Literature DB >> 30121287

Physiological linkage to an interaction partner is negatively associated with stability in sympathetic nervous system responding.

Katherine R Thorson1, Tessa V West2.   

Abstract

Recent work has demonstrated that people can be influenced by the physiological states of their interaction partners, showing physiological linkage to them from one moment to the next. In a study of unacquainted dyads who interacted for 30 min (ndyads = 47), we examine the novel question: Are people who show physiological linkage to their partners in sympathetic nervous system responding also less stable in their own responses? Understanding this relationship has important implications for how social relationships impact affective functioning and health. Results using multilevel modeling demonstrated that the within-person correlation between linkage and stability was negative-the more dyad members were physiologically influenced by their interaction partners, the less stable they were in their own physiological responding. This work shows that physiological linkage can come at a cost to people's own stability, meaning our physiological states are more vulnerable to social influence than previously thought.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dyadic interaction; Physiological linkage; Physiological stability; Social psychophysiology; Within-person variability

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30121287     DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  4 in total

1.  Dataset of parent-child hyperscanning functional near-infrared spectroscopy recordings.

Authors:  Andrea Bizzego; Giulio Gabrieli; Atiqah Azhari; Mengyu Lim; Gianluca Esposito
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 8.501

2.  Physical presence of spouse enhances brain-to-brain synchrony in co-parenting couples.

Authors:  Atiqah Azhari; Mengyu Lim; Andrea Bizzego; Giulio Gabrieli; Marc H Bornstein; Gianluca Esposito
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Being 'in sync'-is interactional synchrony the key to understanding the social brain?

Authors:  Annett Schirmer; Merle Fairhurst; Stefanie Hoehl
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Influence of stress on physiological synchrony in a stressful versus non-stressful group setting.

Authors:  Bernadette Denk; Stephanie J Dimitroff; Maria Meier; Annika B E Benz; Ulrike U Bentele; Eva Unternaehrer; Nathalie F Popovic; Wolfgang Gaissmaier; Jens C Pruessner
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 3.575

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.