Literature DB >> 30116839

Suitability of Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) as a Bioindicator for Environmental Pollution with Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluorooctanesulfonic Acid (PFOS).

J Kowalczyk1, J Numata2, B Zimmermann3, R Klinger3, F Habedank4, P Just5, H Schafft2, M Lahrssen-Wiederholt2.   

Abstract

Wildlife species, such as roe deer, moose, brown hare, wild boar, etc., are known to accumulate persistent environmental contaminants and thus are useful as bioindicators for environmental pollution. Wild boars become exposed to perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) from flora, fauna, water, and soil. The main exposure pathway to PFOA and PFOS is assumed to be the oral intake. From studies in domestic pigs (belonging to the same species Sus scrofa), it has been established that the oral exposure results in the liver accumulation of PFOA and PFOS. Thus, we posit that wild boars can be quantitatively used as suitable bioindicators for the presence of these substances in the environment. After the environmental pollution case in the Hessian region Sauerland in 2006, monitoring programs of individual Federal States from 2007 to 2013 showed that almost all wild boar liver samples contained PFOA and PFOS. In 2014, the analyses of PFOA and PFOS in liver of wild boars hunted in the south, north, and west of Germany showed liver concentrations at the same level among regions. Overall, an average ratio of PFOS:PFOA concentration in liver of 20.5:1 was found. To estimate the actual ratio of PFOS:PFOA in the wild boars' dietary exposure, we performed toxicokinetic modeling. According to the model, the PFOS exposure is only 2.2 times that of PFOA (because PFOS has slower elimination kinetics and higher affinity for the liver than PFOA). Overall, the determination of PFOA and PFOS in liver of wild boars indicates that both substances are ubiquitously distributed in the environment. At the same time, higher exposures were found for animals living in closer proximity to dense human populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30116839     DOI: 10.1007/s00244-018-0552-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol        ISSN: 0090-4341            Impact factor:   2.804


  3 in total

1.  Perfluoroalkyl substances in circum-ArcticRangifer: caribou and reindeer.

Authors:  Anna Maria Roos; Mary Gamberg; Derek Muir; Anna Kärrman; Pernilla Carlsson; Christine Cuyler; Ylva Lind; Rossana Bossi; Frank Rigét
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Standardised Sampling Approach for Investigating Pathogens or Environmental Chemicals in Wild Game at Community Hunts.

Authors:  Denny Maaz; Carl Gremse; Kaya C Stollberg; Claudia Jäckel; Smita Sutrave; Carolyn Kästner; Birsen Korkmaz; Martin H Richter; Niels Bandick; Julia Steinhoff-Wagner; Monika Lahrssen-Wiederholt; Anneluise Mader
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Cadmium and wild boar: Environmental exposure and immunological impact on macrophages.

Authors:  Giulia Franzoni; Valentina Ciccotelli; Lucia Masiello; Chiara Grazia De Ciucis; Antonio Giovanni Anfossi; Barbara Vivaldi; Mauro Ledda; Susanna Zinellu; Silvia Dei Giudici; Enrica Berio; Andreoli Tiziana; Monica Dellepiane; Simona Zoppi; Chiara Masotti; Maria Ines Crescio; Annalisa Oggiano; Carlo Ercolini; Elisabetta Razzuoli
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2022-01-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.