Literature DB >> 30116576

Crystal structure of N-allyl-4-methyl-benzene-sulfonamide.

Zeel S Patel1, Amanda C Stevens1, Erin C Bookout1, Richard J Staples2, Shannon M Biros1, Felix N Ngassa1.   

Abstract

The title compound, C10H13NO2S, was synthesized by a nucleophilic substitution reaction between allyl amine and p-toluene-sulfonyl chloride. The sulfonate S-O bond lengths are 1.4282 (17) and 1.4353 (17) Å, and the C-N-S-C torsion angle involving the sulfonamide moiety is -61.0 (2)°. In the crystal, centrosymmetric dimers of the title compound are present via inter-molecular N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds between sulfonamide groups. These dimers are linked into ribbons along the c-axis direction through offset π-π inter-actions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aryl sulfonamide; crystal structure; hydrogen bond; offset π–π inter­action

Year:  2018        PMID: 30116576      PMCID: PMC6072992          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018010290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

The sulfonamide moiety has been widely studied and its application in drug design has been reported (Qadir et al., 2015 ▸; Rehman et al., 2017 ▸; Gul et al., 2018 ▸). Sulfa drugs, which incorporate the sulfonamide moiety, have found applications as anti­bacterial, anti­cancer, anti­fungal, anti-inflammatory, and anti­viral agents (Alaoui et al., 2017 ▸). The synthesis of sulfonamides generally relies on the use of sulfonyl chlorides as electrophilic partners that react with nucleophilic amines. According to the current state of knowledge in the field, the use of sulfonyl chlorides as electrophilic substrates in the synthesis of sulfonamides suffers from some drawbacks. One such drawback is the difficulty in handling and storage (Caddick et al., 2004 ▸). Other alternatives to sulfonyl chlorides have been reported (Parumala & Peddinti, 2016 ▸; Yang & Tian, 2017 ▸). Nucleophilic acyl substitution is the mechanism that describes the reaction between a carb­oxy­lic acid derivative such as acid chloride with an amine to form the corresponding amide. The mechanism of the reaction between sulfonyl chlorides and amines is analogous to nucleophilic acyl substitution, except that it occurs at the sulfonyl group and not the carbonyl group (Um et al., 2013 ▸). Recently, we have been particularly inter­ested in the structural motif of sulfonamide compounds that are known to modulate 5-HT6 receptor activity and are used for the treatment of CNS diseases and disorders (Blass, 2016 ▸). We are also inter­ested in the therapeutic application of sulfonamide mol­ecules used for chondrogenic differentiation (Choi et al., 2016 ▸), and for the treatment of cancer (Gul et al., 2018 ▸). Fig. 1 ▸ shows the structure of Sulefonur, which has been reported as a potent anti­cancer sulfonamide drug candidate and is under anti­cancer clinical trials (Gul et al., 2018 ▸). As part of our ongoing effort to synthesize small sulfonamide mol­ecules that mimic the structural motifs of known sulfonamide drug candidates, we synthesized the title compound, C10H13NO2S, (I) and determined its crystal structure from single crystal X-ray diffraction data.
Figure 1

The structure of Sulefonur.

Structural commentary

The mol­ecular structure of compound (I), which was solved in the triclinic space group P , is shown in Fig. 2 ▸. The S—O bond lengths of 1.4282 (17) and 1.4353 (17) Å and the O1—S1—O2 bond angle of 118.87 (11)° are typical for sulfonamide moieties. The S1—N1 bond length is 1.617 (2) Å, and the C1—N1—S1—C4 torsion angle is −61.0 (2)°.
Figure 2

The mol­ecular structure of the title compound, showing the atom labeling. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.

Supra­molecular features

Mol­ecules of the title compound are linked to one another via hydrogen bonds and π–π inter­actions. Centrosymmetric dimers of compound (I) are formed through inter­molecular hydrogen bonds between the sulfonamide N—H group and an O atom of a neighbouring sulfonamide group (Fig. 3 ▸). The N1⋯O2i distance of 2.900 (3) Å suggests inter­actions of medium strength with a nearly linear N—H⋯O hydrogen bond of 174 (3)° (Table 1 ▸). These dimers are then linked through offset π–π inter­actions into ribbons that lie along the c axis (Figs. 3 ▸, 4 ▸). The inter­centroid distance Cg⋯Cg ii is 3.8340 (17) Å, with a slippage of 1.320 Å and a plane-to-plane distance between phenyl rings of 3.600 Å [symmetry code (ii) = −x, −y, −z].
Figure 3

A depiction of the inter­molecular hydrogen bonds and offset π–π inter­actions present in the crystal, viewed down the a axis, using a ball and stick model with standard CPK colors. [Symmetry codes: (i) −x, −y, −z + 1; (ii) −x, −y, −z.]

Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1⋯O2i 0.83 (1)2.07 (1)2.900 (3)174 (3)

Symmetry code: (i) .

Figure 4

A view along the a axis of the title compound showing the supra­molecular ribbons assembled via N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds (blue, dashed lines) and π–π inter­actions (red, dotted lines).

Database survey

The Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version 5.39, February 2018; Groom et al., 2016 ▸) contains 17 structures of p-tolyl­sulfonamides where there is a –CH2—C=C group bonded to the sulfonamide-N atom. The alkene group in these structures is a part of, for example, furan rings (DERTIE and DERTOK, Hashmi et al., 2006 ▸), an allene (XUDNEP, Lan & Hammond, 2002 ▸), and various acyclic systems (BUXYUQ, Kiyokawa et al., 2015 ▸; KIHMIY, Lee et al., 2007 ▸). While all of the structures listed here display inter­molecular hydrogen bonds between sulfonamide groups, none of them display π–π inter­actions between the p-tolyl­sulfonamide rings as seen in the title compound.

Synthesis and crystallization

Allyl­amine (1.31 ml, 18 mmol) was added in 20 ml of degassed di­chloro­methane. This was followed by the addition of pyridine (1.42 ml, 18 mmol). The resulting solution was stirred under an atmosphere of N2, followed by the portion-wise addition of p-toluene­sulfonyl chloride (3.05 g, 16 mmol). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24 h. Reaction completion was verified by using TLC analysis. The mixture was acidified to pH 2–3 using concentrated HCl. After dilution with 20 ml of CH2Cl2, the organic phase was washed with H2O (3 × 20 ml) and the aqueous layer was back-extracted with CH2Cl2 (20 ml). The combined organic extracts were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. After solvent evaporation, the residue was obtained as a yellow solid which was recrystallized in cold ethanol to afford pale-yellow crystals (56%; m.p. 332–333 K).

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2 ▸. All hydrogen atoms bonded to carbon atoms were placed in calculated positions and refined as riding: Csp 3—H = 0.95–1.00 Å with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C) for methine and methyl­ene groups, and U iso(H) = 1.5U eq(C) for methyl groups. The hydrogen atom bonded to the nitro­gen atom (H1) was located using electron-density difference maps, and the N—H bond length was restrained to 0.84±0.01 Å using the DFIX command as executed in SHELXL (Sheldrick, 2015 ▸).
Table 2

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC10H13NO2S
M r 211.27
Crystal system, space groupTriclinic, P
Temperature (K)173
a, b, c (Å)7.5538 (10), 8.2591 (11), 9.7145 (13)
α, β, γ (°)85.9415 (16), 72.9167 (16), 67.6989 (15)
V3)535.42 (12)
Z 2
Radiation typeMo Kα
μ (mm−1)0.28
Crystal size (mm)0.28 × 0.25 × 0.20
 
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker APEXII CCD
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2014)
T min, T max 0.672, 0.745
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections6472, 1963, 1564
R int 0.036
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.604
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.053, 0.156, 1.09
No. of reflections1963
No. of parameters132
No. of restraints1
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.60, −0.26

Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2013 ▸), SHELXS (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸), SHELXL (Sheldrick, 2015 ▸), OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009 ▸; Bourhis et al., 2015 ▸) and CrystalMaker (Palmer, 2007 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018010290/wm5455sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018010290/wm5455Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018010290/wm5455Isup3.cml CCDC reference: 1856234 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C10H13NO2SZ = 2
Mr = 211.27F(000) = 224
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.310 Mg m3
a = 7.5538 (10) ÅMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
b = 8.2591 (11) ÅCell parameters from 2805 reflections
c = 9.7145 (13) Åθ = 2.2–25.3°
α = 85.9415 (16)°µ = 0.28 mm1
β = 72.9167 (16)°T = 173 K
γ = 67.6989 (15)°Chunk, pale yellow
V = 535.42 (12) Å30.28 × 0.25 × 0.20 mm
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer1564 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
φ and ω scansRint = 0.036
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2014)θmax = 25.4°, θmin = 2.2°
Tmin = 0.672, Tmax = 0.745h = −9→9
6472 measured reflectionsk = −9→9
1963 independent reflectionsl = −11→11
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: mixed
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.053H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.156w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0902P)2 + 0.112P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.09(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1963 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.60 e Å3
132 parametersΔρmin = −0.26 e Å3
1 restraint
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
S10.23035 (9)−0.06592 (8)0.28093 (6)0.0355 (3)
O10.4258 (2)−0.1649 (2)0.19086 (19)0.0423 (5)
O20.1100 (3)−0.1576 (2)0.36436 (18)0.0407 (5)
N10.2532 (3)0.0508 (3)0.3966 (2)0.0352 (5)
H10.153 (3)0.085 (4)0.468 (2)0.048 (8)*
C10.3608 (4)0.1687 (4)0.3441 (3)0.0436 (7)
H1A0.29230.25650.28300.052*
H1B0.49840.10060.28470.052*
C20.3677 (4)0.2590 (4)0.4684 (3)0.0483 (7)
H20.43230.18740.53390.058*
C30.2948 (6)0.4239 (5)0.4948 (4)0.0705 (10)
H3A0.22890.50050.43220.085*
H3B0.30630.47030.57700.085*
C40.0966 (3)0.0803 (3)0.1729 (3)0.0318 (6)
C5−0.1007 (4)0.1904 (3)0.2347 (3)0.0390 (6)
H5−0.16550.18270.33340.047*
C6−0.2011 (4)0.3105 (4)0.1516 (3)0.0424 (7)
H6−0.33630.38490.19370.051*
C7−0.1092 (4)0.3257 (3)0.0072 (3)0.0397 (6)
C80.0869 (4)0.2125 (4)−0.0528 (3)0.0423 (7)
H80.15090.2187−0.15200.051*
C90.1909 (4)0.0909 (4)0.0291 (3)0.0380 (6)
H90.32580.0156−0.01300.046*
C10−0.2180 (5)0.4608 (4)−0.0817 (3)0.0506 (7)
H10A−0.12120.4891−0.16140.076*
H10B−0.30760.5669−0.02120.076*
H10C−0.29640.4147−0.12050.076*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
S10.0316 (4)0.0323 (4)0.0372 (4)−0.0107 (3)−0.0031 (3)−0.0010 (3)
O10.0323 (10)0.0378 (10)0.0444 (10)−0.0067 (8)−0.0007 (8)−0.0047 (8)
O20.0425 (10)0.0322 (10)0.0428 (10)−0.0158 (9)−0.0034 (8)0.0010 (8)
N10.0325 (11)0.0363 (12)0.0333 (11)−0.0124 (10)−0.0049 (9)0.0010 (9)
C10.0464 (16)0.0444 (16)0.0430 (15)−0.0237 (13)−0.0087 (12)0.0036 (12)
C20.0484 (17)0.0476 (18)0.0550 (17)−0.0218 (14)−0.0196 (14)0.0063 (14)
C30.084 (3)0.056 (2)0.073 (2)−0.0282 (19)−0.020 (2)−0.0084 (18)
C40.0280 (12)0.0331 (13)0.0346 (13)−0.0140 (11)−0.0058 (10)−0.0009 (10)
C50.0337 (14)0.0439 (16)0.0344 (13)−0.0135 (12)−0.0032 (11)−0.0019 (12)
C60.0334 (14)0.0474 (17)0.0421 (15)−0.0113 (12)−0.0086 (12)−0.0027 (13)
C70.0431 (15)0.0423 (16)0.0433 (15)−0.0228 (13)−0.0173 (12)0.0013 (12)
C80.0415 (15)0.0546 (17)0.0312 (13)−0.0227 (14)−0.0045 (11)0.0008 (12)
C90.0339 (14)0.0442 (15)0.0337 (13)−0.0169 (12)−0.0022 (11)−0.0038 (11)
C100.0553 (18)0.0505 (18)0.0528 (17)−0.0216 (15)−0.0242 (14)0.0076 (14)
S1—O11.4282 (17)C4—C91.383 (3)
S1—O21.4353 (17)C5—H50.9500
S1—N11.617 (2)C5—C61.373 (4)
S1—C41.760 (3)C6—H60.9500
N1—H10.831 (10)C6—C71.390 (4)
N1—C11.468 (3)C7—C81.388 (3)
C1—H1A0.9900C7—C101.501 (4)
C1—H1B0.9900C8—H80.9500
C1—C21.487 (4)C8—C91.383 (4)
C2—H20.9500C9—H90.9500
C2—C31.273 (4)C10—H10A0.9800
C3—H3A0.9500C10—H10B0.9800
C3—H3B0.9500C10—H10C0.9800
C4—C51.390 (3)
O1—S1—O2118.87 (11)C9—C4—C5120.4 (2)
O1—S1—N1107.94 (11)C4—C5—H5120.3
O1—S1—C4108.08 (11)C6—C5—C4119.3 (2)
O2—S1—N1105.56 (11)C6—C5—H5120.3
O2—S1—C4108.64 (11)C5—C6—H6119.3
N1—S1—C4107.21 (11)C5—C6—C7121.5 (2)
S1—N1—H1112 (2)C7—C6—H6119.3
C1—N1—S1119.02 (17)C6—C7—C10121.1 (3)
C1—N1—H1118 (2)C8—C7—C6118.2 (2)
N1—C1—H1A109.7C8—C7—C10120.7 (2)
N1—C1—H1B109.7C7—C8—H8119.4
N1—C1—C2109.8 (2)C9—C8—C7121.2 (2)
H1A—C1—H1B108.2C9—C8—H8119.4
C2—C1—H1A109.7C4—C9—C8119.3 (2)
C2—C1—H1B109.7C4—C9—H9120.3
C1—C2—H2117.1C8—C9—H9120.3
C3—C2—C1125.7 (3)C7—C10—H10A109.5
C3—C2—H2117.1C7—C10—H10B109.5
C2—C3—H3A120.0C7—C10—H10C109.5
C2—C3—H3B120.0H10A—C10—H10B109.5
H3A—C3—H3B120.0H10A—C10—H10C109.5
C5—C4—S1119.60 (19)H10B—C10—H10C109.5
C9—C4—S1119.9 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1···O2i0.83 (1)2.07 (1)2.900 (3)174 (3)
  13 in total

1.  Sulfonamide Derivatives and Pharmaceutical Applications Thereof.

Authors:  Benjamin Blass
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 4.345

2.  Synthesis and anti-cancer activities of new sulfonamides 4-substituted-triazolyl nucleosides.

Authors:  Soukaina Alaoui; Maeva Dufies; Mohsine Driowya; Luc Demange; Khalid Bougrin; Guillaume Robert; Patrick Auberger; Gilles Pagès; Rachid Benhida
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Gold catalysis: phenol synthesis in the presence of functional groups.

Authors:  A Stephen K Hashmi; Jan P Weyrauch; Elzen Kurpejović; Tanja M Frost; Burkhard Miehlich; Wolfgang Frey; Jan W Bats
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 5.236

4.  Iodine-Catalyzed Decarboxylative Amidation of β,γ-Unsaturated Carboxylic Acids with Chloramine Salts Leading to Allylic Amides.

Authors:  Kensuke Kiyokawa; Takumi Kojima; Yusuke Hishikawa; Satoshi Minakata
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 5.236

5.  A kinetic study on nucleophilic displacement reactions of aryl benzenesulfonates with potassium ethoxide: role of K+ ion and reaction mechanism deduced from analyses of LFERs and activation parameters.

Authors:  Ik-Hwan Um; Ji-Sun Kang; Young-Hee Shin; Erwin Buncel
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 4.354

6.  Functionalization of monofluoroallene and the synthesis of aryl-substituted conjugated fluorodienes.

Authors:  Yunfeng Lan; Gerald B Hammond
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2002-07-11       Impact factor: 6.005

7.  Direct synthesis of sulfonamides and activated sulfonate esters from sulfonic acids.

Authors:  Stephen Caddick; Jonathan D Wilden; Duncan B Judd
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-02-04       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

9.  The anatomy of a comprehensive constrained, restrained refinement program for the modern computing environment - Olex2 dissected.

Authors:  Luc J Bourhis; Oleg V Dolomanov; Richard J Gildea; Judith A K Howard; Horst Puschmann
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A Found Adv       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.290

10.  The Cambridge Structural Database.

Authors:  Colin R Groom; Ian J Bruno; Matthew P Lightfoot; Suzanna C Ward
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2016-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.