Literature DB >> 30114534

Predominance of Spinal Metastases Involving the Posterior Vertebral Body.

Marissa Guo1, Kristen L Kolberg1, Eleanor C Smith2, Brandon W Smith3, Jonah E Yousif1, Jason L Kessler1, Joseph R Linzey1, Anda-Alexandra Calinescu3, Gregory A Clines4, Daniel E Spratt5, Nicholas J Szerlip6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spinal metastases pose significant morbidity. For many histologies, the spine is a frequent site for bone metastases. This predilection is not fully understood, and there are conflicting reports regarding the distribution within the vertebral body itself. Knowing this distribution will give clues as to the underlying biologic reason for this increased incidence in the spine and lead to a better understanding of tumor dispersion and growth.
METHODS: We retrospectively examined magnetic resonance imaging scans of patients undergoing radiation to the spine from 2015 to 2017 for spinal metastases. The anatomical distribution of lesions was categorized. Lesions were sorted along the sagittal plane into 5 groups: anterior only, anterior + middle, middle only, posterior + middle, and posterior only. Lesions that covered all groups were discarded. χ2 and post-hoc analyses were used for statistical analyses.
RESULTS: Three hundred metastatic lesions were examined in 89 patients; 203 lesions were used for analysis. Sixty-five percent of all lesions were found in posterior only and posterior + middle aspects of the vertebral body (P < 0.0001). This localization was significant regardless of histology: lung (67%, P < 0.0001), kidney (66%, P < 0.0001), sarcoma (67%, P < 0.0001), prostate (63%, P = 0.01), and breast (63%, P = 0.01). This was consistent across thoracic (n = 96) and lumbar (n = 63) regions (72% and 64%, respectively, P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Metastatic lesions of the thoracolumbar spine have a greater propensity to localize to the posterior aspect of the vertebral body. These data support the hypothesis that there may be differences within the vertebral body leading to differential tumor dispersion and growth.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone microenvironment; Cancer; Dura; Magnetic resonance imaging; Spinal metastases; Vertebral body

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30114534     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  2 in total

1.  Dura promotes metastatic potential in prostate cancer through the CXCR2 pathway.

Authors:  Michael J Strong; Sabrina Rocco; Russell Taichman; Gregory A Clines; Nicholas J Szerlip
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Clinical utility of convolutional neural networks for treatment planning in radiotherapy for spinal metastases.

Authors:  Sebastiaan R S Arends; Mark H F Savenije; Wietse S C Eppinga; Joanne M van der Velden; Cornelis A T van den Berg; Joost J C Verhoeff
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-02-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.