Literature DB >> 30112827

Do Skilled Nursing Facilities Selected to Participate in Preferred Provider Networks Have Higher Quality and Lower Costs?

Peter J Huckfeldt1, Lianna Weissblum1, José J Escarce2, Pinar Karaca-Mandic3, Neeraj Sood4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) chosen by health systems to participate in preferred provider networks exhibited differences in quality, costs, and patient outcomes relative to other SNFs after accounting for differences in case mix. DATA SOURCES: Medicare provider and claims data, 2012 and 2013. STUDY
DESIGN: We compared SNFs included in preferred networks relative to other SNFs in the same market, prior to the establishment of preferred provider networks. DATA EXTRACTION
METHODS: We linked the SNFs in our sample to facility characteristics and quality data. We identified SNF admissions and hospitalizations in claims data and limited the analysis to patients discharged from the hospitals in our sample. We obtained patient characteristics from Medicare summary files and the preceding hospital stay. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Preferred SNFs exhibited better performance across publicly reported quality measures. Patients admitted to preferred SNFs exhibited shorter stays, lower Medicare payments, and lower probability of SNF readmission relative to nonpreferred SNFs.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results imply that health systems selected SNFs with lower resource use and better performance on quality measures. Thus, the trend toward preferred provider networks could have implications for Medicare spending and patient health. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health economics; referrals and referral networks; rehabilitation services

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30112827      PMCID: PMC6232398          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  11 in total

1.  Medicare's New Bundled Payments: Design, Strategy, and Evolution.

Authors:  Matthew J Press; Rahul Rajkumar; Patrick H Conway
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.

Authors:  A Elixhauser; C Steiner; D R Harris; R M Coffey
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Patients Are Not Given Quality-Of-Care Data About Skilled Nursing Facilities When Discharged From Hospitals.

Authors:  Denise A Tyler; Emily A Gadbois; John P McHugh; Renée R Shield; Ulrika Winblad; Vincent Mor
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Reducing Hospital Readmissions Through Preferred Networks Of Skilled Nursing Facilities.

Authors:  John P McHugh; Andrew Foster; Vincent Mor; Renée R Shield; Amal N Trivedi; Terrie Wetle; Jacqueline S Zinn; Denise A Tyler
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Little Evidence Exists To Support The Expectation That Providers Would Consolidate To Enter New Payment Models.

Authors:  Hannah T Neprash; Michael E Chernew; J Michael McWilliams
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  The revolving door of rehospitalization from skilled nursing facilities.

Authors:  Vincent Mor; Orna Intrator; Zhanlian Feng; David C Grabowski
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Effect of hospital-SNF referral linkages on rehospitalization.

Authors:  Momotazur Rahman; Andrew D Foster; David C Grabowski; Jacqueline S Zinn; Vincent Mor
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Dual Eligibility, Selection of Skilled Nursing Facility, and Length of Medicare Paid Postacute Stay.

Authors:  Momotazur Rahman; Pedro Gozalo; Denise Tyler; David C Grabowski; Amal Trivedi; Vincent Mor
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.929

9.  Coordination versus competition in health care reform.

Authors:  Katherine Baicker; Helen Levy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Early Performance of Accountable Care Organizations in Medicare.

Authors:  J Michael McWilliams; Laura A Hatfield; Michael E Chernew; Bruce E Landon; Aaron L Schwartz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  6 in total

1.  Purchasing High-Quality Community Nursing Home Care: A Will to Work With VHA Diminished by Contracting Burdens.

Authors:  Kate H Magid; Emily Galenbeck; Leah M Haverhals; Portia Y Cornell; Patience Moyo; Amy L Mochel; Emily Corneau; James L Rudolph; Vincent Mor; Cari Levy
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 7.802

2.  The effects of vertically integrated care on health care use and outcomes in inpatient rehabilitation facilities.

Authors:  Neeraj Sood; Victoria Shier; Peter J Huckfeldt; Lianna Weissblum; José J Escarce
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-05-09       Impact factor: 3.734

3.  The Effects of Accountable Care Organizations Forming Preferred Skilled Nursing Facility Networks on Market Share, Patient Composition, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Jing Gu; Peter Huckfeldt; Neeraj Sood
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.178

4.  Exploring Resident Care Information Technology Use and Nursing Home Quality.

Authors:  Kimberly R Powell; Chelsea B Deroche; Ethan J Carnahan; Gregory L Alexander
Journal:  J Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 1.436

5.  Application of High-Intensity Functional Resistance Training in a Skilled Nursing Facility: An Implementation Study.

Authors:  Allison M Gustavson; Daniel J Malone; Rebecca S Boxer; Jeri E Forster; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2020-09-28

6.  The association of vertically integrated care with health care use and outcomes.

Authors:  Peter J Huckfeldt; Jing Gu; José J Escarce; Pinar Karaca-Mandic; Neeraj Sood
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.734

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.