Literature DB >> 30121371

Breast cancers with a HER2/CEP17 ratio of 2.0 or greater and an average HER2 copy number of less than 4.0 per cell: frequency, immunohistochemical correlation, and clinicopathological features.

Somaye Y Zare1, Leo Lin1, Abrar G Alghamdi1, Svenja Daehne1, Andres A Roma1, Farnaz Hasteh1, Marie Dell'Aquila1, Oluwole Fadare2.   

Abstract

The 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guidelines classified breast cancers with a fluorescence in situ hybridization dual-probe HER2/CEP17 ratio of 2 or greater as "amplified," inclusive of cases with a HER2 copy number less than 4. The 2018 ASCO/CAP update assigns HER2/neu status for the latter group in a fashion that is highly dependent on the associated immunohistochemical findings. Herein, the authors define the frequency, immunohistochemical correlates, and other clinicopathological features of breast cancers with HER2/CEP17 ratio of 2 or greater and HER2/neu copy number less than 4 (group A), based on an analysis of an institutional cohort assessed for HER2/neu status by both florescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry and scored using 2013 ASCO/CAP criteria. Group A cases were compared with a group B of HER2/neu-amplified breast cancers with a HER2/neu copy number of 4 or greater regarding a variety of clinicopathological features. One hundred sixty-nine (14%) of 1201 cases were HER2/neu amplified, 18 (10.7%) in group A and 151 (89.3%) in group B. By immunohistochemistry, 61.1% of group A cases were HER2/neu negative, 7 (38.9%) were equivocal, and none were positive. In contrast, 66.9% of group B cases were HER2 positive (3+). We could not demonstrate statistically significant differences between the 2 groups regarding standard clinicopathological variables. In summary, our group A cases account for 1.5% of breast cancers, and 10.7% of all HER2/neu-amplified cancers classified as such based on 2013 ASCO/CAP criteria. They are predominantly HER2/neu negative by immunohistochemistry, which suggests that they are biologically different from classically HER2/neu-amplified cases and which validates the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline against automatically classifying such cases as HER2/neu amplified.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Centromere enumeration probe for chromosome 17; Chromosome 17 monosomy; Fluorescence in situ hybridization; Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30121371     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2018.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  3 in total

Review 1.  Applying the New Guidelines of HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Huina Zhang; Ioana Moisini; Rana M Ajabnoor; Bradley M Turner; David G Hicks
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Impact of the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization interpretation in invasive breast cancers with immunohistochemically equivocal results.

Authors:  Bo Wang; Wei Ding; Ke Sun; Xiaoling Wang; Liming Xu; Xiaodong Teng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  A Validation Study of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry Digital Imaging Analysis and its Correlation with Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Fluorescence In situ Hybridization Results in Breast Carcinoma.

Authors:  Ramon Hartage; Aidan C Li; Scott Hammond; Anil V Parwani
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2020-02-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.