Literature DB >> 30116569

Crystal structures of dimethyl 5-iodo-iso-phthal-ate and dimethyl 5-ethynyl-iso-phthal-ate.

Ines Hauptvogel1, Wilhelm Seichter1, Edwin Weber1.   

Abstract

In dimethyl 5-iodo-isophthalate, C10H9IO4, (I), the planes through the methyl carboxyl-ate moieties are tilted with respect to the benzene ring, whereas the mol-ecular framework of dimethyl 5-ethynylisophthalate, C12H10O4, (II), is perfectly planar. The crystal structure of (I) is stabilized by a three-dimensional supra-molecular network comprising C-H⋯O=C hydrogen bonds, as well as I⋯O=C inter-actions. In the crystal of (II), the mol-ecules are connected via C-Hethyn-yl⋯O=C hydrogen bonds to infinite strands. Moreover, π-π arene stacking inter-actions connect the mol-ecular chains into two-dimensional supra-molecular aggregates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  5-substituted dimethyl isophthalates; C—H⋯O and C—H⋯I hydrogen bonding; I⋯O=C inter­action; crystal structure; π–π stacking

Year:  2018        PMID: 30116569      PMCID: PMC6073011          DOI: 10.1107/S205698901800912X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

In recent years, the design of solid porous framework materials (MacGillivray, 2010 ▸; Furukawa et al., 2013 ▸; Eddaoudi et al., 2015 ▸) has become a very important topic in the field of supra­molecular crystal engineering (Desiraju et al., 2011 ▸). Associated with it, so-called linker mol­ecules featuring a geometrically rigid structure frequently being of linear, trigonal or tetra­hedral shape and having carb­oxy­lic acid functions as terminal groups play a key role in building such systems (Lin et al., 2006 ▸; Hausdorf et al., 2009 ▸; Zheng et al., 2010 ▸). In the course of the synthesis of the respective linkers, the title compounds (I) and (II), both being 5-substituted dimethyl isophthalates, are much used inter­mediates. However, these compounds are not only synthetically significant but also show inter­esting structures in the crystalline state, as demonstrated herein.

Structural commentary

The mol­ecular structures of the title compounds, (I) and (II), are illustrated in Fig. 1 ▸ a and 1b, respectively. Taking into account experimental error, the bond distances within the isophthalate framework agree well with those found in the crystal structure of dimethyl isophthalate (Gallagher, 2012 ▸). Compound (I) crystallizes in the ortho­rhom­bic space group Pna21 with one mol­ecule in the asymmetric unit. The mol­ecule adopts a twisted conformation with the mean planes defined by the methyl carboxyl­ate moieties inclined at angles of 12.6 (2) and 6.0 (2)° with respect to the plane of the benzene ring. Compound (II) crystallizes in the ortho­rhom­bic space group Pnma with the mol­ecule located on a symmetry plane, i.e. the mol­ecule is perfectly planar. However, the mol­ecule adopts approximate C 2 symmetry with the atoms C2, C5, C11 and C12 lying on a non-crystallographic bis­ecting symmetry plane.
Figure 1

Perspective view of the mol­ecular structures of the title compounds, (a) (I) and (b) (II), with atom labelling. Anisotropic displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 40% probability level.

Supra­molecular features

Infinite strands with the mol­ecules connected via I⋯O=C interactions [I1⋯O3—C9(x − , y + , z − 1; D⋯A = 3.129 (2) (Desiraju & Steiner, 1999 ▸) (Politzer et al. 2007 ▸; Desiraju et al., 2013 ▸), represent the basic supra­molecular aggregates of the crystal structure of (I). Association of the mol­ecular strands by C—H⋯O=C type hydrogen bonds (Table 1 ▸) (Desiraju & Steiner, 1999 ▸) and π–π stacking inter­actions [centroid–centroid distance = 4.149 (2) Å] (Tiekink & Zukerman-Schpector, 2012 ▸) generate a three-dimensional supra­molecular network (Fig. 2 ▸). In the crystal structure of (II), the mol­ecules are connected via Cethyn­yl—H⋯O=C bonds (Table 2 ▸) into infinite strands, which are further arranged into mol­ecular sheets that extend parallel to the ac plane (Fig. 3 ▸). Furthermore, π–π arene inter­actions with a centroid–centroid distance of 3.566 (1) Å and a slippage of 1.325 Å between the inter­acting aromatic rings stabilize the crystal structure along the stacking axis of the mol­ecular sheets.
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for (I)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C8—H8A⋯O1i 0.982.553.257 (4)129

Symmetry code: (i) .

Figure 2

Packing diagram of compound (I) viewed down the a axis. Dashed lines represent hydrogen-bonding inter­actions.

Table 2

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for (II)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C12—H12⋯O1i 0.942.293.223 (1)172

Symmetry code: (i) .

Figure 3

Packing excerpt of compound (II) viewed down the b axis. Dashed lines represent hydrogen-bonding inter­actions.

Database survey

The search in the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version 5.38, update May 2017; Groom et al., 2016 ▸) for meta-substituted derivatives of dimethyl isophthalate excluding their metal complexes, solvates and salts gave 18 hits. None of these compounds represents a 5-halogen- and 5-alkynyl-substituted dimethyl isophalate. The parent compound, dimethyl isophthalate (CSD refcode GOHRUS; Gallagher & Mocilac, 2012 ▸) crystallizes in space group Pna21 with two conformationally similar mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit. The independent mol­ecules participate in different ways in non-covalent bonding. One of them is involved in the formation of linear strands with the mol­ecules connected by C—Har­yl⋯O=C bonds. Inter­strand association is accomplished by π–π arene stacking. Mol­ecules related by the twofold screw axis are also linked via C—Har­yl⋯O=C bonding to form helical strands. In addition, these strands are stabilized by π–π stacking forces.

Synthesis and crystallization

Compounds (I) and (II) were synthesized following literature procedures. This involves a diazo­tization/iodination reaction of dimethyl 5-amino­isophthalate (Mazik & König, 2006 ▸) to give compound (I). Subsequent reaction of (I) with 2-methyl­but-3-yne-2-ol (MEBYNOL) using a Pd-catalysed Sonogashira coupling procedure (Doucet & Hierso, 2007 ▸; Rafael & Carmen, 2007 ▸) yielded the corresponding blocked acetyl­enic diester as an inter­mediate (Hauptvogel et al., 2011 ▸). Removal of the 2-hy­droxy­propyl blocking group was undertaken using sodium hydride in toluene and quenching with water to result in the title compound (II) (Havens & Hergenrother, 1985 ▸; Hauptvogel et al., 2011 ▸).

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3 ▸. Hydrogen atoms were positioned geometrically and refined using a riding model with C—H distances of 0.94–0.98 Å and U iso(H) = 1.5U eq(C-meth­yl) or U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C) for other H atoms.
Table 3

Experimental details

 (I)(II)
Crystal data
Chemical formulaC10H9IO4 C12H10O4
M r 320.07218.20
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, P n a21 Orthorhombic, P n m a
Temperature (K)143223
a, b, c (Å)7.7483 (2), 19.3451 (6), 7.2338 (2)10.1206 (5), 6.6219 (4), 16.3658 (8)
V3)1084.29 (5)1096.80 (10)
Z 44
Radiation typeMo KαMo Kα
μ (mm−1)2.940.10
Crystal size (mm)0.30 × 0.22 × 0.150.54 × 0.12 × 0.10
 
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker APEXII CCD area detectorBruker APEXII CCD area detector
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2008a )Multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2008a )
T min, T max 0.472, 0.6660.948, 0.990
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections22794, 2909, 280612397, 1292, 932
R int 0.0260.033
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.6840.638
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.015, 0.038, 1.050.039, 0.110, 1.03
No. of reflections29091292
No. of parameters13987
No. of restraints10
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrainedH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.47, −0.440.17, −0.18
Absolute structureFlack x determined using 1255 quotients [(I +)−(I )]/[(I +)+(I )] (Parsons et al., 2013)
Absolute structure parameter−0.004 (8)

Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2014 ▸), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a ▸), SHELXL2018 (Sheldrick, 2015b ▸), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012 ▸) and SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008b ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, II, global. DOI: 10.1107/S205698901800912X/zl2732sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S205698901800912X/zl2732Isup4.hkl Structure factors: contains datablock(s) II. DOI: 10.1107/S205698901800912X/zl2732IIsup5.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S205698901800912X/zl2732Isup4.cml Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S205698901800912X/zl2732IIsup5.cml CCDC references: 780476, 780475 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C10H9IO4Dx = 1.961 Mg m3
Mr = 320.07Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Orthorhombic, Pna21Cell parameters from 5755 reflections
a = 7.7483 (2) Åθ = 3.0–33.7°
b = 19.3451 (6) ŵ = 2.94 mm1
c = 7.2338 (2) ÅT = 143 K
V = 1084.29 (5) Å3Irregular, colourless
Z = 40.30 × 0.22 × 0.15 mm
F(000) = 616
Bruker APEXII CCD area detector diffractometer2806 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
φ and ω scansRint = 0.026
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2008a)θmax = 29.1°, θmin = 1.1°
Tmin = 0.472, Tmax = 0.666h = −10→10
22794 measured reflectionsk = −26→26
2909 independent reflectionsl = −9→9
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: fullH-atom parameters constrained
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.015w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.019P)2 + 0.3689P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.038(Δ/σ)max = 0.002
S = 1.05Δρmax = 0.47 e Å3
2909 reflectionsΔρmin = −0.44 e Å3
139 parametersAbsolute structure: Flack x determined using 1255 quotients [(I+)-(I-)]/[(I+)+(I-)] (Parsons et al., 2013)
1 restraintAbsolute structure parameter: −0.004 (8)
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refined as a 2-component twin.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
I10.81504 (2)0.66115 (2)0.83115 (6)0.02386 (5)
O10.5202 (3)0.54751 (11)0.1864 (3)0.0327 (5)
O20.3831 (3)0.63417 (11)0.0411 (3)0.0260 (4)
O30.4971 (3)0.87789 (10)0.2029 (3)0.0281 (5)
O40.6557 (3)0.89701 (11)0.4576 (3)0.0282 (5)
C10.5514 (4)0.66267 (12)0.2993 (4)0.0190 (8)
C20.5347 (3)0.73272 (14)0.2585 (4)0.0198 (5)
H20.4793690.7469650.1477200.024*
C30.5994 (3)0.78152 (14)0.3805 (3)0.0194 (5)
C40.6796 (3)0.76086 (15)0.5445 (4)0.0206 (5)
H40.7239310.7944390.6277700.025*
C50.6940 (3)0.69088 (15)0.5850 (4)0.0207 (5)
C60.6295 (4)0.64128 (15)0.4637 (4)0.0209 (5)
H60.6384850.5935020.4924780.025*
C70.4856 (4)0.60819 (14)0.1721 (4)0.0223 (5)
C80.3221 (5)0.58545 (18)−0.0951 (5)0.0330 (7)
H8A0.4185440.571014−0.1738230.049*
H8B0.2329320.607288−0.1713410.049*
H8C0.2735090.544937−0.0325930.049*
C90.5768 (3)0.85636 (11)0.3323 (8)0.0214 (4)
C100.6363 (5)0.97101 (16)0.4293 (5)0.0338 (7)
H10A0.6888030.9840360.3110340.051*
H10B0.6937160.9959470.5298960.051*
H10C0.5133960.9829190.4278000.051*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
I10.02804 (8)0.02336 (8)0.02019 (8)−0.00006 (6)−0.00121 (12)0.00381 (11)
O10.0500 (14)0.0174 (10)0.0308 (12)0.0032 (9)−0.0060 (10)−0.0006 (9)
O20.0300 (11)0.0187 (10)0.0293 (11)0.0017 (8)−0.0066 (9)−0.0048 (8)
O30.0347 (12)0.0194 (10)0.0301 (11)0.0027 (9)−0.0082 (9)0.0019 (8)
O40.0382 (12)0.0165 (9)0.0299 (11)−0.0011 (8)−0.0073 (9)−0.0004 (9)
C10.0216 (11)0.0183 (10)0.017 (2)0.0009 (9)0.0020 (10)−0.0004 (9)
C20.0196 (12)0.0190 (12)0.0209 (11)0.0022 (10)0.0042 (10)0.0019 (10)
C30.0191 (11)0.0183 (11)0.0208 (13)0.0013 (9)0.0025 (9)0.0012 (8)
C40.0217 (13)0.0191 (13)0.0211 (12)−0.0014 (10)0.0017 (10)−0.0012 (10)
C50.0224 (13)0.0217 (13)0.0181 (12)0.0022 (10)0.0023 (10)0.0017 (10)
C60.0242 (13)0.0183 (12)0.0201 (12)0.0016 (10)0.0024 (11)0.0013 (10)
C70.0256 (13)0.0197 (12)0.0217 (13)−0.0011 (10)0.0035 (11)−0.0011 (10)
C80.0409 (19)0.0257 (15)0.0323 (15)0.0005 (13)−0.0088 (13)−0.0075 (13)
C90.0218 (10)0.0173 (9)0.0250 (10)−0.0001 (8)0.0096 (18)−0.002 (2)
C100.0453 (19)0.0174 (14)0.0387 (19)0.0014 (13)−0.0064 (15)−0.0021 (12)
I1—C52.093 (3)C3—C41.398 (4)
O1—C71.209 (3)C3—C91.499 (4)
O2—C71.335 (4)C4—C51.390 (4)
O2—C81.443 (4)C4—H40.9500
O3—C91.196 (5)C5—C61.393 (4)
O4—C91.347 (5)C6—H60.9500
O4—C101.454 (4)C8—H8A0.9800
C1—C21.393 (3)C8—H8B0.9800
C1—C61.398 (4)C8—H8C0.9800
C1—C71.489 (4)C10—H10A0.9800
C2—C31.386 (4)C10—H10B0.9800
C2—H20.9500C10—H10C0.9800
C7—O2—C8115.7 (2)C1—C6—H6120.4
C9—O4—C10115.7 (3)O1—C7—O2124.0 (3)
C2—C1—C6120.5 (3)O1—C7—C1124.0 (3)
C2—C1—C7121.8 (3)O2—C7—C1112.1 (2)
C6—C1—C7117.7 (2)O2—C8—H8A109.5
C3—C2—C1119.7 (3)O2—C8—H8B109.5
C3—C2—H2120.2H8A—C8—H8B109.5
C1—C2—H2120.2O2—C8—H8C109.5
C2—C3—C4120.4 (3)H8A—C8—H8C109.5
C2—C3—C9117.9 (3)H8B—C8—H8C109.5
C4—C3—C9121.7 (3)O3—C9—O4123.9 (2)
C5—C4—C3119.5 (3)O3—C9—C3125.3 (3)
C5—C4—H4120.2O4—C9—C3110.7 (3)
C3—C4—H4120.2O4—C10—H10A109.5
C4—C5—C6120.6 (3)O4—C10—H10B109.5
C4—C5—I1118.9 (2)H10A—C10—H10B109.5
C6—C5—I1120.5 (2)O4—C10—H10C109.5
C5—C6—C1119.2 (3)H10A—C10—H10C109.5
C5—C6—H6120.4H10B—C10—H10C109.5
C6—C1—C2—C31.3 (4)C8—O2—C7—O1−4.1 (4)
C7—C1—C2—C3−179.4 (2)C8—O2—C7—C1176.3 (3)
C1—C2—C3—C4−0.6 (4)C2—C1—C7—O1168.0 (3)
C1—C2—C3—C9−179.3 (3)C6—C1—C7—O1−12.7 (4)
C2—C3—C4—C5−0.1 (4)C2—C1—C7—O2−12.5 (4)
C9—C3—C4—C5178.5 (3)C6—C1—C7—O2166.8 (3)
C3—C4—C5—C60.1 (4)C10—O4—C9—O31.1 (5)
C3—C4—C5—I1179.86 (19)C10—O4—C9—C3−177.5 (3)
C4—C5—C6—C10.7 (4)C2—C3—C9—O35.3 (5)
I1—C5—C6—C1−179.1 (2)C4—C3—C9—O3−173.3 (3)
C2—C1—C6—C5−1.3 (4)C2—C3—C9—O4−176.1 (3)
C7—C1—C6—C5179.4 (2)C4—C3—C9—O45.3 (4)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C8—H8A···O1i0.982.553.257 (4)129
C12H10O4Dx = 1.321 Mg m3
Mr = 218.20Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Orthorhombic, PnmaCell parameters from 2950 reflections
a = 10.1206 (5) Åθ = 2.4–23.1°
b = 6.6219 (4) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
c = 16.3658 (8) ÅT = 223 K
V = 1096.80 (10) Å3Column, colourless
Z = 40.54 × 0.12 × 0.10 mm
F(000) = 456
Bruker APEXII CCD area detector diffractometer932 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
φ and ω scansRint = 0.033
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2008a)θmax = 27.0°, θmin = 2.5°
Tmin = 0.948, Tmax = 0.990h = −12→12
12397 measured reflectionsk = −8→5
1292 independent reflectionsl = −20→19
Refinement on F20 restraints
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.039H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.110w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0486P)2 + 0.2932P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.03(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1292 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.17 e Å3
87 parametersΔρmin = −0.18 e Å3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
O11.25864 (13)0.25000.40733 (10)0.0552 (4)
O21.08848 (14)0.25000.32081 (9)0.0519 (4)
O31.15356 (16)0.25000.70802 (10)0.0759 (6)
O40.94247 (15)0.25000.74402 (9)0.0617 (5)
C10.98919 (18)0.25000.60451 (11)0.0339 (4)
C21.08100 (18)0.25000.54143 (12)0.0350 (4)
H21.17180.25000.55360.042*
C31.03958 (18)0.25000.46063 (12)0.0339 (4)
C40.90505 (19)0.25000.44325 (12)0.0361 (4)
H40.87670.25000.38860.043*
C50.81192 (17)0.25000.50582 (12)0.0348 (4)
C60.85496 (18)0.25000.58682 (12)0.0340 (4)
H60.79290.25000.62960.041*
C71.0392 (2)0.25000.68995 (13)0.0428 (5)
C80.9818 (3)0.25000.82935 (14)0.0791 (9)
H8A1.02030.12020.84310.119*0.5
H8B0.90500.27400.86340.119*0.5
H8C1.04650.35580.83850.119*0.5
C91.14180.25000.39490.039
C101.18130.25000.25300.067
H10A1.13530.21490.20300.101*0.5
H10B1.25050.15190.26330.101*0.5
H10C1.22020.38320.24740.101*0.5
C110.67260 (19)0.25000.48649 (12)0.0406 (5)
C120.5604 (2)0.25000.47022 (14)0.0532 (6)
H120.47000.25000.45710.064*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0293 (8)0.0828 (11)0.0536 (10)0.0000.0049 (7)0.000
O20.0409 (9)0.0783 (11)0.0364 (8)0.0000.0066 (7)0.000
O30.0329 (9)0.1475 (18)0.0473 (10)0.000−0.0079 (8)0.000
O40.0362 (9)0.1153 (14)0.0336 (8)0.000−0.0026 (7)0.000
C10.0294 (10)0.0371 (10)0.0352 (11)0.000−0.0006 (8)0.000
C20.0257 (9)0.0385 (10)0.0408 (11)0.000−0.0029 (8)0.000
C30.0295 (10)0.0338 (9)0.0385 (11)0.0000.0023 (8)0.000
C40.0343 (11)0.0404 (10)0.0334 (10)0.000−0.0020 (9)0.000
C50.0275 (9)0.0379 (10)0.0389 (11)0.000−0.0002 (8)0.000
C60.0276 (9)0.0398 (10)0.0347 (11)0.0000.0011 (8)0.000
C70.0299 (11)0.0568 (12)0.0416 (12)0.000−0.0013 (9)0.000
C80.0550 (16)0.151 (3)0.0315 (13)0.000−0.0049 (12)0.000
C90.0340.0430.0390.0000.0030.000
C100.0630.0980.0410.0000.0180.000
C110.0341 (11)0.0558 (12)0.0319 (10)0.0000.0003 (9)0.000
C120.0340 (12)0.0849 (17)0.0409 (13)0.000−0.0041 (10)0.000
O1—C91.1998 (14)C4—C51.392 (3)
O2—C91.3272 (15)C4—H40.9400
O2—C101.4544 (14)C5—C61.395 (3)
O3—C71.195 (3)C5—C111.445 (3)
O4—C71.319 (3)C6—H60.9400
O4—C81.452 (3)C8—H8A0.9700
C1—C21.389 (3)C8—H8B0.9700
C1—C61.389 (3)C8—H8C0.9700
C1—C71.487 (3)C10—H10A0.9700
C2—C31.387 (3)C10—H10B0.9700
C2—H20.9400C10—H10C0.9700
C3—C41.391 (3)C11—C121.166 (3)
C3—C91.4925 (18)C12—H120.9400
C9—O2—C10115.75 (10)O3—C7—O4123.6 (2)
C7—O4—C8116.19 (18)O3—C7—C1124.21 (19)
C2—C1—C6119.96 (18)O4—C7—C1112.23 (17)
C2—C1—C7118.13 (17)O4—C8—H8A109.5
C6—C1—C7121.91 (17)O4—C8—H8B109.5
C3—C2—C1120.42 (17)H8A—C8—H8B109.5
C3—C2—H2119.8O4—C8—H8C109.5
C1—C2—H2119.8H8A—C8—H8C109.5
C2—C3—C4119.39 (18)H8B—C8—H8C109.5
C2—C3—C9118.53 (15)O1—C9—O2123.76 (10)
C4—C3—C9122.09 (16)O1—C9—C3124.12 (11)
C3—C4—C5120.83 (18)O2—C9—C3112.12 (9)
C3—C4—H4119.6O2—C10—H10A109.5
C5—C4—H4119.6O2—C10—H10B109.5
C4—C5—C6119.18 (17)H10A—C10—H10B109.5
C4—C5—C11119.98 (18)O2—C10—H10C109.5
C6—C5—C11120.84 (17)H10A—C10—H10C109.5
C1—C6—C5120.21 (17)H10B—C10—H10C109.5
C1—C6—H6119.9C12—C11—C5179.5 (2)
C5—C6—H6119.9C11—C12—H12180.0
C6—C1—C2—C30.000 (1)C8—O4—C7—O30.000 (1)
C7—C1—C2—C3180.000 (1)C8—O4—C7—C1180.000 (1)
C1—C2—C3—C40.000 (1)C2—C1—C7—O30.000 (1)
C1—C2—C3—C9180.000 (1)C6—C1—C7—O3180.000 (1)
C2—C3—C4—C50.000 (1)C2—C1—C7—O4180.000 (1)
C9—C3—C4—C5180.000 (1)C6—C1—C7—O40.000 (1)
C3—C4—C5—C60.000 (1)C10—O2—C9—O10.000 (1)
C3—C4—C5—C11180.000 (1)C10—O2—C9—C3180.000 (1)
C2—C1—C6—C50.000 (1)C2—C3—C9—O10.000 (1)
C7—C1—C6—C5180.000 (1)C4—C3—C9—O1180.000 (1)
C4—C5—C6—C10.000 (1)C2—C3—C9—O2180.000 (1)
C11—C5—C6—C1180.000 (1)C4—C3—C9—O20.000 (1)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C12—H12···O1i0.942.293.223 (1)172
  13 in total

1.  High H2 adsorption by coordination-framework materials.

Authors:  Xiang Lin; Junhua Jia; Xuebo Zhao; K Mark Thomas; Alexander J Blake; Gavin S Walker; Neil R Champness; Peter Hubberstey; Martin Schröder
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  The Sonogashira reaction: a booming methodology in synthetic organic chemistry.

Authors:  Rafael Chinchilla; Carmen Najera
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2007-02-17       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  The chemistry and applications of metal-organic frameworks.

Authors:  Hiroyasu Furukawa; Kyle E Cordova; Michael O'Keeffe; Omar M Yaghi
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Recognition properties of an acyclic biphenyl-based receptor toward carbohydrates.

Authors:  Monika Mazik; Alexander König
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 4.354

Review 5.  Palladium-based catalytic systems for the synthesis of conjugated enynes by sonogashira reactions and related alkynylations.

Authors:  Henri Doucet; Jean-Cyrille Hierso
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 15.336

6.  Large pores generated by the combination of different inorganic units in a zinc hydroxide ethynylene diisophthalate MOF.

Authors:  Steffen Hausdorf; Wilhelm Seichter; Edwin Weber; Florian O R L Mertens
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 4.390

7.  SHELXT - integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A Found Adv       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.290

8.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

9.  Use of intensity quotients and differences in absolute structure refinement.

Authors:  Simon Parsons; Howard D Flack; Trixie Wagner
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2013-05-17

10.  The Cambridge Structural Database.

Authors:  Colin R Groom; Ian J Bruno; Matthew P Lightfoot; Suzanna C Ward
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2016-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.