Literature DB >> 30122216

Replacing Sedentary Time: Meta-analysis of Objective-Assessment Studies.

Jesús Del Pozo-Cruz1, Antonio García-Hermoso2, Rosa M Alfonso-Rosa3, Francisco Alvarez-Barbosa4, Neville Owen5, Sebastien Chastin6, Borja Del Pozo-Cruz7.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The aim was to summarize estimates of the potential benefits for cardiometabolic risk markers and all-cause mortality of replacing time spent in sedentary behaviors with light-intensity physical activity or with moderate to vigorous physical activity, from studies using device-based measurement. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Four databases covering the period up to December 2016 were searched and analyzed (February 2017). Data were extracted by two independent reviewers. For the meta-analyses, the estimated regression coefficients (β) and 95% CIs were analyzed for BMI, waist circumference, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Pooled relative rate and 95% CIs were calculated for fasting glucose, fasting insulin, and homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance values. Hazard ratios were extracted from studies of all-cause mortality risk. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Ten studies (with 17,390 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Reallocation of 30 minutes of sedentary time to light-intensity physical activity was associated with reductions in waist circumference, fasting insulin, and all-cause mortality risk; and with an increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Reallocating 30 minutes of sedentary time to moderate to vigorous physical activity was associated with reductions in BMI, waist circumference, fasting glucose, fasting insulin, and all-cause mortality (not pooled) and with an increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
CONCLUSIONS: Replacing sedentary time with either light-intensity physical activity or moderate to vigorous physical activity may be beneficial, but when sedentary time is replaced with moderate to vigorous physical activity, the predicted impacts are stronger and apparent for a broader range of risk markers. These findings point to potential benefits of replacing sedentary time with light-intensity physical activity, which may benefit those less able to tolerate or accommodate higher-intensity activities, including many older adults.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30122216     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  27 in total

Review 1.  Sit less and move more for cardiovascular health: emerging insights and opportunities.

Authors:  David W Dunstan; Shilpa Dogra; Sophie E Carter; Neville Owen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Breast cancer survivors reduce accelerometer-measured sedentary time in an exercise intervention.

Authors:  Lauren S Weiner; Michelle Takemoto; Suneeta Godbole; Sandahl H Nelson; Loki Natarajan; Dorothy D Sears; Sheri J Hartman
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 3.  Is Sedentary Behavior a Novel Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Disease?

Authors:  Andrea T Duran; Emily Romero; Keith M Diaz
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Where Does the Time Go? Displacement of Device-Measured Sedentary Time in Effective Sedentary Behaviour Interventions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Víctor Segura-Jiménez; Stuart J H Biddle; Katrien De Cocker; Shahjahan Khan; Blanca Gavilán-Carrera
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 11.928

5.  Physical behaviors and their association with type 2 diabetes mellitus risk markers in urban South African middle-aged adults: an isotemporal substitutionapproach.

Authors:  Clement N Kufe; Julia H Goedecke; Maphoko Masemola; Tinashe Chikowore; Melikhaya Soboyisi; Antonia Smith; Kate Westgate; Soren Brage; Lisa K Micklesfield
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2022-07

6.  The Effectiveness of Sedentary Behaviour Reduction Workplace Interventions on Cardiometabolic Risk Markers: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marsha L Brierley; Angel M Chater; Lindsey R Smith; Daniel P Bailey
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Does chronic pain hinder physical activity among older adults with type 2 diabetes?

Authors:  Nanna Wackström; Anne M Koponen; Sakari Suominen; Ina M Tarkka; Nina Simonsen
Journal:  Health Psychol Behav Med       Date:  2020-08-25

Review 8.  Behavioral Medicine for Sedentary Behavior, Daily Physical Activity, and Exercise to Prevent Cardiovascular Disease: A Review.

Authors:  Mary Hannan; Emily Kringle; Cheuh-Lung Hwang; Deepika Laddu
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 5.113

9.  Comparisons in Screen-Time Behaviours among Adolescents with and without Long-Term Illnesses or Disabilities: Results from 2013/14 HBSC Study.

Authors:  Kwok W Ng; Lilly Augustine; Jo Inchley
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  The effect of physical activity on total homocysteine concentrations and cardiovascular risk in older Brazilian adults with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  José Jonas de Oliveira; Alexandre de Souza E Silva; Anna Gabriela Silva Vilela Ribeiro; Carolina Gabriela Reis Barbosa; Jasiele Aparecida de Oliveira Silva; Annie Guimarães Pontes; João Paulo Estevam Batista; Adriana Pertille
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2021-02-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.