Literature DB >> 30120442

Reading as Statistical Learning.

Joanne Arciuli1.   

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this tutorial is to explain how learning to read can be thought of as learning statistical regularities and to demonstrate why this is relevant for theory, modeling, and practice. This tutorial also shows how triangulation of methods and cross-linguistic research can be used to gain insight. Method: The impossibility of conveying explicitly all of the regularities that children need to acquire in a deep orthography, such as English, can be demonstrated by examining lesser-known probabilistic orthographic cues to lexical stress. Detection of these kinds of cues likely occurs via a type of implicit learning known as statistical learning (SL). The first part of the tutorial focuses on these points. Next, studies exploring how individual differences in the capacity for SL relate to variability in word reading accuracy in the general population are discussed. A brief overview of research linking impaired SL and dyslexia is also provided. The final part of the tutorial focuses on how we might supplement explicit literacy instruction with implicit learning methods and emphasizes the value of testing the efficacy of new techniques in the classroom. The basic and applied research reviewed here includes corpus analyses, behavioral testing, computational modeling, and classroom-based research. Although some of these methods are not commonly used in clinical research, the depth and breadth of this body of work provide a compelling case for why reading can be thought of as SL and how this view can inform practice.
Conclusion: Implicit methods that draw on the principles of SL can supplement the much-needed explicit instruction that helps children learn to read. This synergy of methods has the potential to spark innovative practices in literacy instruction and remediation provided by educators and clinicians to support typical learners and those with developmental disabilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30120442     DOI: 10.1044/2018_LSHSS-STLT1-17-0135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch        ISSN: 0161-1461            Impact factor:   2.983


  7 in total

1.  Probabilistic Decision-Making in Children With Dyslexia.

Authors:  Christa L Watson Pereira; Ran Zhou; Mark A Pitt; Jay I Myung; P Justin Rossi; Eduardo Caverzasi; Esther Rah; Isabel E Allen; Maria Luisa Mandelli; Marita Meyer; Zachary A Miller; Maria Luisa Gorno Tempini
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 5.152

2.  Individual differences in learning the regularities between orthography, phonology and semantics predict early reading skills.

Authors:  Noam Siegelman; Jay G Rueckl; Laura M Steacy; Stephen J Frost; Mark van den Bunt; Jason D Zevin; Mark S Seidenberg; Kenneth R Pugh; Donald L Compton; Robin D Morris
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 3.059

3.  Using information-theoretic measures to characterize the structure of the writing system: the case of orthographic-phonological regularities in English.

Authors:  Noam Siegelman; Devin M Kearns; Jay G Rueckl
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-06

4.  Neural correlates of sequence learning in children with developmental dyslexia.

Authors:  Martina Hedenius; Jonas Persson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 5.399

5.  The Role of Stimulus-Specific Perceptual Fluency in Statistical Learning.

Authors:  Andrew Perfors; Evan Kidd
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2022-02

6.  Knowledge of Statistics or Statistical Learning? Readers Prioritize the Statistics of their Native Language Over the Learning of Local Regularities.

Authors:  Jarosław R Lelonkiewicz; Michael T Ullman; Davide Crepaldi
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2022-02-21

7.  Statistical learning abilities of children with dyslexia across three experimental paradigms.

Authors:  Merel van Witteloostuijn; Paul Boersma; Frank Wijnen; Judith Rispens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.