| Literature DB >> 30120289 |
Shuolin Li1, Sida Liu1, Weicheng Chen1, Yuan Yuan1, Ruoyi Gu1, Yangliu Song1,2, Jian Li1, Yinyin Cao1, Yixiang Lin1, Jun Xu1, Huijun Wang1,2, Duan Ma2,3, Xiaojing Ma1,2, Wei Sheng4,5, Guoying Huang6,7.
Abstract
Heterotaxy syndrome (HTX) is characterized by left-right (LR) asymmetry disturbances associated with severe heart malformations. However, the exact genetic cause of HTX pathogenesis remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the pathogenic mechanism underlying heterotaxy syndrome. Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed for twenty-two candidate genes correlated with LR axis development in sixty-six HTX patients from unrelated families. Variants were filtered from databases and predicted in silico using prediction programs. A total of twenty-one potential disease-causing variants were identified in seven genes. Next, we used Sanger sequencing to confirm the identified variants in the family pedigree and found a novel hemizygous mutation (c.890G > T, p.C297F) in the ZIC3 gene in a male patient that was inherited from his mother, who was a carrier. The results of functional indicated that this ZIC3 mutation decreases transcriptional activity, affects the affinity of the GLI-binding site and results in aberrant cellular localization in transfected cells. Moreover, morpholino-knockdown experiments in zebrafish demonstrated that zic3 mutant mRNA failed to rescue the abnormal phenotype, suggesting a role for the novel ZIC3 mutation in heterotaxy syndrome.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30120289 PMCID: PMC6098004 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-30204-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Demographics and clinical characteristics of the patients (n = 66).
| Variable | N or mean | % or range |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Male | 46 | 70 |
| Female | 20 | 30 |
| Age (month) [Median (IQR)] | 36 (9.5–78) | |
| Visceral situs | ||
| Solitus | 0 | 0 |
| Inversus | 13 | 20 |
| Ambiguous | 53 | 80 |
| Cardiac position | ||
| Levocardia | 24 | 36 |
| Dextrocardia | 40 | 60 |
| Mesocardia | 2 | 3 |
| Combined cardia phenotype | ||
| ASD | 28 | 42 |
| VSD | 23 | 35 |
| AVSD | 20 | 30 |
| TGA | 34 | 52 |
| DORV | 22 | 33 |
| DOLV | 4 | 6 |
| BSVC | 10 | 15 |
| PLSVC | 5 | 8 |
| TAPVD | 5 | 8 |
| Single atrium | 8 | 12 |
| Atrium isomerism | 15 | 23 |
| Ventricular morphology | ||
| Two ventricles of equal size | 41 | 62 |
| Single Ventricle | 25 | 38 |
| Ventricular loop (%) | ||
| D-loop | 28 | 42 |
| L-Loop | 31 | 47 |
| Unknown | 7 | 11 |
| Spleen morphology, position | ||
| Normal | 35 | 53 |
| Asplenia | 16 | 24 |
| Polyspenia | 3 | 5 |
| Right side spleen | 12 | 18 |
| Liver | ||
| Normal | 40 | 61 |
| Reverse | 13 | 20 |
| Middle | 13 | 20 |
| Stomach | ||
| Normal | 53 | 80 |
| Reverse | 12 | 18 |
| Middle | 1 | 2 |
Detailed cardiac anatomy of children with HTX. IQR, Interquartile range; ASD, atrial septal defect; VSD, ventricular septal defect; AVSD, atrioventricular septal defect; TGA, transposition of the great arteries; DORV, double outlet right ventricle; DOLV, double outlet left ventricle; BSVC, bilateral superior vena cava; PLSVC, persistent left superior vena cava; TPAVD, total anomalous pulmonary venous drainage.
All novel and rare genetic variants detect in the 22 genes.
| Gene | Mutated case | CDS | Amino Acid change | zygosity | rsID | MAF | SIFT | Polyphen2 | MutationTaster | ExAc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNAH5 | 5032 | c.13364C > A | p. Gly4455Asp | Het | rs370684795 | 0.0002 | D | D | D | 0.0003135 |
| 5041 | c.12367C > T | p. His4123Tyr | Het | rs151145750 | 0.0008 | D | P | D | 0.0007023 | |
| 5056 | c.12595C > T | p. Arg4199Cys | Het | rs374874272 | 0.00002 | D | D | D | 0 | |
| 5063 | c.10169A > G | p. Asp3390Gly | Het | This study | NA | D | B | D | 0 | |
| 5042 | c.7123A > T | p. Ile2375Phe | Het | rs529696058 | 0.00002 | D | P | D | 0.0003469 | |
| 5078/5133 | c.6053T > C | p. Ile2018Thr | Het | rs117989731 | 0.0004 | D | D | D | 0.001041 | |
| 5102/5145/5188 | c.12472C > T | p. Arg4158Trp | Het | rs3756672 | 0.0130 | D | D | D | 0.004219 | |
| 5119 | c.9781A > G | p. Lys3261Glu | Het | rs146215039 | 0.0006 | T | B | D | 0.0002636 | |
| 5138 | c.9236G > A | p. Arg3079Gln | Het | This study | NA | T | P | D | 0.00008246 | |
| ARMC4 | 5071 | c. 1679C > T | p. Ala560Val | Het | This study | NA | D | D | D | 0.00002482 |
| MEGF8 | 5071 | c.3109C > T | p. Arg1037Trp | Het | rs370522595 | 0.0005 | D | D | D | 0.0004647 |
| 5041 | c.8068C > A | p. Pro2690Thr | Het | This study | NA | T | P | D | 0 | |
| SHROOM3 | 5052 | c.580C > A | p. His194Asn | Het | This study | NA | D | D | D | 0 |
| 5101/5126 | c.4726A > G | p. Lys1576Glu | Het | rs1396351 | 0.0016 | D | P | N | 0.0008678 | |
| 5138 | c.2905C > T | p. Arg969Trp | Het | rs3733245 | 0.00842 | D | B | D | 0.001332 | |
| NPHP4 | 5056 | c.2198G > A | p. Gly733Asp | Het | rs587783027 | 0.0001 | D | D | D | 0.001476 |
| 5050 | c.880G > A | p. Gly294Ser | Het | This study | NA | D | D | D | 0 | |
| 5020/5072 | c.694C > T | p. Arg232Cys | Het | rs572497035 | 0.0001 | D | D | D | 0.0001258 | |
| 5044 | c.3160C > T | p. Arg1054Cys | Het | rs373369949 | 0.0002 | D | D | D | 0.002275 | |
| ACVR2B | 5204 | c.1219G > A | p. Val407Met | Het | This study | NA | D | P | D | 0 |
| ZIC3 | 5183 | c.890G > T | p. Cys297Phe | Hemi | This study | NA | D | D | D | 0 |
MAF, minor allele frequency; the date is from NCBI dbSNP data base and we use 1000 Genomes data.
Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) version 3: minor allele frequencies for individuals of European descent are shown.
T: tolerant; P: probably damage; D: disease causing; B: Benign; Het: Heterozygous; Hemi: Hemizygous.
Figure 1Clinical features of the proband and the ZIC3 gene mutation. (a) Chest radiograph showing dextrocardia in the patient. (b) CT scan indicating that the liver and spleen of the patient are reversed, while the stomach is located in the middle of the body. (c) The trio family of the proband, in which the mother is a carrier. (d) Sanger sequencing results show that the hemizygous ZIC3 mutation was found in the proband, while his father did not carry this mutation, but his mother was a heterozygous carrier. The gray background indicates the nucleotide change from G to T in the patient at position 890.
Figure 2Position of the ZIC3 variant and the corresponding protein structure change. (a) The position of the mutation at the end of exon one, corresponding to the third amino acid of the second C2H2 domain of the ZIC3 protein. (b) Alignment of multiple ZIC3 protein sequences among several species. The altered amino acid boxed in yellow is completely conserved evolutionarily across various species. Homo. S: Homo sapiens; Mus. M: Mus musculus; Danio. R: Danio rerio; Numida. M: Numida meleagris; Columba. L: Columba livia; Anas. P: Anas platyrhynchos; Heterocephalus. G: Heterocephalus glaber. (c,d) Comparison of the wild-type ZIC3 protein structure with the mutant using SWISS-MODEL. Panel c shows that wild-type ZIC3 harbors a cysteine at amino acid No. 297, and the ZIC3 protein structure contains four ligands. Panel d indicates that variant changed the amino acid residue from cysteine to phenylalanine, indicating that only three ligands exist in the mutant protein.
Figure 3The ZIC3 mutation causes functional changes in cell lines. (a) A western blot showed that the ZIC3 wildtype (WT) and mutant (MU) forms are being expressed as equal levels for the EMSA experiment. (b) The ZIC3 domain binds to the GLI-binding site (GLBS). Line 1: Only the GLI probe without protein; line 2: GLI probe + protein in 293T cells; line 3: unlabeled competitor GLI probe + protein in 293T cells; line 4: GLI probe + protein in 293T cells transfected with pZIC3 (WT)-myc; line 5: unlabeled competitor GLI probe + protein in 293T cells transfected with pZIC3 (WT)-myc; line 6: GLI probe + protein in 293T cells transfected with pZIC3 (MU)-myc; line 7: unlabeled competitor GLI probe + protein in 293T cells transfected with pZIC3 (MU)-myc. The red arrow indicates the complex of GLIBS with the ZIC3 protein. (c) A supershift EMSA showed that c-Myc antibody could specific bind with whole cell lysate which transfected pZIC3-myc construct. Line 1–4 added biotin-labeled probe. (d) The wild-type (pZIC3-myc) or mutant (p.Cys297Phe) ZIC3 construct was co-transfected into NIH/3T3, H9C2, and HEK-293T cells with pGL3-SV40 firefly and pRL-TK Renilla luciferase reporters. Luciferase activities were measured 24 hours post-transfection. The mean fold activation relative to the wild-type is shown. The results represent the average luciferase activation across a minimum of three individual experiments. Standard errors are indicated by vertical lines. “**” Denotes statistical significance (P < 0.05) by two-tailed, unpaired Student’s t-tests assuming unequal variance. (e–j) Subcellular localization of ZIC3 determined by immunofluorescence in NIH3T3 cell lines. For each construct, anti-Myc (panels f,i) and DAPI (panels e,h) staining is shown individually and merged (panels g,j). The wild-type (WT) construct is located in the nucleus (panel f), but the C297A missense mutation construct is located in both the cytoplasm and nucleus (panel i). Scale bar indicates 63X magnification. (k) Percentage of localization. Cells transfected with the WT or MU ZIC3 construct were classified as exhibiting either only nuclear localization or both nuclear and cytoplasmic localization. ***P < 0.0001 by the Chi-square test.
Figure 4zic3 knockdown in zebrafish embryos results in laterality defects. (a–c) Wild-type (WT) zebrafish showed normal cardiac looping, while in zebrafish injected with 2.0 ng of the ZIC3 mRNA transcript blocking morpholino (TB-MO) or co-injected 2.0 ng of the TB-MO and 200 pg of mutant mRNA (Mu), the hearts were located at the midline or were reversed. The red line denotes the heart looping angle in normal, midline and reversed hearts. (d–f) In situ hybridization using a heart-specific probe (cmcl2) showed that WT embryos predominantly exhibited normal heart looping. In contrast, heart looping was often observed at the midline or reversed in zic3 TB-MO-injected or mutant rescued embryos. (g) The graph shows the distribution of cmcl2 expression observed in the embryos injected with the control MO (n = 168), 2.0 ng zic3 TB-MO (n = 192), 100 pg ZIC3 (WT) mRNA + 2.0 ng zic3 TB-MO (n = 166), or 100 pg ZIC3 (mu) mRNA + 2.0 ng zic3 TB-MO (n = 232). The WT but not mutant human zic3 mRNA partially rescued the zebrafish heart looping defects. (h–m) In contrast to the WT zebrafish, curly tail was found in the zic3 knockdown zebrafish injected with 2.0 ng of zic3 TB-MO. Furthermore, the phenotypes of the mutant rescued group were extremely obvious. The red arrow indicates the curly tail. (n) The graph shows the distribution of the curly tail phenotype in the Control (Ctrol) MO (n = 254), 2.0 ng zic3 TB-MO (n = 266), 100 pg ZIC3 (WT) mRNA + 2.0 ng zic3 TB-MO (n = 242), and 100 pg ZIC3 (mu) mRNA + 2.0 ng zic3 TB-MO (n = 261) groups. **P < 0.05, ***P < 0.005, NS indicates not significant by Fisher’s exact test. Scale bars: 16X (panel c) and 150 µM (panel f).