Literature DB >> 30125618

Principles for the safety evaluation of cosmetic powders.

W Steiling1, J F Almeida2, H Assaf Vandecasteele3, S Gilpin4, T Kawamoto5, L O'Keeffe6, G Pappa7, K Rettinger8, H Rothe9, A M Bowden10.   

Abstract

Consumer exposure to cosmetic (personal care) products is mostly by dermal contact, however additional considerations with regards to potential inhalation exposure from some cosmetics, such as sprays and powders, may be needed for a robust and reliable safety assessment. To get a deeper understanding of the exposure to airborne particles and droplets during product application, a team of international experts was founded under the umbrella of the European Association of the Cosmetic Industry "Cosmetics Europe" (CE) in Brussels. This expert team has worked out a pragmatic strategy how small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs), but also relevant authorities, could handle the safety evaluation of cosmetic powder products. Sufficient information on the aerodynamic diameter of sprayed droplets and here specifically of airborne particles is essential in addition to knowing the exposure after typical product application. The current article is focused on the determination of inhalation exposure to solids, and the derivation of safe exposure levels for cosmetic powder products found in the market. The principles described herein are very similar to spray products as published earlier and should be applied in a similar way (Steiling et al., 2014). Prediction models for the best estimate of inhalation exposure, developed with data from computer simulation programs, individual real-time measurements or finally by experience from the market were introduced and applied. Safety assessment approaches for exposure from powder spray products were developed and have been already considered in regulatory guidelines like the EC Cosmetics Regulation.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Airborne particles; Dust; Inhalation; Inhalation exposure; Personal care products; Safety assessment; Spray

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30125618     DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2018.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Lett        ISSN: 0378-4274            Impact factor:   4.372


  2 in total

1.  Asbestos Contamination in Talc-Based Cosmetics: An Invisible Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Tasha Stoiber; Sean Fitzgerald; Nneka S Leiba
Journal:  Environ Health Insights       Date:  2020-11-24

2.  Digital Divide in Online Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cosmetic Course From the View of the Regional Socioeconomic Distribution.

Authors:  Mengmeng Sun; Lidan Xiong; Li Li; Yu Chen; Jie Tang; Wei Hua; Yujie Mao
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-01-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.