Jae Keun Chung1, Jae Min Wi1, Kwan Bok Lee1, Byung Heon Ahn1, Young Hoon Hwang1, Mijin Kim1, Jong Jin Jung1, Young Cheol Yoo2. 1. From the Department of Ophthalmology, Konyang University, Kim's Eye Hospital, Myung-Gok Eye Research Institute, Seoul, South Korea. 2. From the Department of Ophthalmology, Konyang University, Kim's Eye Hospital, Myung-Gok Eye Research Institute, Seoul, South Korea. Electronic address: demian7435@gmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare long-term postoperative refractive outcomes between phacotrabeculectomy and phacoemulsification, both with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Konyang University, Kim's Eye Hospital, Myung-Gok Eye Research Institute, Seoul, South Korea. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. METHODS: Postoperative refractive outcomes were compared between patients with cataract and coexisting primary or secondary open-angle glaucoma (OAG) who had phacotrabeculectomy (combined group) and patients with cataract with or without coexisting OAG who had phacoemulsification alone (phaco-only group). The refractive prediction error, mean absolute error, and median absolute error were compared between groups. Subgroup analysis based on preoperative axial length (AL) was performed (medium >22.0 to <24.5 mm; medium-long ≥24.5 to <26.0 mm; long ≥26.0 mm). RESULTS: The combined group comprised 51 eyes and the phaco-only group, 74 eyes. The mean interval between surgery and refraction measurement was 14.70 months ± 10.80 (SD) (median 13.0 months) and 4.81 ± 4.97 months (median 2.0 months), respectively. Postoperatively, there was no statistically significant between-group difference in the following mean values: refractive prediction error, -0.05 ± 0.64 versus -0.04 ± 0.52 (P = .905); mean absolute error, 0.46 ± 0.44 versus 0.38 ± 0.36 (P = .258); median absolute error, 0.32 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.17, 0.67) versus 0.28 (IQR, 0.13, 0.54) (P = .297). Subgroup analysis also did not show significant differences between the 2 groups (all P > .05). CONCLUSION: The long-term postoperative refractive outcomes of phacotrabeculectomy and phacoemulsification alone were not significantly different in eyes with OAG, regardless of preoperative AL.
PURPOSE: To compare long-term postoperative refractive outcomes between phacotrabeculectomy and phacoemulsification, both with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Konyang University, Kim's Eye Hospital, Myung-Gok Eye Research Institute, Seoul, South Korea. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. METHODS: Postoperative refractive outcomes were compared between patients with cataract and coexisting primary or secondary open-angle glaucoma (OAG) who had phacotrabeculectomy (combined group) and patients with cataract with or without coexisting OAG who had phacoemulsification alone (phaco-only group). The refractive prediction error, mean absolute error, and median absolute error were compared between groups. Subgroup analysis based on preoperative axial length (AL) was performed (medium >22.0 to <24.5 mm; medium-long ≥24.5 to <26.0 mm; long ≥26.0 mm). RESULTS: The combined group comprised 51 eyes and the phaco-only group, 74 eyes. The mean interval between surgery and refraction measurement was 14.70 months ± 10.80 (SD) (median 13.0 months) and 4.81 ± 4.97 months (median 2.0 months), respectively. Postoperatively, there was no statistically significant between-group difference in the following mean values: refractive prediction error, -0.05 ± 0.64 versus -0.04 ± 0.52 (P = .905); mean absolute error, 0.46 ± 0.44 versus 0.38 ± 0.36 (P = .258); median absolute error, 0.32 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.17, 0.67) versus 0.28 (IQR, 0.13, 0.54) (P = .297). Subgroup analysis also did not show significant differences between the 2 groups (all P > .05). CONCLUSION: The long-term postoperative refractive outcomes of phacotrabeculectomy and phacoemulsification alone were not significantly different in eyes with OAG, regardless of preoperative AL.