Literature DB >> 30124308

Age differences in spatial memory for mediated environments.

Lauren L Richmond1, Jesse Q Sargent2, Shaney Flores1, Jeffrey M Zacks1.   

Abstract

Compared with younger adults, older adults have more difficulty with navigation and spatial memory in both familiar and unfamiliar domains. However, the cognitive mechanisms underlying these effects have been little explored. We examined three potential factors: (a) use of and coordination across spatial reference frames, (b) nonspatial cognitive abilities, and (c) the ability to segment a route into effective chunks. In two experiments, healthy young and older adults watched videos of navigation in a novel environment and had to remember the placement of landmarks along the route. Participants completed three spatial memory tasks-a virtual pointing task, a distance estimation task, and sketch map drawing-for each route. The pointing task depends on updating and accessing the updated egocentric reference frame relative to other frames. Map drawing may rely more on environment-centered processing. The distance estimation task could be solved using either frame of reference. Last, participants segmented each route. In a separate session, working memory, processing speed, and verbal memory were assessed. Older adults performed less well on all spatial tasks compared with younger adults; aging had a stronger negative effect on pointing performance. This may point to impairments in older adults' ability to update and coordinate information across reference frames. Performance on all spatial tasks was predicted by nonspatial task performance. Segmentation did not predict spatial memory. These results underline the importance of situating age differences in navigation in the context of basic transformations of spatial reference frames, and also in the context of nonspatial cognitive abilities. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30124308      PMCID: PMC8718108          DOI: 10.1037/pag0000286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Aging        ISSN: 0882-7974


  34 in total

1.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

Review 2.  Transformations of visuospatial images.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Zacks; Pascale Michelon
Journal:  Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev       Date:  2005-06

3.  Effects of environmental support and strategy training on older adults' use of context.

Authors:  Jessica L Paxton; Deanna M Barch; Martha Storandt; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2006-09

4.  Variations in cognitive maps: understanding individual differences in navigation.

Authors:  Steven M Weisberg; Victor R Schinazi; Nora S Newcombe; Thomas F Shipley; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 5.  Simultaneous inference in general parametric models.

Authors:  Torsten Hothorn; Frank Bretz; Peter Westfall
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.207

6.  Navigation and the mobility of older drivers.

Authors:  P C Burns
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 7.  An examination of instrumental activities of daily living assessment in older adults and mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  David A Gold
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 2.475

8.  Effects of age on navigation strategy.

Authors:  M Kirk Rodgers; Joseph A Sindone; Scott D Moffat
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 4.673

9.  Simultaneous spatial updating in nested environments.

Authors:  Ranxiao Frances Wang; James R Brockmole
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

Review 10.  Egocentric and allocentric spatial reference frames in aging: A systematic review.

Authors:  Desirée Colombo; Silvia Serino; Cosimo Tuena; Elisa Pedroli; Antonios Dakanalis; Pietro Cipresso; Giuseppe Riva
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.