 108). Selection for resistance to third-generation cephalosporins or primary antimicrobial therapy was infrequent at 6.1% (8/132). In conclusion, use of cefepime or TZP for management of AmpC bloodstream infections was associated with clinical and microbiological cure with infrequent selection for resistance.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AmpC; Carbapenem-sparing; Cefepime; Piperacillin/tazobactam

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30125680     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents        ISSN: 0924-8579            Impact factor:   5.283


  3 in total

1.  Risk Factors of Death in Bloodstream Infections Caused by AmpC β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales in Patients with Neoplasia.

Authors:  Tiago da Cunha Ferreira; Ianick Souto Martins
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 2.  Is Piperacillin-Tazobactam an Appropriate Empirical Agent for Hospital-Acquired Sepsis and Community-Acquired Septic Shock of Unknown Origin in Australia?

Authors:  Alice Gage-Brown; Catherine George; Jenna Maleki; Kasha P Singh; Stephen Muhi
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-05

3.  Meropenem Versus Piperacillin-Tazobactam for Definitive Treatment of Bloodstream Infections Caused by AmpC β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacter spp, Citrobacter freundii, Morganella morganii, Providencia spp, or Serratia marcescens: A Pilot Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (MERINO-2).

Authors:  Adam G Stewart; David L Paterson; Barnaby Young; David C Lye; Joshua S Davis; Kellie Schneider; Mesut Yilmaz; Rumeysa Dinleyici; Naomi Runnegar; Andrew Henderson; Sophia Archuleta; Shirin Kalimuddin; Brian M Forde; Mark D Chatfield; Michelle J Bauer; Jeffrey Lipman; Tiffany Harris-Brown; Patrick N A Harris
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 3.835

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.