Literature DB >> 30122084

Healthcare resource utilization and costs in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.

May Hagiwara1, Arati Sharma1, Karen C Chung2, Thomas E Delea1.   

Abstract

AIM: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with high disease burden. This analysis estimated HRU and costs among newly diagnosed AML patients in a US commercially insured population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study using the IMS Health PharMetrics Plus and Hospital Charge Detail Master databases. Patients included adults who were newly diagnosed with AML between January 2007 and June 2016 ("study period"). Patients with <12 months of continuous enrollment prior to the index date were excluded, as were those whose first diagnosis was AML in remission/relapse, those diagnosed with acute promyelocytic leukemia, those on Medicare supplemental insurance, or those with a diagnosis of AML in remission/relapse without evidence of treatment during the study period. Patients were stratified by receipt of AML treatment (chemotherapy/hematopoietic cell transplantation [HCT]), and their follow-up was partitioned into initial, remission, and relapsed health states. Mean HRU and costs were tallied by treatment and, for treated patients, by health state and time since entry into health state (≤6 vs >6 months).
RESULTS: A total of 9,455 patients met study criteria, including 6,415 (68%) treated and 3,040 (32%) untreated patients, with mean follow-up of 18.3 and 16.4 months, respectively. Mean age was 55 years in treated patients and 60 years in untreated patients. Mean total costs per patient were $386,077 in treated patients and $79,382 in untreated patients. For treated patients, 60% of total costs ($231,867 per patient) were incurred during the initial health state, representing time without remission/relapse. Mean monthly total healthcare costs were $21,055 and $4,854 among treated and untreated patients, respectively. LIMITATIONS AND
CONCLUSIONS: HRU and costs of managing AML patients are substantial. In treated patients, the majority of costs were incurred during the initial treatment period, without claims indicating remission/relapse.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AML; I00; I13; costs; healthcare resource utilization; newly diagnosed

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30122084     DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1513847

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Econ        ISSN: 1369-6998            Impact factor:   2.448


  10 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of azacitidine and venetoclax in unfit patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Kishan K Patel; Amer M Zeidan; Rory M Shallis; Thomas Prebet; Nikolai Podoltsev; Scott F Huntington
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-02-23

2.  Socioeconomic cost of AML in Sweden-A population-based study using multiple nation-wide registers.

Authors:  Emma Hernlund; Josefine Redig; Björn Paulsson; Åsa Rangert Derolf; Martin Höglund; Simona Vertuani; Gunnar Juliusson
Journal:  EJHaem       Date:  2021-05-06

Review 3.  Daunorubicin/Cytarabine Liposome: A Review in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia.

Authors:  Hannah A Blair
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Patterns of undertreatment among patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML): considerations for patients eligible for non-intensive chemotherapy (NIC).

Authors:  Elizabeth Hubscher; Slaven Sikirica; Timothy Bell; Andrew Brown; Verna Welch; Alexander Russell-Smith; Paul D'Amico
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Healthcare Resource Utilization among Patients between 60-75 Years with Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia Receiving Intensive Chemotherapy Induction: A Spanish Retrospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Antonio Solana-Altabella; Juan Eduardo Megías-Vericat; Octavio Ballesta-López; Blanca Boluda; Isabel Cano; Evelyn Acuña-Cruz; Rebeca Rodríguez-Veiga; Laura Torres-Miñana; Claudia Sargas; Miguel Á Sanz; Carmela Borrell-García; Eduardo López-Briz; José Luis Poveda-Andrés; Javier De la Rubia; Pau Montesinos; David Martínez-Cuadrón
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Healthcare resource utilization trends in patients with acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy receiving first-line systemic treatment or best supportive care: A multicenter international study.

Authors:  Tomoki Ito; David Sanford; Ciprian Tomuleasa; Hui-Hua Hsiao; Leonardo José Enciso Olivera; Anoop Kumar Enjeti; Alberto Gimenez Conca; Teresa Bernal Del Castillo; Larisa Girshova; Maria Paola Martelli; Birol Guvenc; Cat N Bui; Alex Delgado; Yinghui Duan; Belen Garbayo Guijarro; Cynthia Llamas; Je-Hwan Lee
Journal:  Eur J Haematol       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.674

Review 7.  Access to Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia in the Developing World: Barriers and Solutions.

Authors:  Luis Antonio Meillon-Garcia; Roberta Demichelis-Gómez
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 5.075

8.  The epidemiology, treatment patterns, healthcare utilizations and costs of Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML) in Taiwan.

Authors:  Huai-Hsuan Huang; Chieh-Min Chen; Chen-Yu Wang; William Wei-Yuan Hsu; Ho-Min Chen; Bor-Sheng Ko; Fei-Yuan Hsiao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Challenges Faced by Mothers Caring for Children with Leukaemia During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Maha Atout; Fatimah S Tarawneh; Amani Al-Kharabsheh
Journal:  J Pediatr Nurs       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 2.145

10.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of oral azacitidine maintenance therapy in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Jan Philipp Bewersdorf; Kishan K Patel; Scott F Huntington; Amer M Zeidan
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-11-23
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.