Literature DB >> 30122138

Stent Protrusion >20 mm Into the Aorta: A New Predictor for Restenosis After Kissing Stent Reconstruction of the Aortoiliac Bifurcation.

Miklós Vértes1, Ildikó Zsófia Juhász1, Tin Dat Nguyen2, Dániel Sándor Veres3, Artúr Hüttl1, Balázs Nemes1, Kálmán Hüttl1, Edit Dósa1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the long-term patency of aortoiliac kissing stents and to identify predisposing factors for the development of in-stent restenosis (ISR).
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 105 patients (median age 60.9 years; 64 women) with symptomatic aortoiliac occlusive disease who had kissing stents implanted between 2001 and 2015. The indication for kissing stents was severe claudication in 91 (86.7%) patients and critical limb ischemia in 14 (13.3%). Lesions were TASC A in 52 (49.5%), B in 29 (27.6%), C in 4 (3.8%), and D in 20 (19%) patients. Twenty-five (23.8%) patients had heavily calcified lesions. In all, 210 stents were deployed [180 (85.7%) self-expanding and 30 (14.3%) balloon-expandable]. Follow-up included clinical evaluation, ankle-brachial index measurement, and duplex ultrasonography.
RESULTS: The median follow-up was 45 months. The primary patency rates were 93%, 86%, and 77% at 12, 24, and 60 months, respectively. Significant ISR developed in 23 (21.9%) patients (12 unilateral and 11 bilateral). Univariate Cox regression analysis revealed older age [hazard ratio (HR) 0.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31 to 0.81, p=0.004] and larger aortic diameter (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.7, p<0.001) to be variables favoring long-term patency, while a longer aortic stent segment (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.09, p=0.003) and a larger discrepancy between the summed stent diameters and the aortic diameter (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.65, p=0.043) were associated with ISR development. Multivariate analysis showed a longer aortic stent segment to be the only significant determinant of ISR (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.01, p=0.035).
CONCLUSION: The kissing stent technique can be performed with good long-term patency. Patients whose iliac stents protrude too far into the aorta need closer follow-up.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic stent length; aortoiliac bifurcation; in-stent restenosis; kissing stents; occlusion; stenosis; surveillance

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30122138     DOI: 10.1177/1526602818794959

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1526-6028            Impact factor:   3.487


  5 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of Individual Patient Data After Kissing Stent Treatment for Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease.

Authors:  Erik Groot Jebbink; Suzanne Holewijn; Michel Versluis; Frederike Grimme; Jan Willem Hinnen; Sebastian Sixt; John F Angle; Walter Dorigo; Michel M P J Reijnen
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 3.487

2.  Midterm results of kissing stent reconstruction of the aortoiliac bifurcation.

Authors:  Deniz Serefli; Onur Saydam; A Yaprak Engin; Mehmet Atay
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 1.859

Review 3.  Diabetes and restenosis.

Authors:  Scott Wilson; Pasquale Mone; Urna Kansakar; Stanislovas S Jankauskas; Kwame Donkor; Ayobami Adebayo; Fahimeh Varzideh; Michael Eacobacci; Jessica Gambardella; Angela Lombardi; Gaetano Santulli
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 9.951

4.  Fate of Asymptomatic Limb after Kissing Stents in Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease.

Authors:  Faheem Asem Ahmad; Martin Michael Hennessy; Alexander Fredrik Nath
Journal:  Vasc Specialist Int       Date:  2022-03-31

Review 5.  [General Treatment Strategy for Intervention in Lower Extremity Arterial Disease].

Authors:  Je Hwan Won
Journal:  Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi       Date:  2021-05-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.