Literature DB >> 30120941

Long-Term Physical HRQOL Decreases After Single Lung as Compared With Double Lung Transplantation.

Denis M Gilmore1, Eric L Grogan2, Irene D Feurer3, Haley Hoy4, Scott A Rega4, Jean Barnes4, Regina Park4, Megan Staykov4, Michael Via4, Ciara M Shaver5, C Wright Pinson6, Eric S Lambright7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single lung transplantation (SLT) and double lung transplantation (DLT) are associated with differences in morbidity and mortality, although the effects of transplant type on patient-reported outcomes are not widely reported and conclusions have differed. Previous studies compared mean health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores but did not evaluate potentially different temporal trajectories in the context of longitudinal follow-up. To address this uncertainty, this study was designed to evaluate longitudinal HRQOL after SLT and DLT with the hypothesis that temporal trajectories differ between SLT and DLT.
METHODS: Patients transplanted at a single institution were eligible to be surveyed at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and then annually after transplant using the Short Form 36 Health Survey, with longitudinal physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores as the primary outcomes. Multivariable mixed-effects models were used to evaluate the effects of transplant type and time posttransplant on longitudinal PCS and MCS after adjusting age, diagnosis, rejection, Lung Allocation Score quartile, and intubation duration. Time by transplant type interaction effects were used to test whether the temporal trajectories of HRQOL differ between SLT and DLT recipients. HRQOL scores were referenced to general population norms (range, 40 to 60; mean, 50 ± 10) using accepted standards for a minimally important difference (½ SD, 5 points).
RESULTS: Postoperative surveys (n = 345) were analyzed for 136 patients (52% male, 23% SLT, age 52 ± 13 years, LAS 42 ± 12, follow-up 37 ± 29 months [range, 0.6 to 133]) who underwent lung transplantation between 2005 and 2016. After adjusting for model covariates, overall posttransplant PCS scores have a significant downward trajectory (p = 0.015) whereas MCS scores remain stable (p = 0.593), with both averaging within general population norms. The time by transplant type interaction effect (p = 0.002), however, indicate that posttransplant PCS scores of SLT recipients decline at a rate of 2.4 points per year over the total observation period compared to DLT. At approximately 60 months, the PCS scores of SLT recipients, but not DLT recipients, fall below general population norms.
CONCLUSIONS: The trajectory of physical HRQOL in patients receiving SLT declines over time compared with DLT, indicating that, in the longer term, SLT recipients are more likely to have physical HRQOL scores that fall substantively below general population norms. Physical HRQOL after 5 years may be a consideration for lung allocation and patient counseling regarding expectations when recommending SLT or DLT.
Copyright © 2018 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30120941      PMCID: PMC6240480          DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.06.072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  26 in total

1.  The registry of the international society for heart and lung transplantation: nineteenth official report-2002.

Authors:  Marshall I Hertz; David O Taylor; Elbert P Trulock; Mark M Boucek; Paul J Mohacsi; Leah B Edwards; Berkeley M Keck
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 10.247

2.  Surgical patient outcomes after the increased use of bilateral lung transplantation.

Authors:  Andrew C Chang; Kevin M Chan; Robert J Lonigro; Christine L Lau; Vibha N Lama; Kevin R Flaherty; Ros Florn; Allan Pickens; Susan Murray; Fernando J Martinez; Mark B Orringer
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  Health-related quality of life and symptom frequency before and after lung transplantation.

Authors:  K L MacNaughton; J R Rodrigue; M Cicale; E M Staples
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.863

5.  Single- versus double-lung transplantation for pulmonary hypertension.

Authors:  J S Gammie; R J Keenan; S M Pham; M F McGrath; B G Hattler; E Khoshbin; B P Griffith
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Improvement in quality of life after lung transplantation: a preliminary study. The University of Washington Medical Center Lung Transplant Study Group.

Authors:  S D Ramsey; D L Patrick; S Lewis; R K Albert; G Raghu
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 10.247

7.  Single vs bilateral, sequential lung transplantation for end-stage emphysema: influence of recipient age on survival and secondary end-points.

Authors:  D M Meyer; L E Bennett; R J Novick; J D Hosenpud
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 10.247

8.  Single versus bilateral lung transplantation for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a ten-year institutional experience.

Authors:  B F Meyers; J P Lynch; E P Trulock; T Guthrie; J D Cooper; G A Patterson
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Quality of life 1 year after lung transplantation.

Authors:  Christiane Kugler; Martin Strueber; Uwe Tegtbur; Jost Niedermeyer; Axel Haverich
Journal:  Prog Transplant       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.065

Review 10.  Incorporating quality of life and patient satisfaction measures into a transplant outcomes assessment program: technical and practical considerations.

Authors:  Irene D Feurer; Robert T Russell; C Wright Pinson
Journal:  Prog Transplant       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.065

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.