Literature DB >> 30116662

Challenging facial pigmented lesions: values and limits of confocal microscopy.

Marina Agozzino1, Teresa Russo1, Marco Ardigò2, Vincenzo Piccolo1, Massimo Mascolo3, Stefania Staibano3, Roberto Alfano4, Giuseppe Argenziano1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy; lentigo maligna; pigmented facial lesion; seborrheic keratosis

Year:  2018        PMID: 30116662      PMCID: PMC6092073          DOI: 10.5826/dpc.0803a08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dermatol Pract Concept        ISSN: 2160-9381


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

Pigmented facial lesions (PFL) may be difficult to diagnose clinically and dermoscopically. Nowadays, reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) offers the possibility to assess in vivo PFL, although in challenging cases histopathology remains mandatory [1,2]. Herein a series of 3 patients with ambiguous PFL are reported.

Discussion

Clinically, all lesions were flat and brownish in color (Figures 1A–1C), while dermoscopically they revealed brown-black thickened pseudonetwork, grayish color, and rhomboidal structures (Figures 1A and 1B). Only one also exhibited scattered milia-like cysts (Figure 1C).
Figure 1

Dermoscopic images. (A) Lesion A and (B) lesion B show a thickened pseudonetwork and gray color in the middle area. (C) Lesion C shows sharply demarcated borders, a milia-like cyst, and looped vessels. RCM mosaics. [Copyright: ©2018 Agozzino et al.]

RCM examination of the 3 lesions, performed using a Vivascope 1500 (Lucid, Rochester, NY, USA), showed elongated bright tubular cords with bulbous projections (lesion A, Figure 2A), keratinocyte disarray and atypical cell aggregates around adnexal structures (lesion B, Figure 2B), and dendritic cell infiltration of adnexal structures with numerous reflective atypical roundish cells at the dermoepidermal junction (lesion C, Figure 2C). Features seen in the second and third lesions were interpreted as suggestive of lentigo maligna (LM).
Figure 2

(A) The majority of lesion A displays elongated tubular structures (cords) and bulbous projections indicative of SK. (B) RCM images of lesion B show non-edged papillae with aggregates of atypical large nucleated cells around adnexal structures. In lesion C, the epidermis reveals (C) a disarrayed honeycomb pattern with multiple atypical reflective cells around follicular openings (red arrows) and keratin-filled invaginations in the upper left part of the image, (D) numerous cells with dendritic processes around follicles, and (E) melanophages inside dermal papillae. [Copyright: ©2018 Agozzino et al.]

Histopathology performed on excisional biopsies for all 3 lesions confirmed the diagnosis of an irritated, pigmented seborrheic keratosis (SK) of lesion A (Figure 3A); a diagnosis of melanoma in situ was made in lesion B (Figure 3B); and histopathologic features of lesion C were suggestive of an irritated SK and were partially in contrast with RCM findings (Figure 3D).
Figure 3

Histopathology. (A) Lesion A shows acanthosis, parakeratosis, and horn cysts (hematoxylin and eosin [H&E] staining, original magnification ×50). (B) Nested atypical melanocytes, pagetoid spread cells, and some perifollicular atypical melanocytes in lesion B (H&E staining, original magnification ×50). (C) Lesion C reveals horn cysts, subepidermal chronic inflammation, and melanin deposits (H&E staining, original magnification ×50). (D) Staining for S100 protein highlights only some melanocytes (S100 protein, original magnification ×50). [Copyright: ©2018 Agozzino et al.]

These examples underline how the diagnosis of flat PFL on chronically sun-damaged skin represents one of the most challenging scenarios for dermatologists treating skin cancer. In particular, facial LM and SK may show overlapping morphological features. Irritated or regressive SK is particularly challenging when it shows clinical (eg, irregular borders, presence of multiple colors, asymmetry) and dermoscopic features (such as focal or diffuse pink or gray hue) that overlap with those of facial melanoma. Moreover, the presence in lesion C of perifollicular inflammatory cells and Langerhans cells, resembling dendritic melanocytes in RCM, represents a possible RCM pitfall in the differentiation of PFL (Figure 2D). A detailed evaluation of the components of the folliculotropism in facial macules may help to improve the diagnostic accuracy of RCM findings [3]. The infiltration of the hair follicle was found to be indicative of LM/LMM compared to nonmelanocytic skin neoplasms, with an overall sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 83% [3]. A few bright dendrites in the epidermis, but not infiltrating the hair follicle predominantly, have estimated specificity for pigmented actinic keratosis (53%) [3]. Therefore, further studies of distribution and amount of cells, and the presence of bulging around the follicles, are necessary and could represent an important tool to help in differentiating PFL.

Conclusions

Nowadays, confocal examination provides increasingly useful information for the interpretation of doubtful facial lesions. However, histopathologic examination remains mandatory in special cases to avoid overtreatment.
  3 in total

1.  The impact of in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy on the diagnostic accuracy of lentigo maligna and equivocal pigmented and nonpigmented macules of the face.

Authors:  Pascale Guitera; Giovanni Pellacani; Kerry A Crotty; Richard A Scolyer; Ling-Xi L Li; Sara Bassoli; Marco Vinceti; Harold Rabinovitz; Caterina Longo; Scott W Menzies
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 8.551

Review 2.  Dermoscopy of Malignant Skin Tumours: What's New?

Authors:  Teresa Russo; Vincenzo Piccolo; Aimilios Lallas; Jason Giacomel; Elvira Moscarella; Roberto Alfano; Giuseppe Argenziano
Journal:  Dermatology       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 5.366

3.  Folliculotropism in pigmented facial macules: Differential diagnosis with reflectance confocal microscopy.

Authors:  Flavia Persechino; Nathalie De Carvalho; Silvana Ciardo; Barbara De Pace; Alice Casari; Johanna Chester; Shaniko Kaleci; Ignazio Stanganelli; Caterina Longo; Francesca Farnetani; Giovanni Pellacani
Journal:  Exp Dermatol       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 3.960

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.