| Literature DB >> 30115045 |
Teklehaymanot Huluf Abraha1, Berhe Beyene Gebrezgiabher2, Berihu Gidey Aregawi3, Desta Siyoum Belay4, Lidiya Tsegay Tikue5, Getachew Mebrahtu Welay2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Postpartum family planning services is one of the recommended public health intervention aimed at reducing maternal and child morbidity and mortalities. However, there is a paucity studies in rural Tigray region. Therefore, determining the level and associated factors of contraceptive use among postpartum women has the potential to contribute in achieving the Ethiopian Health Sector Transformation Plan and to the Sustainable Development Goals on maternal and infant survival.Entities:
Keywords: Contraception; Ethiopia; Multilevel analysis; Postpartum period; Predictors; Tigray
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30115045 PMCID: PMC6097291 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5941-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Description and measurement of variables included in the mixed effect multilevel model, rural Tigray region, Ethiopia 2017
| Variables | Description and measurements |
|---|---|
| Outcome variable | |
| Postpartum contraceptive use | This is defined as a women’s use of any modern method of contraception during the 12 months following their most recent childbirth. The outcome variable categorized as yes response is coded’1′ and no as ‘0′. |
| Individual-level variables | Level 1- determinant variables |
| Marital status | Marital status of respondent [currently married and un married]. |
| Maternal age | Self reported age of respondent at the time of the survey [15–49 years]. |
| Maternal and husband educational-level | Highest level of education level [None/Primary; Secondary or higher]. |
| Birth order | Birth order of women’s most recent birth [index birth]. It is divided in to three categories: first and second birth, 3rd– 4th and ≥ 5th. |
| Birth interval | Birth interval is the length of time between two successive live births. It is divided in to three: < 24 months, 24–36 months and > 36 months. |
| Parity | Number of children ever given birth [None; One or more]. |
| Wealth index | This is computed by principal component analyses from ten variables (based on the ownership of a farmland, own toilet facility, bank account, mobile phone, electricity, corrugated iron sheet roof, number of cows/oxen, horses/mules/donkeys, goats/sheep and chicken). The wealth index is categorized in to five groups and ranked from poorest (first) to wealthiest (fifth) quintile. |
| ANC use | Proportion of women who have received ANC at least one and above visit either at health center, hospital or health post. |
| Place of delivery | Proportion of women who have given birth at either at health center, hospital or health post. |
| PNC use | Proportion of women who have postnatal care at least one visit either at health center, hospital or health post. |
| Received FP counseling during prenatal | Any study participants who received family planning (FP) counseling during prenatal, yes ‘responses are coded as ‘1′ and no response as ‘0′. |
| History of complication during delivery | An individual study participants who have severe pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, bleeding during intra partum, abnormal presentation of the fetus, prolonged labour, obstructed labour, breech delivery, and cervical tear, if the study participants experienced at least any one of the above, it is categorized as 1(yes), if not 0 (no). |
| Model household | A household that applied all health extension packages at their home and got certificates of appreciations from health extension workers. Yes ‘responses are coded as ‘1′ and no response as ‘0′. |
| Community-level variables | Level 2-determinant variables |
| District -level of ANC use | Proportion of women in the district received 4+ANC and above visit. It is categorized in to two: high and low-level. |
| Source of income | The cluster’s population main source of income. It is categorized in to two: farming and mixed (farming & trading). |
| Distance | Distance in kilometer of villages in each cluster to the nearest health facility. It is categorized in-to three: < 1 km, 1–5 km and > 5 km. |
| District residence | Current district residence [ |
Socio-demographic characteristics in rural Tigray region, northern Ethiopia, August 2017(n = 1109)
| Variables | Frequency ( | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Maternal age (years) | ||
| 16–19 | 52 | 4.7 |
| 20–24 | 278 | 25.1 |
| 25–29 | 302 | 27.2 |
| 30–34 | 228 | 20.6 |
| 35–39 | 182 | 16.4 |
| > =40 | 67 | 6.0 |
| Maternal education | ||
| Not educated | 462 | 41.7 |
| Primary school | 473 | 42.7 |
| Secondary school | 162 | 14.6 |
| Diploma and above | 12 | 1.1 |
| Partner/husband education | ||
| Not educated | 364 | 32.8 |
| Primary school | 541 | 48.8 |
| Secondary school | 176 | 15.9 |
| Diploma and above | 28 | 2.5 |
| Marital status | ||
| Currently married | 1047 | 94.4 |
| Not currently married | 62 | 5.6 |
| Maternal occupation | ||
| House wife | 126 | 11.4 |
| Farmer | 900 | 81.2 |
| Othersa | 83 | 7.5 |
| Husband/partner occupation | ||
| Farmer | 955 | 86.1 |
| Private worker | 62 | 5.6 |
| Othersa | 92 | 8.3 |
| Wealth index | ||
| Lowest | 220 | 19.8 |
| Second | 227 | 20.5 |
| Middle | 213 | 19.2 |
| Fourth | 225 | 20.3 |
| Highest | 224 | 20.2 |
| Infant sex | ||
| Male | 470 | 42.4 |
| Female | 639 | 57.6 |
| Birth order | ||
| 1–2 | 417 | 47.6 |
| 3–4 | 427 | 38.5 |
| 5a | 265 | 23.9 |
a(Daily labor, private worker, student, teacher)
Maternal health services characteristics in rural Tigray region, Northern Ethiopia, August 2017
| Variables | Frequency ( | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Birth interval (in months) ( | ||
| < 24 | 172 | 15.5 |
| 24–36 | 565 | 50.9 |
| > 36 | 168 | 15.1 |
| ANC visit | ||
| Yes | 1018 | 91.8 |
| No | 91 | 8.2 |
| Number of ANC visit | ||
| No ANC visit | 91 | 8.2 |
| 1 | 36 | 3.2 |
| 2–3 | 435 | 39.2 |
| 4+ | 547 | 49.3 |
| Complication during ANC | ||
| Yes | 157 | 14.2 |
| No | 952 | 85.8 |
| Place of delivery | ||
| Health institution | 945 | 85.2 |
| Home | 164 | 14.8 |
| Mode of delivery ( | ||
| Normal | 882 | 79.5 |
| Instrumental delivery (forcep,vacuums) | 43 | 3.9 |
| Cesarean Section (C/S) | 20 | 1.8 |
| Complication during delivery | ||
| Yes | 193 | 17.4 |
| No | 916 | 82.6 |
| Where PNC received ( | ||
| Health center | 291 | 58.5 |
| Hospital | 34 | 6.8 |
| Health post | 172 | 34.7 |
| Number of PNC visit ( | ||
| 1–2 | 417 | 83.9 |
| > =3 | 80 | 16.1 |
| Complication during postnatal period | ||
| Yes | 150 | 13.5 |
| No | 959 | 86.5 |
| Counseled for PNC by health extension worker | ||
| Yes | 802 | 72.3 |
| No | 307 | 27.7 |
a(Among those who have previous child)
Descriptive statistics of current contraceptive practice of the study participants in rural Tigray region, Northern Ethiopia, August 2017
| Variables | Frequency ( | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Current use of contraceptive | ||
| Yes | 425 | 38.3 |
| No | 684 | 61.7 |
| Types of contraceptive use | ||
| Injection | 200 | 47.1 |
| Implants (Implanon, Sinoplant and Jadelle) | 125 | 29.4 |
| Pills | 60 | 14.1 |
| IUD | 40 | 9.4 |
| Reason for utilization | ||
| Spacing | 390 | 91.7 |
| Limiting | 35 | 8.3 |
| Sources of contraceptive | ||
| Health center | 225 | 52.9 |
| Health post | 140 | 32.9 |
| Hospital | 50 | 11.8 |
| Private clinic | 10 | 2.4 |
| Intention to use contraceptive in the future | ||
| Spacing | 450 | 90 |
| Limiting | 50 | 10 |
Predictors of postpartum contraceptive use in rural Tigray region, northern Ethiopia, 2017: a multi level analysis
| Determinants | Model 1 | Model 2 AOR [95% CI] | Model 3 AOR [95% CI] | Model 4 AOR [95% CI] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed effect | ||||
| Maternal educational-level | ||||
| Not educated | – | 1 | – | 1 |
| Primary-level | – | 3.0 (2.1–3.0) | – | 0.7 (0.6–2.1) |
| Secondary-level | – | 2.3 (2.1–5.3)* | – | 0.5 (0.4–3.2) |
| Diploma and above | – | 3.5 (1.9–6.0)* | – | 0.4 (0.3–1.3) |
| Partner educational-level | ||||
| Not educated | – | 1 | – | 1 |
| Primary-level | – | 1.3 (1.2–3.2)* | – | 0.9 (0.8–2.3) |
| Secondary-level | – | 2.2 (1.5–4.4)* | – | 2.3 (1.8–3.5)** |
| Diploma-level | – | 1.4 (1.3–3.5)** | – | 1.2 (1.1–2.6)*** |
| Wealth index | ||||
| Lowest | – | 1 | – | 1 |
| Second | – | 2. 5(1.3–4.6)* | – | 0.5 (0.4–1.3) |
| Middle | – | 2.1 (1.9–5.1)* | – | 0.8 (0.7–2.4) |
| Fourth | – | 1.3 (1.1–2.4)** | – | 1.2 (1.1–3.2)*** |
| Fifth | – | 1.8 (1.5–3.2)** | – | 1.5 (1.3–2.5)*** |
| PNC | – | |||
| Yes | – | 2.3 (1.3–3.0)** | – | 2.0 (1.9–4.3)*** |
| No | – | 1 | – | 1 |
| Yes | – | 2.7 (1.8–3.9)* | – | 0.4 (0.3–2.1) |
| No | – | 1 | – | 1 |
| History of complication during delivery | ||||
| Yes | – | 1.8 (1.5–2.7)* | – | 0.3 (0.2–1.3) |
| No | – | 1 | – | 1 |
| Model household | ||||
| Yes | – | 1.4 (1.2–3.0)* | – | 0.6 (0.4–1.7) |
| No | – | 1 | – | 1 |
| Community of 4+ ANC use | ||||
| High | – | – | 3.4 (2.4–6.1)** | 2.1 (1.9–4.2)** |
| Low | – | – | 1 | 1 |
| Distance to nearest health facility | ||||
| Facility in the village | – | – | 4.3 (3.9–5.4)** | 3.0 (2.7–4.6)** |
| 1 to 5 km | – | – | 2.7 (1.8–5.0)* | 0.6 (0.3–1.4) |
| > 5 km | – | – | 1 | 1 |
| Main sources of income | ||||
| Farming | – | – | 1 | 1 |
| Mixed | – | – | 1.3 (1.2–3.9)* | 0.4 (0.3–1.7) |
| Districts of residence | ||||
| Tanquae-Abrgelle | – | – | 1 | 1 |
| Tahtay -MayChew | – | – | 0.7 (0.6–2.9) | 0.5 (0.4–2.1) |
| LaeLay -Maychew | – | – | 2.5 (2.1–3.0)* | 0.7 (0.6–1.9) |
| Rural Adwa | – | – | 3.0 (2.3–4.8)* | 0.4 (0.3–2.3) |
| Random effects | ||||
| PCV | 1 | 60.3 | 65.7 | 71.4 |
| VPC | 70 | 55.8 | 50.9 | 49.6 |
| Community variance (SE) (Level 2) | 8.07 (3.01)*** | 3.71 (1.14)*** | 3.30 (1.04)*** | 3.13 (0.91)*** |
| AIC (model fit statistics) | 1500 | 1450 | 1200 | 750 |
Model 1 is the null model, contained no exposure variables
Model 2 adjusted for individual-level variables
Model 3 adjusted for community-level variables
Model 4 adjusted for both individual and community-level variables
***(p < 0.001) **(p < 0.01), *p < 0.05), 1: reference category