Literature DB >> 30120967

Concordance of somatic mutation profiles (BRAF,NRAS, and TERT) and tumoral PD-L1 in matched primary cutaneous and metastatic melanoma samples.

Shi Yang1, Dominick A Leone2, Asok Biswas3, April Deng4, Drazen Jukic5, Rajendra Singh6, Uma Sundram7, Meera Mahalingam8.   

Abstract

Despite the efficacy of BRAF-targeted and PD-L1-related immune therapies in tackling metastatic melanoma, a significant number of patients exhibit resistance. Given this, the objective of the current study was to ascertain concordance of somatic mutations in BRAF/NRAS/TERT and immunohistochemical PD-L1 and CD8 in matched primary cutaneous and metastatic melanoma. A total of 43 archival paired samples with sufficient material for genetic and immunohistochemical analyses met the criteria for inclusion in the study. Immunohistochemistry was performed for PD-L1 and CD8 and direct-DNA Sanger sequencing for BRAF/NRAS/TERT promoter mutational analyses. Agreement between paired samples was assessed using Cohen κ. Poor concordance among primary and corresponding metastases was noted in BRAF (9/42 cases discordant, κ = 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-0.77; P = .0013), TERT promoter mutations (13/41 cases discordant, κ = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.04-0.62; P = .033), tumoral PD-L1 immunoexpression (9/43 cases discordant, κ = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.07-0.72; P = .0099), and immunoexpression of CD8+ T lymphocytes (12/43 cases discordant, κ = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.19-0.69; P = .002). Although NRAS1 and NRAS2 were highly concordant (42/43 and 39/43 cases, respectively), discordant NRAS2 mutational status was associated with a median time to metastasis of 90 versus 455 days for pairs with concordant status (P = .07). Although limited by sample size, our findings suggest that consideration be given to mutational analysis of metastatic tissue rather than the primary to guide BRAF-targeted therapy and question the roles of TERT promoter mutations and PD-L1 as predictive biomarkers in malignant melanoma.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRAF; Melanoma; Metastasis; NRAS; PD-L1; TERT

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30120967     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2018.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  5 in total

1.  Identification of Three Genes Associated with Metastasis in Melanoma and Construction of a Predictive Model: A Multiracial Identification.

Authors:  Ying Chen; Dan Wang; Qingyun Li; Yiyi Zhang; Zheng Peng; Yu He; Bin Lin; Meifang Xu; Qiong Chen; Yang Chen
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 4.501

2.  Intra-patient Heterogeneity of BRAF and NRAS Molecular Alterations in Primary Melanoma and Metastases.

Authors:  Cristina Pellegrini; Ludovica Cardelli; Marina De Padova; Lucia Di Nardo; Valeria Ciciarelli; Tea Rocco; Gianluca Cipolloni; Marco Clementi; Alessio Cortellini; Alessandra Ventura; Pietro Leocata; Maria Concetta Fargnoli
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 3.875

Review 3.  Epigenetic modification and BRAF gene mutation in thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  Guo Huang; Juan Chen; Jun Zhou; Shuai Xiao; Weihong Zeng; Jiliang Xia; Xi Zeng
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2021-12-19       Impact factor: 5.722

4.  BRAF, C-KIT, and NRAS mutations correlated with different clinicopathological features: an analysis of 691 melanoma patients from a single center.

Authors:  Min Ren; Jing Zhang; Yunyi Kong; Qianming Bai; Peng Qi; Ling Zhang; Qian Wang; Xiaoyan Zhou; Yong Chen; Xiaoli Zhu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-01

5.  RTP4 is a novel prognosis-related hub gene in cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Yiqi Li; Jue Qi; Jiankang Yang
Journal:  Hereditas       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 3.271

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.