Aline B Maddux1, Matthew Cox-Martin2,3, Michael Dichiaro4, Tellen D Bennett1,3. 1. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO. 2. Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO. 3. Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO. 4. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the association between the Functional Status Scale and Pediatric Functional Independence Measure scores during the rehabilitation stay in children who survive traumatic brain injury. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary care children's hospital with a level 1 trauma center and inpatient rehabilitation service. PATIENTS: Sixty-five children less than 18 years old admitted to an ICU with acute traumatic brain injury and subsequently transferred to the inpatient rehabilitation service. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Functional Status Scale and Pediatric Functional Independence Measure at transfer to rehabilitation and Pediatric Functional Independence Measure at discharge from rehabilitation. The median age of the cohort was 7.1 years (interquartile range, 0.8-12.3 yr), and 29% were female. Nearly all of the children were healthy prior to the traumatic brain injury: six patients (9.2%) had a baseline Functional Status Scale score greater than 6. At the time of transfer to inpatient rehabilitation, total Functional Status Scale and Pediatric Functional Independence Measure scores had the expected negative correlation due to increasing disability resulting in lower scores in Pediatric Functional Independence Measure and higher scores in Functional Status Scale (r = -0.49; 95% CI, -0.62 to -0.35). Among subjects with less disability as measured by lower total Functional Status Scale scores, we found substantial variability in the total Pediatric Functional Independence Measure scores. In contrast, Pediatric Functional Independence Measure scores were consistently low among subjects with a wide range of higher total Functional Status Scale scores (more disability). CONCLUSIONS: Although proprietary and more time-intensive, the Pediatric Functional Independence Measure has advantages relative to the Functional Status Scale for less severely injured patients and task-specific measurements. The Functional Status Scale may have advantages relative to the Pediatric Functional Independence Measure for more severely injured patients. Further investigations are needed to characterize changes in the Functional Status Scale during the rehabilitation stay and after discharge.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the association between the Functional Status Scale and Pediatric Functional Independence Measure scores during the rehabilitation stay in children who survive traumatic brain injury. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary care children's hospital with a level 1 trauma center and inpatient rehabilitation service. PATIENTS: Sixty-five children less than 18 years old admitted to an ICU with acute traumatic brain injury and subsequently transferred to the inpatient rehabilitation service. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Functional Status Scale and Pediatric Functional Independence Measure at transfer to rehabilitation and Pediatric Functional Independence Measure at discharge from rehabilitation. The median age of the cohort was 7.1 years (interquartile range, 0.8-12.3 yr), and 29% were female. Nearly all of the children were healthy prior to the traumatic brain injury: six patients (9.2%) had a baseline Functional Status Scale score greater than 6. At the time of transfer to inpatient rehabilitation, total Functional Status Scale and Pediatric Functional Independence Measure scores had the expected negative correlation due to increasing disability resulting in lower scores in Pediatric Functional Independence Measure and higher scores in Functional Status Scale (r = -0.49; 95% CI, -0.62 to -0.35). Among subjects with less disability as measured by lower total Functional Status Scale scores, we found substantial variability in the total Pediatric Functional Independence Measure scores. In contrast, Pediatric Functional Independence Measure scores were consistently low among subjects with a wide range of higher total Functional Status Scale scores (more disability). CONCLUSIONS: Although proprietary and more time-intensive, the Pediatric Functional Independence Measure has advantages relative to the Functional Status Scale for less severely injured patients and task-specific measurements. The Functional Status Scale may have advantages relative to the Pediatric Functional Independence Measure for more severely injured patients. Further investigations are needed to characterize changes in the Functional Status Scale during the rehabilitation stay and after discharge.
Authors: Stephen R McCauley; Elisabeth A Wilde; Vicki A Anderson; Gary Bedell; Sue R Beers; Thomas F Campbell; Sandra B Chapman; Linda Ewing-Cobbs; Joan P Gerring; Gerard A Gioia; Harvey S Levin; Linda J Michaud; Mary R Prasad; Bonnie R Swaine; Lyn S Turkstra; Shari L Wade; Keith O Yeates Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2011-08-24 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: C Limperopoulos; A Majnemer; M I Shevell; B Rosenblatt; C Rohlicek; C Tchervenkov; H Z Darwish Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Sydney A Rice; James A Blackman; Susan Braun; Richard T Linn; Carl V Granger; Douglas P Wagner Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: L Ewing-Cobbs; L Kramer; M Prasad; D N Canales; P T Louis; J M Fletcher; H Vollero; S H Landry; K Cheung Journal: Pediatrics Date: 1998-08 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Mary E Aitken; Melissa L McCarthy; Beth S Slomine; Ru Ding; Dennis R Durbin; Kenneth M Jaffe; Charles N Paidas; Andrea M Dorsch; James R Christensen; Ellen J Mackenzie Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Christian M Niedzwecki; Jennifer H Marwitz; Jessica M Ketchum; David X Cifu; Charles M Dillard; Eugenio A Monasterio Journal: J Head Trauma Rehabil Date: 2008 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.710
Authors: Melissa L McCarthy; Ellen J MacKenzie; Dennis R Durbin; Mary E Aitken; Kenneth M Jaffe; Charles N Paidas; Beth S Slomine; Andrea M Dorsch; James R Christensen; Ru Ding Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2006-03
Authors: M E Msall; K DiGaudio; B T Rogers; S LaForest; N L Catanzaro; J Campbell; F Wilczenski; L C Duffy Journal: Clin Pediatr (Phila) Date: 1994-07 Impact factor: 1.168
Authors: Daniël Bossen; Rosa M de Boer; Hendrika Knoester; Jolanda M Maaskant; Marike van der Schaaf; Mattijs W Alsem; Reinoud J B J Gemke; Job B M van Woensel; Jaap Oosterlaan; Raoul H H Engelbert Journal: Crit Care Explor Date: 2021-06-15
Authors: Emily Z Holding; Elise M Turner; Trevor A Hall; Skyler Leonard; Kathryn R Bradbury; Cydni N Williams Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2021-07-16 Impact factor: 3.532