Literature DB >> 30123213

Lactic Acid Bacteria for Delivery of Endogenous or Engineered Therapeutic Molecules.

Peter A Bron1,2, Michiel Kleerebezem2,3.   

Abstract

Food-grade lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are considered suitable vehicles for the production and/or delivery of health promoting or therapeutic, bioactive molecules. The molecules considered for health-beneficial use include the endogenous effector molecules produced by probiotics (mostly lactobacilli), as well as heterologous bioactives that can be produced in LAB by genetic engineering (mostly using lactococci). Both strategies aim to deliver appropriate dosages of specific bioactive molecules to the site of action. This review uses specific examples of both strategies to illustrate the different avenues of research involved in these applications as well as their translation to human health-promoting applications. These examples pinpoint that despite the promising perspectives of these approaches, the evidence for their effective applications in human populations is lagging behind.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lactobacillus; Lactococcus lactis; genetic engineering; lactic acid bacteria; probiotics; therapeutic molecules

Year:  2018        PMID: 30123213      PMCID: PMC6085456          DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Microbiol        ISSN: 1664-302X            Impact factor:   5.640


Lab for Food-Grade Bioactive Delivery

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) have a long history of safe consumption in the form of fermented food products and as a consequence are considered food-grade. LAB encompass various bacterial genera, including Lactococcus, Streptococcus, Lactobacillus, Leuconostoc, and Pediococcus. The safety status of these bacteria has inspired their use for the production and delivery of bioactive molecules that intend to improve consumers’ health. An important concept in this domain is the use of probiotics that are live microorganisms that when administered in adequate amounts confer a health benefit on the host (Hill et al., 2014), a domain dominated by species of the Lactobacillus genus. An alternative approach employs LAB for the engineered production and/or delivery of heterologous bioactive molecules, which mostly employs Lactococcus lactis as a production host, because of its extensive genetic toolbox. Both conceptual approaches are illustrated in this review through specific examples that in our opinion are closest to actual application as health promoting concepts. This highlights the impressive potential of using these bacteria for bioactive delivery, but also exemplifies the complexity of translation toward predictable effects in human applications.

The Probiotic Lactobacilli

Lactobacillus species encompass a group of LAB that are encountered in a diverse range of nutrition-rich environments, including the human and animal gastrointestinal tract, plants, as well as food and feed (Duar et al., 2017). Specific Lactobacillus strains are marketed as probiotics. An intrinsic characteristic of these probiotics lactobacilli is that they produce and deliver (specific) health promoting effector molecules in situ that modulate host physiology in a health-promoting direction. For many probiotic lactobacilli the molecular mechanism by which they impact host health remains largely unknown. However, in depth molecular research on specific probiotic strains has generated an impressive knowledgebase of the effector molecules of these strains that play a role in the modulation of specific host pathways. Many of the probiotic effector molecules that have been described appear to reside in the bacterial cell-envelope (Bron et al., 2011, 2013; Lebeer et al., 2018). Since the research related to probiotic effector molecule discovery has recently been reviewed, we do not expand this section beyond the exemplary case discussed below. The chosen example is in our opinion among the best-described in this field, and includes technological improvements by encapsulation for in situ delivery of the probiotic bacteria and/or their effector molecules (Li et al., 2016). The major secreted proteins P40 and P75 produced by the extensively studied probiotic strain Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG were demonstrated to modulate epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R) activity in epithelial cells, thereby modulating Akt activation. This interaction was shown to inhibit cytokine-induced apoptosis in epithelial cells in vitro, and to promote epithelial cell growth ex vivo in human and mouse colon-tissue explants (Yan et al., 2011; Yan and Polk, 2012). Importantly, EGF-R modulation by P40 protected mice against chemically induced colitis (Yan et al., 2011; Yan and Polk, 2012). Notably, homologues of these two secreted proteins are present in other L. rhamnosus strains as well as in the related species Lactobacillus casei, implying that the effects reported for L. rhamnosus GG could potentially also be achieved with related strains (Bauerl et al., 2010). The same effector molecules probably underlie the observation that L. rhamnosus GG is able to stimulate epithelial wound healing in in vitro scratch assays using both skin- and gingival- human epithelial-cell lines (Mohammedsaeed et al., 2015; Fernandez-Gutierrez et al., 2017). Interestingly, in vivo transcriptome responses in human duodenal tissues following L. rhamnosus GG consumption revealed significant modulation of epithelial wound healing pathways in the human intestinal mucosa (van Baarlen et al., 2011), indicating the congruency of these molecular interactions in different model systems. However, the connection of these conserved responses to reliable health benefits in human populations remains highly challenging. This may be due to the extensive degree of human individuality and the corresponding individualized physiological relevance of such cellular modulations, which could predominantly depend on the baseline molecular state of an individual. This conceptual view was previously coined as the “band-width of health” and may represent a principal hurdle in the reliable application of probiotics and/or their effector molecules in human (Bron et al., 2011; van Baarlen et al., 2011; Klaenhammer et al., 2012).

Engineered Lactococci

For specific diseases it is well established which human proteins are underrepresented in the diseased population and/or have an established role in therapy. LAB engineered to produce such heterologous bioactive and/or therapeutic molecules provide an approach to delivering such molecules in situ as live bacterial therapeutics, or may serve as a production host to obtain these molecules in purified form. General genetic engineering capacities and in particular the controlled gene expression toolboxes available for the lactobacilli are lagging behind those that have been developed for the paradigm LAB L. lactis (Kok et al., 2017). As a consequence, the majority of these engineering approaches for the production (and delivery) have employed L. lactis as a production host. A lot of effort has been invested in the production and delivery of vaccine-antigens and allergens by engineered lactococci, and since this area has recently been reviewed (Wyszynska et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2016; Szatraj et al., 2017) we focus on some specific examples of alternative categories of bioactive molecules, including bacterial enzymes and human factors known to modulate mucosal physiology and/or immune function. The examples presented were chosen on basis of available scale-up and commercialization strategies and employ L. lactis as a production host.

Lactococcal Production of an Antimicrobial Enzyme

Staphylococcus simulans harbors lss which encodes a 25 kDa antibacterial protein termed lysostaphin that hydrolyzes the GlyGly bond present in the cell wall of Staphylococcus aureus, thereby lysing this important pathogen (Thumm and Gotz, 1997). Lysostaphin administration in a nasal spray effectively reduces S. aureus carriage, supporting the prevention of spreading of this bacterium in hospital environments (Quickel et al., 1971). Biosynexus Inc. is involved in development of protein-based pharmaceutical products aiming to ameliorate staphylococcal infections in infants, including lysostaphin. To provide a suitable production system for this selective antimicrobial enzyme, the encoding lss gene was cloned under control of the P promoter and introduced in the expression host-strain NZ3900, allowing food-grade, lactose-based plasmid selection and induction of lysostaphin production through the NICE system (Mierau and Kleerebezem, 2005; Mierau et al., 2005). Following optimization of lysostaphin production at 1 L scale it was shown to be readily scalable to 300 and 3000 L production facilities. In addition, the protein could be purified from the lactococcal culture supernatant via straightforward and industrially scalable chromatography procedures (Mierau et al., 2005). This example illustrates that L. lactis is a suitable host for the production and purification of relevant bioactive enzymes, in this case an anti-Staphylococcus agent. Purification of the compound of interest. avoids the consequences of releasing genetically modified L. lactis strains and is suitable for bioactive molecules that do not depend on the presence or co-modulatory effects of the production host in the application.

Live-Biotherapeutics Using Engineered L. lactis

Intrexon develops so-called Actobiotics, a class of orally delivered biopharmaceuticals employing engineered and biologically contained L. lactis production hosts for the in situ production and delivery of various proteins and peptides in the oral and gastrointestinal tract of humans. The selection of the bioactives to be produced within this delivery system aim to provide therapies against oral, gastrointestinal, metabolic, allergic, and autoimmune diseases, focusing on bioactives with known pharmacological activity and that are supported by documented efficacy and safety information. The company’s ambition is strongly based on the landmark study that demonstrated that chemically induced colitis in mice could be effectively treated with L. lactis strains that produce interleukin-10 (IL-10) (Steidler et al., 2000). Later work illustrated that the L. lactis based intestinal IL-10 delivery could also contribute to reduction of food-induced anaphylaxis in mice models, which may support the prevention of IgE-type sensitization to common food allergens (Frossard et al., 2007). Likewise, IL-10 delivery combined with secretion of the type-1 diabetes (T1D) auto-antigen GAD65370-575 by the same L. lactis strain was effective in suppressing T1D in a preclinical NOD-mouse model (Robert and Steidler, 2014; Robert et al., 2014). Besides these IL-10 producing L. lactis strains and their derivatives, the same platform for production and delivery of bioactives is employed for a variety of other molecules intending to provide live lactococcal therapeutics for a range of human and animal diseases (Vandenbroucke et al., 2004; McLean et al., 2017). Moreover, some comparative work using similar IL-10 producing Lactobacillus strains has been reported and may expand or enhance the application potential of these concepts (Steidler, 2003). Besides the bioactive production and delivery technology, the Actobiotics platform is supported by effective strategies for the biological containment of genetically engineered bacteria as well as scalable production and processing procedures for the live biotherapeutic bacteria (Steidler, 2003). However, initial human trials in patients suffering from inflammatory bowel disease established the safety and biological containment of the IL-10 producing lactococcal delivery vehicle (Braat et al., 2006), but failed to deliver convincing clinical efficacy evidence for disease symptom reduction to date, illustrating that translation of the mouse-model outcomes to human applications still requires further investigation. Aurealis Pharma is a pharmaceutical company that employs genetically modified L. lactis strains for the delivery of combinations of therapeutic proteins to diseased tissues. For example, L. lactis MG1363 was engineered to allow plasmid-based expression of three genes encoding human fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF-2), interleukin 4 (IL-4), and colony stimulating growth factor 1 (CSF-1) that were selected based on their functional properties (Yun et al., 2010; Hume and MacDonald, 2012; Sica and Mantovani, 2012) and availability of clinical safety data. An animal study demonstrated the efficacy of the combination therapy provided by the three proteins and the L. lactis strain in a delayed wound healing model in diabetic mice[1]. Aurealis Pharma is currently producing a clinical grade product for a clinical phase 1 trial to build a safety dossier for the use of this live bacterial therapeutic in diabetic foot ulcer patients.

Perspectives

This short review illustrates that significant advances have been made in understanding the mechanism of action of endogenous probiotic Lactobacillus effector molecules, and that heterologous production of therapeutic bioactives in engineered lactococci has reached technological maturity. The examples chosen employed in this review are actively pursued by commercial initiatives and involve either purified bioactives or the use of the engineered LAB as live biotherapeutic. However, in both strategies, the translation of the health-beneficial effects toward reliable human application is lagging behind despite the consistent findings across the different layers of the translational pipeline progressing from molecular insight in molecular interactions involved toward their conservation in in situ human response. Lagging efficacy evidence may be largely due to human individuality in health and disease, which implies that careful consideration should be given to selecting the appropriate target population. This may require novel strategies toward subject stratification and responsiveness prediction to better select and treat human subjects that are likely to have a perceivable benefit from the response elicited by the bioactive supplied.

Author Contributions

Both authors conceived the review, wrote it together and decided to submit it to this Research Topic.

Conflict of Interest Statement

PB was employed by the company NIZO Food Research BV. Part of the work by PB and MK was funded by the BE-Basic Program. Neither employer, nor funding agency had a role in the preparation of the manuscript.
  32 in total

Review 1.  Macrophage plasticity and polarization: in vivo veritas.

Authors:  Antonio Sica; Alberto Mantovani
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 2.  The impact of probiotics and prebiotics on the immune system.

Authors:  Todd R Klaenhammer; Michiel Kleerebezem; Matthias Volkmar Kopp; Maria Rescigno
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 53.106

3.  Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic.

Authors:  Colin Hill; Francisco Guarner; Gregor Reid; Glenn R Gibson; Daniel J Merenstein; Bruno Pot; Lorenzo Morelli; Roberto Berni Canani; Harry J Flint; Seppo Salminen; Philip C Calder; Mary Ellen Sanders
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 4.  The Evolution of gene regulation research in Lactococcus lactis.

Authors:  Jan Kok; Lieke A van Gijtenbeek; Anne de Jong; Sjoerd B van der Meulen; Ana Solopova; Oscar P Kuipers
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 16.408

5.  Colon-specific delivery of a probiotic-derived soluble protein ameliorates intestinal inflammation in mice through an EGFR-dependent mechanism.

Authors:  Fang Yan; Hanwei Cao; Timothy L Cover; M Kay Washington; Yan Shi; LinShu Liu; Rupesh Chaturvedi; Richard M Peek; Keith T Wilson; D Brent Polk
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Oral delivery of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD)-65 and IL10 by Lactococcus lactis reverses diabetes in recent-onset NOD mice.

Authors:  Sofie Robert; Conny Gysemans; Tatiana Takiishi; Hannelie Korf; Isabella Spagnuolo; Guido Sebastiani; Karolien Van Huynegem; Lothar Steidler; Silvia Caluwaerts; Pieter Demetter; Clive H Wasserfall; Mark A Atkinson; Francesco Dotta; Pieter Rottiers; Tom L Van Belle; Chantal Mathieu
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 9.461

7.  Oral administration of an IL-10-secreting Lactococcus lactis strain prevents food-induced IgE sensitization.

Authors:  Christophe P Frossard; Lothar Steidler; Philippe A Eigenmann
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 10.793

8.  Interleukin-27 Is a Potential Rescue Therapy for Acute Severe Colitis Through Interleukin-10-Dependent, T-Cell-Independent Attenuation of Colonic Mucosal Innate Immune Responses.

Authors:  Mairi H McLean; Caroline Andrews; Miranda L Hanson; Walter A Baseler; Miriam R Anver; Emilee Senkevitch; Aleksandra K Staniszewska; Christopher Smith; Luke C Davies; Julie Hixon; Wenqeng Li; Wei Shen; Lothar Steidler; Scott K Durum
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 5.325

9.  Fibroblast growth factors: biology, function, and application for tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Ye-Rang Yun; Jong Eun Won; Eunyi Jeon; Sujin Lee; Wonmo Kang; Hyejin Jo; Jun-Hyeog Jang; Ueon Sang Shin; Hae-Won Kim
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2010-11-07       Impact factor: 7.813

Review 10.  Lactic acid bacteria - promising vaccine vectors: possibilities, limitations, doubts.

Authors:  K Szatraj; A K Szczepankowska; M Chmielewska-Jeznach
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 3.772

View more
  15 in total

1.  Angiotensin (1-7) delivered orally via probiotic, but not subcutaneously, benefits the gut-brain axis in older rats.

Authors:  Thomas W Buford; Yi Sun; Lisa M Roberts; Anisha Banerjee; Sujitha Peramsetty; Anthony Knighton; Amrisha Verma; Drake Morgan; Gonzalo E Torres; Qiuhong Li; Christy S Carter
Journal:  Geroscience       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 7.713

2.  Enterococcus peptidoglycan remodeling promotes checkpoint inhibitor cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Matthew E Griffin; Juliel Espinosa; Jessica L Becker; Ji-Dung Luo; Thomas S Carroll; Jyoti K Jha; Gary R Fanger; Howard C Hang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 63.714

Review 3.  Future of Probiotics and Prebiotics and the Implications for Early Career Researchers.

Authors:  Irina Spacova; Hemraj B Dodiya; Anna-Ursula Happel; Conall Strain; Dieter Vandenheuvel; Xuedan Wang; Gregor Reid
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 4.  Genome editing of lactic acid bacteria: opportunities for food, feed, pharma and biotech.

Authors:  Rosa A Börner; Vijayalakshmi Kandasamy; Amalie M Axelsen; Alex T Nielsen; Elleke F Bosma
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 2.742

5.  Targeted Drug Delivery in Lipid-like Nanocages and Extracellular Vesicles.

Authors:  A V Sokolov; N N Kostin; L A Ovchinnikova; Y A Lomakin; A A Kudriaeva
Journal:  Acta Naturae       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.845

6.  Novel biotechnological approaches for monitoring and immunization against resistant to antibiotics Escherichia coli and other pathogenic bacteria.

Authors:  José E Belizário; Marcelo P Sircili
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  Anchoring of heterologous proteins in multiple Lactobacillus species using anchors derived from Lactobacillus plantarum.

Authors:  Geir Mathiesen; Lise Øverland; Katarzyna Kuczkowska; Vincent G H Eijsink
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Exploiting Prophage-Mediated Lysis for Biotherapeutic Release by Lactobacillus reuteri.

Authors:  Laura M Alexander; Jee-Hwan Oh; Donald S Stapleton; Kathryn L Schueler; Mark P Keller; Alan D Attie; Jan-Peter van Pijkeren
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 9.  Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2: SARS-CoV-2 Receptor and Regulator of the Renin-Angiotensin System: Celebrating the 20th Anniversary of the Discovery of ACE2.

Authors:  Mahmoud Gheblawi; Kaiming Wang; Anissa Viveiros; Quynh Nguyen; Jiu-Chang Zhong; Anthony J Turner; Mohan K Raizada; Maria B Grant; Gavin Y Oudit
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 10.  Safety Aspects of Genetically Modified Lactic Acid Bacteria.

Authors:  Tina Vida Plavec; Aleš Berlec
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-02-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.