Literature DB >> 30120704

The effect of perceptual information on output interference.

Sharon Chen1, Kenneth J Malmberg2, Melissa Prince3, Shantai Peckoo4, Amy H Criss4.   

Abstract

Retrieval from episodic memory has consequences (Malmberg, Lehman, Annis, Criss, & Shiffrin, The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 61; 285-313, 2014). In some cases, the consequences are beneficial, as in the improvement in memory for items that were already retrieved (Izawa, 1970, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83(2, Pt.1), 340-344; Izawa, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89(1): 10-21, 1971; Roediger & Karpicke, Psychological Science, 17(3), 249-255, 2006). In other cases, the consequences are negative, as in the case of output interference (OI; Wickens, Borne, & Allen, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2, 440-445, 1963). OI is the decrease in accuracy in episodic memory with increasing test trials. A release from OI is observed when accuracy rebounds following a switch in the category of item being tested (Criss, Salomão, Malmberg, Aue, Kilic, & Claridge, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(4): 316-326, 2018; Malmberg, Criss, Gangwani, & Shiffrin, Psychological Science, 23(2): 115-119, 2012). In all reports thus far, a release from OI was observed when the conceptual information of stimuli was switched. Here, we evaluate the possibility that changing perceptual information causes a release from OI by presenting items in two perceptual forms (image, audio recording or printed text of the corresponding word) either mixed or blocked at test. A release from OI was observed only for images. We discuss the roles of conceptual and perceptual information in producing OI within the retrieving effectively from memory modeling framework.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Interference; Output interference; Perceptual information; Recognition memory

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30120704     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-018-1521-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  26 in total

1.  Modality effects in false recall and false recognition.

Authors:  D A Gallo; K B McDermott; J M Percer; H L Roediger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Perceptual match effects in direct tests of memory: the role of contextual fan.

Authors:  Lynne M Reder; Dimitrios K Donavos; Michael A Erickson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-03

3.  The "one-shot" hypothesis for context storage.

Authors:  Kenneth J Malmberg; Richard M Shiffrin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention.

Authors:  Henry L Roediger; Jeffrey D Karpicke
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-03

5.  Discriminating between changes in bias and changes in accuracy for recognition memory of emotional stimuli.

Authors:  Rebecca C Grider; Kenneth J Malmberg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-07

6.  A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory.

Authors:  R M Shiffrin; M Steyvers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1997-06

7.  Remember-Know and source memory instructions can qualitatively change old-new recognition accuracy: the modality-match effect in recognition memory.

Authors:  Neil W Mulligan; Miri Besken; Daniel Peterson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Models that allow us to perceive the world more accurately also allow us to remember past events more accurately via differentiation.

Authors:  Aslı Kılıç; Amy H Criss; Kenneth J Malmberg; Richard M Shiffrin
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03

10.  Release from output interference in recognition memory: A test of the attention hypothesis.

Authors:  Amy H Criss; Cristina Salomão; Kenneth J Malmberg; William Aue; Aslı Kılıç; MarkAvery Claridge
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 2.143

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.