Literature DB >> 30118239

Susceptibility of Antibody CDR Residues to Chemical Modifications Can Be Revealed Prior to Antibody Humanization and Aid in the Lead Selection Process.

Ankai Xu, Hok Seon Kim, Samarkand Estee, Sharon ViaJar, William J Galush, Avinash Gill, Isidro Hötzel, Greg A Lazar, Paul McDonald, Nisana Andersen, Christoph Spiess.   

Abstract

A critical part of the clinical development path for a therapeutic antibody involves evaluating the physical and chemical stability of candidate molecules throughout the manufacturing process. In particular, the risks of chemical liabilities that can impact antigen binding, such as deamidation, oxidation, and isomerization in the antibody CDR sequences, need to be controlled through formulation development or eliminated by replacing the amino acid motif displaying the chemical instability. Commonly, the antibody CDR sequence contains multiple sequence motifs (potential hotspots) for chemical instability. However, only a subset of these motifs results in actual chemical modification, and thus, experimental assessment of the extent of instability is necessary to identify positions for potential sequence engineering. Ideally, this information should be available prior to antibody humanization at the stage of parental rodent antibody identification. Early knowledge of liabilities allows for ranking of clones or the mitigation of liabilities by concurrent engineering with the antibody humanization process instead of time-consuming sequential activities. However, concurrent engineering of chemical liabilities and humanization requires translatability of the chemical modifications from the rodent parental antibody to the humanized. We experimentally compared the stability of all sequence motifs by mass spectrometric peptide mapping between the rodent parental antibody and the final humanized antibody and observed a linear correlation. These results have enabled a streamlined developability assessment process for therapeutic antibodies from lead discovery to clinical development.

Entities:  

Keywords:  deamidation; developability assessment; isomerization; oxidation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30118239     DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.8b00536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Pharm        ISSN: 1543-8384            Impact factor:   4.939


  5 in total

1.  Engineering an anti-CD52 antibody for enhanced deamidation stability.

Authors:  Huawei Qiu; Ronnie Wei; Julie Jaworski; Ekaterina Boudanova; Heather Hughes; Scott VanPatten; Anders Lund; Jaime Day; Yanfeng Zhou; Tracey McSherry; Clark Q Pan; Rebecca Sendak
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 5.857

2.  Accelerated antibody discovery targeting the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein for COVID-19 therapeutic potential.

Authors:  Tracey E Mullen; Rashed Abdullah; Jacqueline Boucher; Anna Susi Brousseau; Narayan K Dasuri; Noah T Ditto; Andrew M Doucette; Chloe Emery; Justin Gabriel; Brendan Greamo; Ketan S Patil; Kelly Rothenberger; Justin Stolte; Colby A Souders
Journal:  Antib Ther       Date:  2021-08-28

3.  Analysis of Glutamine Deamidation: Products, Pathways, and Kinetics.

Authors:  Dylan L Riggs; Jacob W Silzel; Yana A Lyon; Amrik S Kang; Ryan R Julian
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Predicting Antibody Developability Profiles Through Early Stage Discovery Screening.

Authors:  Marc Bailly; Carl Mieczkowski; Veronica Juan; Essam Metwally; Daniela Tomazela; Jeanne Baker; Makiko Uchida; Ester Kofman; Fahimeh Raoufi; Soha Motlagh; Yao Yu; Jihea Park; Smita Raghava; John Welsh; Michael Rauscher; Gopalan Raghunathan; Mark Hsieh; Yi-Ling Chen; Hang Thu Nguyen; Nhung Nguyen; Dan Cipriano; Laurence Fayadat-Dilman
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 5.  In silico prediction of post-translational modifications in therapeutic antibodies.

Authors:  Shabdita Vatsa
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 5.857

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.