Literature DB >> 30117164

Body mass index, calcium supplementation and risk of colorectal adenomas.

Elizabeth L Barry1, Jennifer L Lund2, Daniel Westreich2, Leila A Mott1, Dennis J Ahnen3, Gerald J Beck4, Roberd M Bostick5, Robert S Bresalier6, Carol A Burke7, Timothy R Church8, Judy R Rees1, Douglas J Robertson9, John A Baron1,2,10.   

Abstract

Calcium supplementation (1,200 mg/day) did not significantly reduce colorectal adenomas in our recent randomized, controlled trial (Vitamin D/Calcium Polyp Prevention Study, VCPPS, 2004-2013) in contrast to our previous trial (Calcium Polyp Prevention Study, CPPS, 1988-1996). To reconcile these findings, we identified participant characteristics that differed between the study populations and modified the effect of calcium supplementation on adenomas or high-risk findings (advanced or multiple adenomas). Compared to the CPPS, more participants in the VCPPS were obese (body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2 ; 37.5% vs. 24.4%) and fewer had normal BMI (BMI <25 kg/m2 ; 18.5% vs. 31%). BMI appeared to modify the effect of calcium supplementation on adenomas and especially on high risk-findings: in the VCPPS, there was a 44% reduction in high-risk findings among individuals whose BMI was normal (RR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.26-1.23), but not among overweight (RR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.62-1.91) or obese (RR = 1.54, 95% CI = 0.92-2.57) individuals (pinteraction = 0.03). Similarly, in the CPPS, there was a 56% reduction in high-risk findings among individuals whose BMI was normal (RR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.26-0.74), but not among overweight (RR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.55-1.39) or obese (RR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.57-1.82) individuals (pinteraction = 0.02). Standardization of each trial's findings to the BMI distribution in the other attenuated calcium's protective effect on adenomas in the CPPS but enhanced it in the VCPPS. In conclusion, 1,200 mg/day calcium supplementation may reduce risk of colorectal adenomas among those with normal BMI but not in overweight or obese individuals; and differences in BMI distribution partially account for the apparent difference in calcium efficacy between the two trials.
© 2018 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  body mass index; calcium supplementation; clinical trial; colorectal adenoma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30117164      PMCID: PMC6294679          DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  49 in total

1.  Total calcium intake and colorectal adenoma in young women.

Authors:  Jennifer Massa; Eunyoung Cho; Endel J Orav; Walter C Willett; Kana Wu; Edward L Giovannucci
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Volumetric dilution, rather than sequestration best explains the low vitamin D status of obesity.

Authors:  Andjela T Drincic; Laura A G Armas; Eileen E Van Diest; Robert P Heaney
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 5.002

Review 3.  Molecular mechanisms of cancer development in obesity.

Authors:  Melin J Khandekar; Paul Cohen; Bruce M Spiegelman
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  Interaction of calcium supplementation and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the risk of colorectal adenomas.

Authors:  Maria V Grau; John A Baron; Elizabeth L Barry; Robert S Sandler; Robert W Haile; Jack S Mandel; Bernard F Cole
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Role of supplemental calcium in the recurrence of colorectal adenomas: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Aasma Shaukat; Nicole Scouras; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 6.  Dietary supplement use and colorectal cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analyses of prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  Renate C Heine-Bröring; Renate M Winkels; Jacoba M S Renkema; Lea Kragt; Anne-Claire B van Orten-Luiten; Ettje F Tigchelaar; Doris S M Chan; Teresa Norat; Ellen Kampman
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Dairy food, calcium, and risk of cancer in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study.

Authors:  Yikyung Park; Michael F Leitzmann; Amy F Subar; Albert Hollenbeck; Arthur Schatzkin
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-02-23

Review 8.  Obesity and cancer--mechanisms underlying tumour progression and recurrence.

Authors:  Jiyoung Park; Thomas S Morley; Min Kim; Deborah J Clegg; Philipp E Scherer
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 9.  Bile acids, obesity, and the metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Huijuan Ma; Mary Elizabeth Patti
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.043

10.  Calcium as a chemopreventive agent against colorectal neoplasm: does obesity play a role?

Authors:  NaNa Keum; Hanseul Kim; Edward L Giovannucci
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 2.506

View more
  2 in total

1.  Obesity and efficacy of vitamin D3 supplementation in healthy black adults.

Authors:  Hanseul Kim; Paulette Chandler; Kimmie Ng; JoAnn E Manson; Edward Giovannucci
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  No Evidence for Posttreatment Effects of Vitamin D and Calcium Supplementation on Risk of Colorectal Adenomas in a Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Audrey H Calderwood; John A Baron; Leila A Mott; Dennis J Ahnen; Roberd M Bostick; Jane C Figueiredo; Michael N Passarelli; Judy R Rees; Douglas J Robertson; Elizabeth L Barry
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2019-03-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.