Literature DB >> 30118426

How Should We Enhance the Process and Purpose of Prognostic Communication in Oncology?

Bryan A Sisk1, Jennifer W Mack2.   

Abstract

We propose that effective prognostic communication requires attention to the process and purpose of communication, where purpose represents the will and process the ability to communicate. Prognostic communication has historically challenged clinicians and patients. Few interventions have been developed to improve prognostic communication, and those that have been developed largely target the process of communication. We argue that more work is needed to address the purpose of prognostic communication, because the first step in all effective communication is desiring to communicate well. In developing communication interventions, investigators should be thoughtful about the audience they are targeting, the goals of the intervention, and the feasibility of disseminating and implementing the intervention in busy health care systems with limited resources.
© 2018 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30118426     DOI: 10.1001/amajethics.2018.757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMA J Ethics


  4 in total

1.  Are we meeting the informational needs of cancer patients and families? Perception of physician communication in pediatric oncology.

Authors:  Deena R Levine; Erik Liederbach; Liza-Marie Johnson; Erica C Kaye; Holly Spraker-Perlman; Belinda Mandrell; Michele Pritchard; April Sykes; Zhaohua Lu; Dave Wendler; Justin N Baker
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Physicians working in oncology identified challenges and factors that facilitated communication with families when children could not be cured.

Authors:  Camilla Udo; Ulrika Kreicbergs; Bertil Axelsson; Olle Björk; Malin Lövgren
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 2.299

3.  Communication about Prognosis during Patient-Initiated Second Opinion Consultations in Advanced Cancer Care: An Observational Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  N C A van der Velden; M B A van der Kleij; V Lehmann; E M A Smets; J M L Stouthard; I Henselmans; M A Hillen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Oncologists' experience with discussing cancer prognosis with patients and families: perspectives from India.

Authors:  Sravannthi Maya; Smita C Banerjee; Shweta Chawak; Patricia A Parker; Sreekanth Kandikattu; Mahati Chittem
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 3.626

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.