Andrew C McClelland1,2, Roman Fleysher1,2, Weiya Mu1, Namhee Kim1,2, Michael L Lipton3,4. 1. The Gruss Magnetic Resonance Research Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA. 3. The Gruss Magnetic Resonance Research Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA. michael.lipton@einstein.yu.edu. 4. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA. michael.lipton@einstein.yu.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Assess the prevalence of white matter microstructural changes in combat veterans, within the context of a highly matched control group comprising unexposed close relatives. METHODS: This prospective study had institutional review board approval, included written informed consent, and is HIPAA-compliant. Diffusion tensor imaging was analyzed in 16 male blast-exposed combat veterans of Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation Enduring Freedom (mean age 31.0 years) and 18 unexposed males (mean age 30.4 years) chosen on the basis of a consanguineous relationship to a member of the subject group. Whole-brain voxel-based comparison of fractional anisotropy (FA) was performed using both group and individual analyses. Areas where effects on FA were detected were subsequently characterized by extracting radial diffusivity (RD), axial diffusivity (AD), and mean diffusivity (MD) from the regions of abnormal FA. RESULTS: Controls did not differ from veterans on any background demographic factor. In voxel-based group comparison, we identify high fractional anisotropy (FA) in veterans compared to controls (p < 0.01). Within individual veterans, we find multiple areas of both abnormally high and low FA (p < 0.01) in a heterogeneous distribution, consistent with multifocal traumatic axonal injury. In individualized analyses, low FA areas demonstrate high radial diffusivity, whereas high FA areas demonstrate low RD in both group and individual analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Combat-related blast exposure is associated with microstructural white matter abnormalities, and the nature of the control group decreases the likelihood that the findings reflect underlying background differences. Abnormalities are heterogeneously distributed across patients, consistent with TAI, and include areas of low and high FA.
PURPOSE: Assess the prevalence of white matter microstructural changes in combat veterans, within the context of a highly matched control group comprising unexposed close relatives. METHODS: This prospective study had institutional review board approval, included written informed consent, and is HIPAA-compliant. Diffusion tensor imaging was analyzed in 16 male blast-exposed combat veterans of Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation Enduring Freedom (mean age 31.0 years) and 18 unexposed males (mean age 30.4 years) chosen on the basis of a consanguineous relationship to a member of the subject group. Whole-brain voxel-based comparison of fractional anisotropy (FA) was performed using both group and individual analyses. Areas where effects on FA were detected were subsequently characterized by extracting radial diffusivity (RD), axial diffusivity (AD), and mean diffusivity (MD) from the regions of abnormal FA. RESULTS: Controls did not differ from veterans on any background demographic factor. In voxel-based group comparison, we identify high fractional anisotropy (FA) in veterans compared to controls (p < 0.01). Within individual veterans, we find multiple areas of both abnormally high and low FA (p < 0.01) in a heterogeneous distribution, consistent with multifocal traumatic axonal injury. In individualized analyses, low FA areas demonstrate high radial diffusivity, whereas high FA areas demonstrate low RD in both group and individual analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Combat-related blast exposure is associated with microstructural white matter abnormalities, and the nature of the control group decreases the likelihood that the findings reflect underlying background differences. Abnormalities are heterogeneously distributed across patients, consistent with TAI, and include areas of low and high FA.
Authors: Scott C Matthews; Irina A Strigo; Alan N Simmons; Ryan M O'Connell; Lindsay E Reinhardt; Suzanne A Moseley Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2010-05-06 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2004 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Michelle E Costanzo; Yi-Yu Chou; Suzanne Leaman; Dzung L Pham; David Keyser; Dominic E Nathan; Mary Coughlin; Paul Rapp; Michael J Roy Journal: Neurosci Lett Date: 2014-06-04 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Michael L Lipton; Namhee Kim; Young K Park; Miriam B Hulkower; Tova M Gardin; Keivan Shifteh; Mimi Kim; Molly E Zimmerman; Richard B Lipton; Craig A Branch Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 3.978
Authors: M Wintermark; L Coombs; T J Druzgal; A S Field; C G Filippi; R Hicks; R Horton; Y W Lui; M Law; P Mukherjee; A Norbash; G Riedy; P C Sanelli; J R Stone; G Sze; M Tilkin; C T Whitlow; E A Wilde; G York; J M Provenzale Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-02-05 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Heidi Terrio; Lisa A Brenner; Brian J Ivins; John M Cho; Katherine Helmick; Karen Schwab; Katherine Scally; Rick Bretthauer; Deborah Warden Journal: J Head Trauma Rehabil Date: 2009 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.710