Literature DB >> 30115532

How long are burn patients really NPO in the perioperative period and can we effectively correct the caloric deficit using an enteral feeding "Catch-up" protocol?

C H Pham1, Z J Collier2, A B Webb3, W L Garner4, T J Gillenwater5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: "NPO at midnight" is a standard preoperative practice intended to reduce aspiration risk but can result in prolonged feeding interruptions in critically ill burn patients. Postoperative hyperalimentation in the form of a "catch-up" tube feeding protocol is routine. A retrospective review of our perioperative fasting practices and "catch-up" enteral feeding protocols was performed.
METHODS: Patients admitted to the Burn ICU from July 1st, 2015 to August 31st, 2016 were reviewed. Patients who had a protected airway in place, prescribed enteral nutrition, and underwent surgery were included. The time from NPO to surgical start (NPO-SS), NPO to feeding restart (NPO-FR), and calories received/prescribed were quantified. The efficacy of a postoperative catch-up feeding protocol was analyzed.
RESULTS: There were 41 patients that fit inclusion criteria with some undergoing multiple surgeries, yielding 109 surgeries/discrete perioperative events. The average total body surface area burn (38.1±23.6%), age (38.8±20.1years), ICU days (45.0±37.3 days), and ventilator days (35.1±33.8 days) were calculated. Average fasting durations of NPO-SS and NPO-FR were 9.3±3.1 and 14.2±4.1h, respectively. The average caloric deficit to prescribed calories ratio during the NPO-SS and NPO-FR periods were 1154±629/3534±851kcal and 1765±928/3534±851kcal, respectively. A post-operative catch-up protocol completely compensated for perioperative caloric deficits 68.8% (22/32) of the time.
CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill burn patients, a preoperative fast resulted in an average loss of greater than 50% of prescribed calories on the day of surgery. Clinicians should re-evaluate the standard practice of making preoperative patients "NPO at midnight". An effective catch-up protocol can adequately reduce caloric deficits.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Burns; Critical care; Enteral nutrition; Thermal injuries; Tube feeding

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30115532     DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Burns        ISSN: 0305-4179            Impact factor:   2.744


  3 in total

1.  Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Intraoperative Enteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Burn Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christopher H Pham; Mike Fang; Sebastian Q Vrouwe; Catherine M Kuza; Haig A Yenikomshian; Justin Gillenwater
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 1.845

2.  Interrupted Nutrition Support in Patients With Burn Injuries: A Single-Centre Observational Study.

Authors:  Nancy Coutris; Justin P Gawaziuk; Nora Cristall; Sarvesh Logsetty
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 0.947

3.  Fasting for anaesthesia: Less is more!

Authors:  Elizabeth M Elliott; Rebecca S Isserman; Paul Stricker; Sandhya Yaddanapudi; Rajeev Subramanyam
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2020-02-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.