Literature DB >> 30120956

A prospective pilot comparison of wet and dry heparinized suction for EUS-guided liver biopsy (with videos).

Shaffer R S Mok1, David L Diehl1, Amitpal S Johal1, Harshit S Khara1, Bradley D Confer1, Prashant R Mudireddy1, H Lester Kirchner1, Zong-Ming E Chen1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: As EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling (EUS-LB) becomes more widely used, further studies have investigated ways to improve tissue yields. Use of a heparin-primed needle may lead to less clotting of blood within the needle, improve tissue recovery, and decrease fragmentation. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate wet suction using a heparin-primed needle for EUS-LB.
METHODS: This was a prospective crossover study evaluating wet suction for EUS-LB in parenchymal liver disease. The primary outcome was specimen adequacy, defined by an aggregate specimen length ≥15 mm and ≥5 complete portal tracts (CPTs). Secondary outcomes included number of CPTs, length of the longest piece, aggregate specimen length, and number of small (≤4 mm), medium (5-8 mm), and large (≥9 mm) fragments. Adverse events were tracked at 7 and 30 days.
RESULTS: One hundred twenty biopsy specimens were collected from 40 participants (3 specimens per patient). Specimen adequacy occurred in 39 wet heparin (98%), 37 dry heparin (93%), and 30 dry needle biopsy samples (80%; 95% confidence interval [CI], .14-.18; P = .01). There was no difference between dry needle techniques. Length of the longest piece was 8.9 mm for wet heparin and 5.8 mm for dry techniques (95% CI, .33-1.53; P = .003). Aggregate specimen length was 49.2 mm for wet heparin and 23.9 mm for dry heparin (95% CI, -46.34 to 44.94; P = .003). Mean CPT count was 7.0 for wet heparin versus 4.0 for dry (95% CI, .74-6.26; P = .01). There were more medium (2.0 vs 1.0; 95% CI, .06-1.24; P = .03) and large (1.0 versus 0.0; 95% CI, .33-1.53; P = .003) fragments with wet suction with no difference in small fragments between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of wet suction EUS-LB demonstrated improved tissue adequacy compared with dry needle techniques. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03103997.).
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30120956     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.07.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  6 in total

1.  The Evolving Role of Advanced Endoscopic Techniques in Hepatology.

Authors:  Mahmoud Mahfouz; Sunil Amin; Andres F Carrion
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2021-02

Review 2.  The Role of EUS in Liver Biopsy.

Authors:  Shaffer R S Mok; David L Diehl
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2019-01-31

3.  A Pilot Randomized Crossover Trial of Wet Suction and Conventional Techniques of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Upper Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions.

Authors:  Mika Takasumi; Takuto Hikichi; Minami Hashimoto; Jun Nakamura; Tsunetaka Kato; Hitomi Kikuchi; Yuichi Waragai; Ko Watanabe; Tadayuki Takagi; Rei Suzuki; Mitsuru Sugimoto; Manabu Hayashi; Yuki Sato; Hiroki Irie; Ryoichiro Kobashi; Yoshinori Okubo; Masao Kobayakawa; Hiromasa Ohira
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.260

4.  Role of endoscopic ultrasound in the field of hepatology: Recent advances and future trends.

Authors:  Jahnvi Dhar; Jayanta Samanta
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2021-11-27

Review 5.  Update on endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy.

Authors:  Shiva Rangwani; Devarshi R Ardeshna; Khalid Mumtaz; Sean G Kelly; Samuel Y Han; Somashekar G Krishna
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 5.374

6.  EUS-guided liver biopsy using a modified wet heparin suction technique.

Authors:  Ali Zakaria; Abdulrahman Diab; Michael Dowd; Pushpak Taunk; Ali Abbas
Journal:  VideoGIE       Date:  2022-08-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.