Literature DB >> 30119941

Randomized Controlled Trial of Intravenous Acetaminophen Versus Intravenous Hydromorphone for the Treatment of Acute Pain in the Emergency Department.

Douglas P Barnaby1, Andrew E Chertoff2, Andrew J Restivo2, Caron M Campbell2, Scott Pearlman2, Deborah White2, Polly E Bijur2, E John Gallagher2.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: As clinicians look to nonnarcotic analgesics in the emergency department (ED), it is essential to understand the effectiveness and adverse effects of nonopioid medications in comparison with existing opioid treatments. Studies of intravenous acetaminophen for acute pain in the ED demonstrate mixed results and suffer from small sample sizes and methodological limitations. This study compares intravenous hydromorphone with intravenous acetaminophen in adult ED patients presenting with acute pain.
METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, clinical trial comparing 1 g intravenous acetaminophen with 1 mg intravenous hydromorphone for treatment of adults with severe, acute pain in the ED. The primary outcome was between-group difference in change in numeric rating scale from baseline to 60 minutes postadministration of study medication. Secondary outcomes included the difference in proportion of patients in each group who declined additional analgesia at 60 minutes, received additional medication before 60 minutes, and developed nausea, vomiting, or pruritus.
RESULTS: Of 220 subjects randomized, 103 patients in each arm had sufficient data for analysis. At 60 minutes, the mean decrease in numeric rating scale pain score was 5.3 in the hydromorphone arm and 3.3 in the acetaminophen arm, a difference of 2.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2 to 2.7) favoring hydromorphone. A greater proportion of patients in the hydromorphone arm also declined additional analgesia at 60 minutes (65% versus 44%; difference 21%; (95% CI 8% to 35%). There was no difference in the proportion of patients receiving rescue analgesia before 60 minutes. Significantly more subjects in the hydromorphone group developed nausea (19% versus 3%; difference 16%; 95% CI 4% to 28%) and vomiting (14% versus 3%; difference 11%; 95% CI 0% to 23%).
CONCLUSION: Although both 1 mg intravenous hydromorphone and 1 g intravenous acetaminophen provided clinically meaningful reductions in pain scores, treatment with hydromorphone provided both clinically and statistically greater analgesia than acetaminophen, at the cost of a higher incidence of nausea and vomiting.
Copyright © 2018 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30119941     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.06.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  3 in total

1.  Opioid and non-opioid pain relief after an emergency department acute pain visit.

Authors:  Raoul Daoust; Jean Paquet; Alexis Cournoyer; Éric Piette; Judy Morris; Justine Lessard; Véronique Castonguay; Gilles Lavigne; Vérilibe Huard; Jean-Marc Chauny
Journal:  CJEM       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.410

2.  Intravenous acetaminophen does not reduce morphine use for pain relief in emergency department patients: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Bruno Minotti; Gregory Mansella; Robert Sieber; Alexander Ott; Christian H Nickel; Roland Bingisser
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2022-05-22       Impact factor: 5.221

3.  Temporal Factors Associated With Opioid Prescriptions for Patients With Pain Conditions in an Urban Emergency Department.

Authors:  Ben C Smith; Andrew D Vigotsky; A Vania Apkarian; Thomas J Schnitzer
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-03-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.