Literature DB >> 30112792

Efficacy and safety of MYL-1501D versus insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes after 24 weeks: Results of the phase III INSTRIDE 2 study.

Thomas C Blevins1, Abhijit Barve2, Bin Sun2, Yaron Raiter3, Patrick Aubonnet4, Rafael Muniz2, Sandeep Athalye5, Michael Ankersen2.   

Abstract

AIMS: To assess the non-inferiority of MYL-1501D, a proposed biosimilar or follow-on biological agent to marketed insulin glargine, to reference insulin glargine (Lantus®; Sanofi-Aventis US LLC, Bridgewater, New Jersey) based on change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: INSTRIDE 2 was a multicentre, open-label, randomized, parallel-group, phase III non-inferiority study comparing the efficacy and safety of MYL-1501D with those of reference insulin glargine in insulin-naive and insulin-non-naive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs). The primary efficacy endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24. Secondary endpoints included metabolic readouts (eg, changes in fasting plasma glucose, insulin dosage, self-monitored blood glucose), immunogenicity and adverse events, including hypoglycaemia and nocturnal hypoglycaemic events.
RESULTS: In all, 560 patients were randomized to MYL-1501D or insulin glargine in combination with OADs for 24 weeks. The mean change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24 was -0.60% (95% CI -0.78, -0.41) and - 0.66% (95% CI -0.84, -0.48) for MYL-1501D and reference insulin glargine, respectively. MYL-1501D was well tolerated and had a safety profile similar to that of reference insulin glargine.
CONCLUSIONS: Demonstration of non-inferiority between MYL-1501D and reference insulin glargine for reduction of HbA1c during 24 weeks of treatment was achieved. The two treatment groups were similar in terms of secondary endpoints, including hypoglycaemia and nocturnal hypoglycaemia, local and systemic reactions, other safety variables, and immunogenicity.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biosimilar; efficacy; insulin glargine; safety; type 2 diabetes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30112792     DOI: 10.1111/dom.13495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab        ISSN: 1462-8902            Impact factor:   6.577


  8 in total

Review 1.  Update on Biosimilar Insulins: A US Perspective.

Authors:  Rong M Zhang; Ritika Puri; Janet B McGill
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 7.744

2.  Efficacy and safety of MYL-1501D versus insulin glargine in people with type 1 diabetes mellitus: Results of the INSTRIDE 3 phase 3 switch study.

Authors:  Thomas C Blevins; Abhijit Barve; Yaron Raiter; Patrick Aubonnet; Sandeep Athalye; Bin Sun; Rafael Muniz
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 6.577

3.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic bioequivalence of proposed biosimilar MYL-1501D with US and European insulin glargine formulations in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Tim Heise; Charles Donnelly; Abhijit Barve; Patrick Aubonnet
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2019-12-15       Impact factor: 6.577

4.  Immunogenicity and Efficacy of Insulin Glargine Biosimilar Ezelin versus Originator Insulin Glargine in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Tri Juli Edi Tarigan; Adisti Dwijayanti; Susie Setyowati; Melva Louisa
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 3.168

5.  Utilisation Trend of Long-Acting Insulin Analogues including Biosimilars across Europe: Findings and Implications.

Authors:  Brian Godman; Magdalene Wladysiuk; Stuart McTaggart; Amanj Kurdi; Eleonora Allocati; Mihajlo Jakovljevic; Francis Kalemeera; Iris Hoxha; Anna Nachtnebel; Robert Sauermann; Manfred Hinteregger; Vanda Marković-Peković; Biljana Tubic; Guenka Petrova; Konstantin Tachkov; Juraj Slabý; Radka Nejezchlebova; Iva Selke Krulichová; Ott Laius; Gisbert Selke; Irene Langner; András Harsanyi; András Inotai; Arianit Jakupi; Svens Henkuzens; Kristina Garuolienė; Jolanta Gulbinovič; Patricia Vella Bonanno; Jakub Rutkowski; Skule Ingeberg; Øyvind Melien; Ileana Mardare; Jurij Fürst; Sean MacBride-Stewart; Carol Holmes; Caridad Pontes; Corinne Zara; Marta Turu Pedrola; Mikael Hoffmann; Vasileios Kourafalos; Alice Pisana; Rita Banzi; Stephen Campbell; Bjorn Wettermark
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Efficacy and immunogenicity of insulin biosimilar compared to their reference products: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Li-Jou Yang; Ta-Wei Wu; Chao-Hsiun Tang; Tzu-Rong Peng
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 2.763

Review 7.  MYL1501D Insulin Glargine: A Review in Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Sheridan M Hoy
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 5.807

8.  Similar immunogenicity profiles between the proposed biosimilar MYL-1501D and reference insulin glargine in patients with diabetes mellitus: the phase 3 INSTRIDE 1 and INSTRIDE 2 studies.

Authors:  Bin Sun; Nilanjan Sengupta; Anita Rao; Charles Donnelly; Vinit Waichale; Arnab Sinha Roy; Shilpa Ramaswamy; Divya Pathak; Ronald R Bowsher; Yaron Raiter; Patrick Aubonnet; Abhijit Barve
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 2.763

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.