Literature DB >> 30113939

American Joint Replacement Registry Risk Calculator Does Not Predict 90-day Mortality in Veterans Undergoing Total Joint Replacement.

Alex H S Harris1, Alfred C Kuo, Kevin J Bozic, Edmund Lau, Thomas Bowe, Shalini Gupta, Nicholas J Giori.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) Total Joint Risk Calculator uses demographic and clinical parameters to provide risk estimates for 90-day mortality and 2-year periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The tool is intended to help surgeons counsel their Medicare-eligible patients about their risk of death and PJI after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). However, for a predictive risk model to be useful, it must be accurate when applied to new patients; this has yet to be established for this calculator. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: To produce accuracy metrics (ie, discrimination, calibration) for the AJRR mortality calculator using data from Medicare-eligible patients undergoing TJA in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), the largest integrated healthcare system in the United States, where more than 10,000 TJAs are performed annually.
METHODS: We used the AJRR calculator to predict risk of death within 90 days of surgery among 31,214 VHA patients older than 64 years of age who underwent primary TJA; data was drawn from the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Project (VASQIP) and VA Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW). We then used VHA mortality data to evaluate the extent to which the AJRR calculator estimates distinguished individuals who died compared with those who did not (C-statistic), and graphically depicted the relationship between estimated risk and observed mortality (calibration). As a secondary evaluation of the calculator, a sample of 39,300 patients younger than 65 years old was assigned to the youngest age group available to the user (65-69 years) as might be done in real-world practice.
RESULTS: C-statistics for 90-day mortality for the older samples were 0.62 (95% CI, 0.60-0.64) and for the younger samples they were 0.46 (95% CI, 0.43-0.49), suggesting poor discrimination. Calibration analysis revealed poor correspondence between deciles of predicted risk and observed mortality rates. Poor discrimination and calibration mean that patients who died will frequently have a lower estimated risk of death than surviving patients.
CONCLUSIONS: For Medicare-eligible patients receiving TJA in the VA, the AJRR risk calculator had a poor performance in the prediction of 90-day mortality. There are several possible reasons for the model's poor performance. Veterans Health Administration patients, 97% of whom were men, represent only a subset of the broader Medicare population. However, applying the calculator to a subset of the target population should not affect its accuracy. Other reasons for poor performance include a lack of an underlying statistical model in the calculator's implementation and simply the challenge of predicting rare events. External validation in a more representative sample of Medicare patients should be conducted to before assuming this tool is accurate for its intended use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, diagnostic study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30113939      PMCID: PMC6259803          DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  11 in total

Review 1.  A readers' guide to the interpretation of diagnostic test properties: clinical example of sepsis.

Authors:  Joachim E Fischer; Lucas M Bachmann; Roman Jaeschke
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Risk Prediction Tools for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  David W Manning; Adam I Edelstein; Hasham M Alvi
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  The ACS NSQIP Risk Calculator Is a Fair Predictor of Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

Authors:  Nathaniel C Wingert; James Gotoff; Edgardo Parrilla; Robert Gotoff; Laura Hou; Elie Ghanem
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Patient-related risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection and postoperative mortality following total hip arthroplasty in Medicare patients.

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Edmund Lau; Steven Kurtz; Kevin Ong; Harry Rubash; Thomas P Vail; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Patient-related risk factors for postoperative mortality and periprosthetic joint infection in medicare patients undergoing TKA.

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Edmund Lau; Steven Kurtz; Kevin Ong; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Can the American College of Surgeons Risk Calculator Predict 30-Day Complications After Knee and Hip Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Adam I Edelstein; Mary J Kwasny; Linda I Suleiman; Rishi H Khakhkhar; Michael A Moore; Matthew D Beal; David W Manning
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Prediction Models for 30-Day Mortality and Complications After Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasties for Veteran Health Administration Patients With Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Alex Hs Harris; Alfred C Kuo; Thomas Bowe; Shalini Gupta; David Nordin; Nicholas J Giori
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Estimating risk in Medicare patients with THA: an electronic risk calculator for periprosthetic joint infection and mortality.

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Kevin Ong; Edmund Lau; Daniel J Berry; Thomas P Vail; Steven M Kurtz; Harry E Rubash
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD).

Authors:  Gary S Collins; Johannes B Reitsma; Douglas G Altman; Karel G M Moons
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Consensus Statement on Electronic Health Predictive Analytics: A Guiding Framework to Address Challenges.

Authors:  Ruben Amarasingham; Anne-Marie J Audet; David W Bates; I Glenn Cohen; Martin Entwistle; G J Escobar; Vincent Liu; Lynn Etheredge; Bernard Lo; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Sudha Ram; Suchi Saria; Lisa M Schilling; Anand Shahi; Walter F Stewart; Ewout W Steyerberg; Bin Xie
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2016-03-07
View more
  8 in total

1.  Can Machine Learning Methods Produce Accurate and Easy-to-use Prediction Models of 30-day Complications and Mortality After Knee or Hip Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Alex H S Harris; Alfred C Kuo; Yingjie Weng; Amber W Trickey; Thomas Bowe; Nicholas J Giori
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  CORR Insights®: American Joint Replacement Registry Risk Calculator Does Not Predict 90-day Mortality in Veterans Undergoing Total Joint Replacement.

Authors:  Glenn D Wera
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  A Novel, Potentially Universal Machine Learning Algorithm to Predict Complications in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sai K Devana; Akash A Shah; Changhee Lee; Andrew R Roney; Mihaela van der Schaar; Nelson F SooHoo
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-08-02

4.  Development of a Machine Learning Algorithm for Prediction of Complications and Unplanned Readmission Following Primary Anatomic Total Shoulder Replacements.

Authors:  Sai K Devana; Akash A Shah; Changhee Lee; Andrew R Jensen; Edward Cheung; Mihaela van der Schaar; Nelson F SooHoo
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2022-04-19

5.  Readmission, Complication, and Disposition Calculators in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systemic Review.

Authors:  Cole M Howie; Simon C Mears; C Lowry Barnes; Jeffrey B Stambough
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Prediction of Major Complications and Readmission After Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Machine Learning-Driven Approach.

Authors:  Akash A Shah; Sai K Devana; Changhee Lee; Amador Bugarin; Elizabeth L Lord; Arya N Shamie; Don Y Park; Mihaela van der Schaar; Nelson F SooHoo
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.210

7.  Establishing a risk prediction model for acute kidney injury: methodology is important.

Authors:  Lei Wan; Fu-Shan Xue; Liu-Jia-Zi Shao; Rui-Juan Guo
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 8.  Artificial intelligence in diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis and prediction of arthroplasty outcomes: a review.

Authors:  Lok Sze Lee; Ping Keung Chan; Chunyi Wen; Wing Chiu Fung; Amy Cheung; Vincent Wai Kwan Chan; Man Hong Cheung; Henry Fu; Chun Hoi Yan; Kwong Yuen Chiu
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2022-03-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.