| Literature DB >> 30115957 |
Wei Zhang1,2, Jun Li3, Zu-Bing Li1,4, Zhi Li5,6.
Abstract
Patients' postoperative facial swelling following third molars extraction may have both biological impacts and social impacts. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of artificial neural networks in the prediction of the postoperative facial swelling following the impacted mandibular third molars extraction. The improved conjugate grads BP algorithm combining with adaptive BP algorithm and conjugate gradient BP algorithm together was used. In this neural networks model, the functional projective relationship was established among patient's personal factors, anatomy factors of third molars and factors of surgical procedure to facial swelling following impacted mandibular third molars extraction. This neural networks model was trained and tested based on the data from 400 patients, in which 300 patients were made as the training samples, and another100 patients were assigned as the test samples. The improved conjugate grads BP algorithm was able to not only avoid the problem of local minimum effectively, but also improve the networks training speed greatly. 5-fold cross-validation was used to get a better sense of the predictive accuracy of the neural network and early stopping was used to improve generalization. The accuracy of this model was 98.00% for the prediction of facial swelling following impacted mandibular third molars extraction. This artificial intelligence model is approved as an accurate method for prediction of the facial swelling following impacted mandibular third molars extraction.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30115957 PMCID: PMC6095904 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-29934-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Normalization of the parameters data.
| Parameters | Normalization |
|---|---|
| X1: Gender | Male: 0.5; Female: 1 |
| X2: Age | ≤20: 0.5; 20–30: 0.25; 30–40: 0.5; ≥40: 1 |
| X3: Physique | Strong: 0; Middle: 0.5; Slim: 1 |
| X4: Oral hygiene | Good: 0; Middle: 0.5; Bad: 1 |
| X5: Relation of the wisdom teeth to the mandible ramus and second molar | Type I : 0; Type II: 0.5; Type III: 1 |
| X6: Relative depth of the wisdom teeth in bone | High: 0; Middle: 0.5; Low: 1 |
| X7: Relationship of the long axis of the wisdom teeth in relation to the long axis of the second molar | Vertical: 0; Buccalclination/Lingualclination: 0.25; Mesialclination/Distalclination: 0.50; Horizontal: 0.75; Invertion: 1 |
| X8: Relation of the wisdom teeth in mandibular dental arch | Lingual displacement: 0.25; Normotopia: 0.5; Buccal displacement: 1 |
| X9: Number of root | 1: 0; 2: 0.5; ≥3: 1 |
| X10: Type of incision | No incision: 0; Buccal incision: 0.5; Distal incision: 0.5; Buccal incision + Distal incision: 1 |
| X11: Location and quantity of bone removal | No: 0; Buccal/Distal/Occlusal: 0.5; Buccal + Distal/Buccal + Occlusal/Distal + Occlusa: 0.75; Buccal + Distal + Occlusal: 1 |
| X12: Section into pieces or not | no section: 0; section into 2 pieces: 0.5; section into 3 or more pieces: 1 |
| X13: Root fracture condition | No: 0; 1 root fracture: 0.25; 2 roots fracture: 0.5; ≥3 roots fracture: 1 |
| X14: Fracture of lingual bone plate or not | No: 0; Yes: 1 |
| X15: Surgical time | ≤10 minutes: 0; 10–20 minutes: 0.5; ≥20 minutes: 1 |
Figure 1The architecture of the neural networks model.
Figure 2(A–D) The different networks training epochs under four different judging value of extreme point (A: 0.1; B: 0.01; C: 0.001; D: 0.0001.).
Judging value of extreme point has influence on networks training speed.
| Judging values of extreme point | > 0.1 | 0.01 | 0.001 | 0.0001 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Training epochs | overflow | 1616 | 13 | 3764 |
Figure 3The test performance of the training network in 5-fold cross-validation.
Figure 4The confusion matrix of the dataset.
Figure 5The error vs. epoch for the training, validation, and test performances of the training record.
Figure 6The error histogram.
Results of prediction test.
| The output values of the network | < 0.4 (mild or no swelling) | 0.4–0.6 (moderate swelling) | > 0.6 (severe swelling) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The number of the reality | 35 | 47 | 16 | 98 |
| The number of correct prediction | 33 | 46 | 15 | 94 |