| Literature DB >> 30123998 |
Shahnaz Razavi1, Farnaz Khadivi2,3, Fatemeh Hashemi2, Abbas Bakhtiari2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The incidence rate of testicular cancer among young males is high. Co-administration of bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin (BEP) has increased survival rate of patients with testicular cancer. Although BEP is one of the most effective treatment for testicular cancer, but it severely affects the reproductive system that ultimately leads to infertility. In addition to its antioxidant activity, zinc has an important role in progression of spermiogenesis. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of zinc on sperm parameters, chromatin condensation and testicular structure after BEP treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Chemotherapy; Chromatin; Seminiferous Tubules; Spermatozoa; Zinc
Year: 2018 PMID: 30123998 PMCID: PMC6099135 DOI: 10.22074/cellj.2019.5522
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell J ISSN: 2228-5806 Impact factor: 2.479
Fig.1Comparative analysis the mean percentages of sperm with excessive histone (aniline blue positive sperm) in different groups.***; P<0.001 and *; P<0.05 show significant differences as compared to control group.
Fig.2Photograph of aniline blue staining; sperm with excessive histone were dark blue stained (Left arrow), while sperm with correct histone-protamine replacement were light blue stained (right arrow).
Fig.3Comparative analysis of the mean thickness of seminiferous tubules basement membrane in rats of different groups. ***; P<0.001 and **; P<0.01 show significant differences as compared to control group.
Fig.4Photograph of rats testicular tissue stained with Periodic AcidSchiff (PAS), A. Control, B. BEP, C. BEP+ zinc, and D. Zinc group (scale bars: 200 µm).
Fig.5Comparison of the mean number of cells. A. Comparison of the mean number of spermatogonia per seminiferous tubule and B. Leydig cells per field in different groups. ***; P<0.001 shows significant differences as compared to control group.
Comparison the mean percentages of sperm parameters in different experimental groups (control, BEP, BEP+ zinc and zinc)
| Group | Control | BEP | BEP+ zinc | Zinc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sperm parameters | Mean ± SE | Mean ± SE | Mean ± SE | Mean ± SE |
| Concentration (×106) | 58.50 ± 1.88b | 33.03 ± 1.25 | 50.35 ± 1.41a, b | 60.90 ± 1.76b |
| Motility (%) | 73.73 ± 1.89b | 36.48 ± 1.63 | 65.06 ± 2.33a, b | 75.53 ± 2.11b |
| Abnormal morphology (%) | 21.93 ± 1.33b | 37.07 ± 1.48 | 28.26 ± 1.49a, b | 20.40 ± 1.53b |
a; Significant differences as compared to control group (P<0.05) and b; Significant differences as compared to BEP group (P<0.001).