Yousef Al-Thomali1, Sakeenabi Basha2, Roshan Noor Mohamed3. 1. Division of Orthodontics, Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, Taif University School of Dentistry, Taif, Saudi Arabia. 2. Division of Community Dentistry, Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, Taif University School of Dentistry, Taif, Saudi Arabia. 3. Division of Pedodontics, Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, Taif University School of Dentistry, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The present systemic review was conducted with the main purpose to evaluate the quantitative effects of orthognathic surgeries, extraction versus non-extraction treatment, and the type of malocclusion in the stability of anterior open-bite (AOB) correction over the long-term. METHODS: The systematic search for studies was conducted through MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Scopus, PsychINFO, various key journals, and review articles; November 30, 2016, was the last date for the search. The Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies was used to grade the methodological quality of the studies. RESULTS: The present review included 14 studies. Stability of the corrected AOB ranged from 61.9% to 100%. The studies with orthognathic surgeries showed a stability of 70-100%. The studies without orthognathic surgeries showed the stability of 61.9-96.7%. All of the studies were retrospective. The mean change in AOB before (T1) and after treatment (T2-T1) was 0.1 mm to 6.93 mm and the mean change in overbite from T2 to T3 (T3-T2) was -0.06 mm to 2.5 mm. CONCLUSION: Studies with orthognathic surgeries presented with high amount of long-term stability in corrected AOB. No significant difference was noticed in relation to the type of malocclusion and extraction or non-extraction cases.
OBJECTIVE: The present systemic review was conducted with the main purpose to evaluate the quantitative effects of orthognathic surgeries, extraction versus non-extraction treatment, and the type of malocclusion in the stability of anterior open-bite (AOB) correction over the long-term. METHODS: The systematic search for studies was conducted through MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Scopus, PsychINFO, various key journals, and review articles; November 30, 2016, was the last date for the search. The Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies was used to grade the methodological quality of the studies. RESULTS: The present review included 14 studies. Stability of the corrected AOB ranged from 61.9% to 100%. The studies with orthognathic surgeries showed a stability of 70-100%. The studies without orthognathic surgeries showed the stability of 61.9-96.7%. All of the studies were retrospective. The mean change in AOB before (T1) and after treatment (T2-T1) was 0.1 mm to 6.93 mm and the mean change in overbite from T2 to T3 (T3-T2) was -0.06 mm to 2.5 mm. CONCLUSION: Studies with orthognathic surgeries presented with high amount of long-term stability in corrected AOB. No significant difference was noticed in relation to the type of malocclusion and extraction or non-extraction cases.