| Literature DB >> 30112394 |
Fang Yuan1, Jian Ma2, Xinxin Xiang1,3, He Lan1,4, Yanhui Xu1, Jing Zhao1, Yin Li1, Weizhen Zhang1,5.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Adipose tissue inflammation is the key linking obesity to insulin resistance. Over 50% of the interstitial cells in adipose tissue are macrophages, which produce inflammatory cytokines and therefore play an important role in the progression of insulin resistance. Within this classification view, macrophage biology is driven by two polarization phenotypes, M1 (proinflammatory) and M2 (anti-inflammatory). The unique functional receptor of ghrelin, growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHSR), is a classic seven-transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor that is linked to multiple intracellular signaling pathways. Knockout of GHSR improves the obesity and glucose metabolic disorders, suggesting a crucial role of ghrelin activity in insulin resistance. Here, we discussed whether macrophage polarization phenotypes in adipose tissue were changed in GHSR knockout (GHSR-/-) mice.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30112394 PMCID: PMC6077514 DOI: 10.1155/2018/4924325
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
List and sequence of primers.
| Upstream primer (5′-3′) | Downstream primer (5′-3′) | |
|---|---|---|
| Resistin | TCCTTGTCCCTGAACTGC | ACGAATGTCCCACGAGC |
| Adiponectin | ACCAGTATCAGGAAAAGAATGT | TAGAGAAGAAAGCCAGTAAATG |
| IL-6 | AGTTGTGCAATGGCAATTCTG | GGAAATTGGGGTAGGAAGGAC |
| PAI-1 | CCTCACCAACATCTTGGATGCT | TGCAGTGCCTGTGCTACAGAGA |
| MCP-1 | ACTGAAGCCAGCTCTCTCTTCCTC | TTCCTTCTTGGGTCAGCACAGAC |
| TNF- | CGTCGTAGCAAACCACCAAG | GAGATAGCAAATCGGCTGACG |
| iNOS | CCAAGCCCTCACCTACTTCC | CTCTGAGGGCTGACACAAGG |
| Arg-1 | CTCCAAGCCAAAGTCCTTAGAG | AGGAGCTGTCATTAGGGACATC |
| Mgl-1 | TGAGAAAGGCTTTAAGAACTGGG | GACCACCTGTAGTGATGTGGG |
| Mrc-1 | AAACACAGACTGACCCTTCCC | GTTAGTGTACCGCACCCTCC |
|
| ATCTGGCACCACACCTTC | AGCCAGGTCCAGACGCA |
Figure 1Improvement of glucose metabolism in GHSR knockout mice. (a) Body weight of GHSR knockout (GHSR-/-) mice and wild type (WT) mice fed with different diet. (b) The average daily food intake of GHSR-/- mice and wild type (WT) mice fed with normal chow diet or high fat diet for 12 weeks. (c) The average daily water intake of GHSR-/- mice and wild type mice fed with normal chow diet or high fat diet. (d) Results of glucose tolerance test using GHSR knockout mice and wild type mice fed with normal chow diet (NCD) or high fat diet (HFD) for 12 weeks. All results were expressed as means±SEM. (e) Western blotting results from GHSR knockout mice and wild type mice fed with normal chow diet or high fat diet for 12 weeks. Insulin at a dose of 2 IU/kg was injected intraperitoneally 15 min before harvest of the adipose tissue; phospho-Akt (Ser473) and Akt in adipose tissue were detected using specific antibodies. Total Akt level was used as internal control. Quantification of image analysis of p-Akt/Akt was expressed as means±SEM. ∗ denotes P<0.05 compared with wild type mice fed with NCD; denotes P<0.05 compared with WT mice fed with HFD.
Figure 2Improvement of adipose tissue inflammation in GHSR knockout mice. (a) Expression of inflammatory adipokines in epididymal adipose tissue of GHSR knockout mice, such as anti-inflammatory adipokine adiponectin and proinflammatory adipokines resistin, IL-6, and PAI-1. Relative mRNA levels were normalized to the levels for wild type mice fed with normal chow diet. Data are means±SEM, n=5. (b) Adipocytes volume and interstitial cell infiltration detected by H&E staining. (c) Macrophage infiltration detected by immunofluorescence histochemistry staining of Mac-3. ∗ denotes P<0.05 compared with WT mice fed with NCD; denotes P<0.05 compared with WT mice fed with HFD.
Figure 3Macrophage polarization in epididymal adipose tissue of GHSR knockout mice. The mRNAs were extracted from the epididymal adipose tissue harvested from the GHSR knockout mice and wild type mice fed with different diet. Real-time PCR was performed to evaluate the expression of macrophage specific markers. (a) M1 markers MCP-1, TNF-α, iNOS and (b) M2 markers Arg-1, Mgl-1, Mrc1 were detected. Data are means±SEM n=5. ∗ denotes P<0.05 compared with WT mice fed with NCD; denotes P<0.05 compared with WT mice fed with HFD.
Figure 4Acyl ghrelin influences the effect of LPS or IL-4 on RAW264.7 cell polarization. The mRNAs were extracted from the RAW 264.7 pretreated with acyl ghrelin for 30 minutes then for 6 hours with LPS (10 ng/ml) (a) or IL-4 (10 ng/ml) (b). Real-time PCR was performed to evaluate the expression of macrophage specific markers Arg-1 and MCP-1. Data are means±SEM from 3 separate experiments. ∗ denotes P<0.05 compared with control group; denotes P<0.05 compared with cells treated with LPS or IL-4 alone.