Literature DB >> 30118370

Medicare Utilization and Spending Among Nurses Compared with the General United States Population.

Nirav S Kapadia1,2, Andrea M Austin1, Donald Q Carmichael1, Qianfei Wang1, Elisabeth D Erekson1, Diane Feskanich3, Francine Grodstein3, Anna N A Tosteson1,2, Julie P W Bynum1.   

Abstract

Background: To better understand health habits in older nurses versus the general population, we sought to determine whether the demographics, health care utilization, and Medicare spending by the Nurses' Health Study (NHS) participants enrolled in Medicare and a matched sample of Medicare beneficiaries meaningfully differed. Materials and
Methods: Analytic cohorts included a random 20% sample of Medicare beneficiaries continuously enrolled in fee for service (FFS) Medicare that were propensity matched to the NHS participants continuously enrolled in FFS Medicare in a single year (2012). Matching was based upon preselected demographic factors and health status, using a nearest-neighbor matching algorithm to obtain a 1:1 match without replacement. Healthcare utilization and spending were compared between the two groups; we also stratified findings by number of chronic comorbidities.
Results: Similar rates of utilization of primary care and most outpatient services. However, NHS participants had slightly higher rates of cancer screening, specialist care, and inpatient surgery were observed. When stratified by comorbidity status, the largest differences in utilization and spending were found in women with no comorbidity. Conclusions: The modest differences in observed healthcare utilization and spending suggest that older healthcare professionals may access care in fairly similar ways to the general population, and that health status may be a more important determinant of utilization and spending than health profession in older age groups.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nurses' Health Study; administrative claims data; generalizability studies; healthcare spending; healthcare utilization; linkage studies

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30118370      PMCID: PMC6306677          DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  11 in total

1.  Geography and the debate over Medicare reform.

Authors:  John E Wennberg; Elliott S Fisher; Jonathan S Skinner
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2002 Jul-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  The nurses' health study.

Authors:  C F Belanger; C H Hennekens; B Rosner; F E Speizer
Journal:  Am J Nurs       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 2.220

3.  The Elixhauser comorbidity method outperforms the Charlson index in predicting inpatient death after orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Mariano E Menendez; Valentin Neuhaus; C Niek van Dijk; David Ring
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  120 000 Nurses Who Shook Public Health.

Authors:  Alfredo Morabia
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Origin, Methods, and Evolution of the Three Nurses' Health Studies.

Authors:  Ying Bao; Monica L Bertoia; Elizabeth B Lenart; Meir J Stampfer; Walter C Willett; Frank E Speizer; Jorge E Chavarro
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 6.  The Nurses' Health Study: lifestyle and health among women.

Authors:  Graham A Colditz; Susan E Hankinson
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Prices don't drive regional Medicare spending variations.

Authors:  Daniel J Gottlieb; Weiping Zhou; Yunjie Song; Kathryn Gilman Andrews; Jonathan S Skinner; Jason M Sutherland
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  The Nurses' Health Study: 20-year contribution to the understanding of health among women.

Authors:  G A Colditz; J E Manson; S E Hankinson
Journal:  J Womens Health       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 9.  Systematic review of comorbidity indices for administrative data.

Authors:  Mansour T A Sharabiani; Paul Aylin; Alex Bottle
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  3 in total

1.  Patient-Provider Discussions About Urinary Incontinence Among Older Women.

Authors:  Giulia I Lane; Kaitlin Hagan; Elisabeth Erekson; Vatche A Minassian; Francine Grodstein; Julie Bynum
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 6.053

2.  Outpatient Evaluation and Management Visits for Urinary Incontinence in Older Women.

Authors:  Elisabeth Erekson; Kaitlin A Hagan; Andrea Austin; Donald Carmichael; Vatche A Minassian; Francine Grodstein; Julie P W Bynum
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Comparison of treatment of early-stage breast cancer among Nurses' Health Study participants and other Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Andrea M Austin; Nirav S Kapadia; Gabriel A Brooks; Tracy L Onega; A Heather Eliassen; Rulla M Tamimi; Michelle Holmes; Qianfei Wang; Francine Grodstein; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 4.872

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.