Domenico Albano1, Maria Beatrice Panarotto2, Rexhep Durmo2, Carlo Rodella3, Francesco Bertagna4, Raffaele Giubbini4. 1. Nuclear Medicine, Spedali Civili Brescia, Brescia, Italy. doalba87@libero.it. 2. Nuclear Medicine, Spedali Civili Brescia, Brescia, Italy. 3. Health Physics Department, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy. 4. Nuclear Medicine, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Distant metastases (DM) from DTC occur in 5-25% of cases and are correlated to lower survival; the prognostic significance of the temporal onset of DM is unclear. Our aim was to retrospectively analyze the prevalence of DM and to assess the prognostic role of the timing of manifestation of DM regarding the outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 174 patients (mean age 64 years). According to the time of manifestation, DM were divided in two groups: synchronous DM (SDM, n = 108) defined as metastases present at initial diagnosis and metachronous DM (MDM, n = 66) as diagnosed during follow-up. SDM were further sub grouped in pre-RAIT when diagnosed during pre-surgery work-up (n = 35) and baseline-RAIT when detected by first whole body scan after RAIT (n = 73). Disease-specific survival (DSS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Total RAI activities and number of treatments were significantly higher in MDM, also loss of RAI avidity was more frequent in MDM. Forty-four patients died during follow-up, of which 41 were DTC-related deaths, 5-year and 10-year DSS were 80% and 56%. On univariate analysis MDM had significantly shorter DSS; also histotype and RAI avidity were significant risk factors of impaired survival. On multivariate analysis, only loss of RAI avidity remained as independent negative predictor (p = 0.043). Considering SDM, DSS was significantly shorter in pre-RAIT group than baseline-RAIT (p = 0.004). Instead there was no significant difference between pre-RAIT-SDM and MDM in survival outcome (p = 0.875). CONCLUSIONS: In DTC with DM, loss of RAI uptake has an important role in survival. No significant difference in survival outcome was discovered between SDM and MDM; but, among SDM, pre-RAIT had significant shorter DSS than baseline-RAIT.
PURPOSE: Distant metastases (DM) from DTC occur in 5-25% of cases and are correlated to lower survival; the prognostic significance of the temporal onset of DM is unclear. Our aim was to retrospectively analyze the prevalence of DM and to assess the prognostic role of the timing of manifestation of DM regarding the outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 174 patients (mean age 64 years). According to the time of manifestation, DM were divided in two groups: synchronous DM (SDM, n = 108) defined as metastases present at initial diagnosis and metachronous DM (MDM, n = 66) as diagnosed during follow-up. SDM were further sub grouped in pre-RAIT when diagnosed during pre-surgery work-up (n = 35) and baseline-RAIT when detected by first whole body scan after RAIT (n = 73). Disease-specific survival (DSS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Total RAI activities and number of treatments were significantly higher in MDM, also loss of RAI avidity was more frequent in MDM. Forty-four patients died during follow-up, of which 41 were DTC-related deaths, 5-year and 10-year DSS were 80% and 56%. On univariate analysis MDM had significantly shorter DSS; also histotype and RAI avidity were significant risk factors of impaired survival. On multivariate analysis, only loss of RAI avidity remained as independent negative predictor (p = 0.043). Considering SDM, DSS was significantly shorter in pre-RAIT group than baseline-RAIT (p = 0.004). Instead there was no significant difference between pre-RAIT-SDM and MDM in survival outcome (p = 0.875). CONCLUSIONS: In DTC with DM, loss of RAI uptake has an important role in survival. No significant difference in survival outcome was discovered between SDM and MDM; but, among SDM, pre-RAIT had significant shorter DSS than baseline-RAIT.
Entities:
Keywords:
Differentiated thyroid cancer; Distant metastases; Prognosis; RAI
Authors: C Durante; N Haddy; E Baudin; S Leboulleux; D Hartl; J P Travagli; B Caillou; M Ricard; J D Lumbroso; F De Vathaire; M Schlumberger Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2006-05-09 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: S F Dinneen; M J Valimaki; E J Bergstralh; J R Goellner; C A Gorman; I D Hay Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 1995-07 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: G Riesco-Eizaguirre; P Gutiérrez-Martínez; M A García-Cabezas; M Nistal; P Santisteban Journal: Endocr Relat Cancer Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 5.678
Authors: M Luster; S E Clarke; M Dietlein; M Lassmann; P Lind; W J G Oyen; J Tennvall; E Bombardieri Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Brian Hung-Hin Lang; Kai Pun Wong; Chung Yeung Cheung; Koon Yat Wan; Chung-Yau Lo Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2012-10-28 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: C Happel; W T Kranert; D Gröner; B Bockisch; A Sabet; I Vardarli; R Görges; K Herrmann; F Grünwald Journal: Endocrine Date: 2020-03-16 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Evert F S van Velsen; Merel T Stegenga; Folkert J van Kemenade; Boen L R Kam; Tessa M van Ginhoven; W Edward Visser; Robin P Peeters Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2020-03-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Hosu Kim; So Young Park; Jaehoon Jung; Jung-Han Kim; Soo Yeon Hahn; Jung Hee Shin; Young Lyun Oh; Man Ki Chung; Hye In Kim; Sun Wook Kim; Jae Hoon Chung; Tae Hyuk Kim Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-12-10 Impact factor: 4.379